From my limited understanding, the $1.2B purchase price that has been so often referenced in this thread was only
one of two options for the Participating Bidders. See the Sale and Investment Solicitation Process - the Development Proposal option is likely the more realistic one (italics/underscores/caps are mine):
"The purpose of the SISP is to seek and implement proposal(s) from Participating Bidders for either:
- (i) a Transaction Proposal, being an acquisition or investment in the Project pursuant to one or more sale or investment transactions with an individual or aggregate purchase price or investment amount equal to or exceeding $1.2 billion, being the minimum bid threshold required by the Senior Secured Lenders; OR
- (ii) a Development Proposal, being an arrangement with the Senior Secured Lenders to complete the construction, development and realization of value from the Project on terms acceptable to each of the Receiver and Senior Secured Lenders (together with the Transaction Proposal, the “Opportunities” and each, an “Opportunity”).
The goal of the Transaction Proposal or Development Proposal is to maximize the value of the Project and continue its construction and development to completion for the benefit of stakeholders."
See also the Receiver's most recent and scathing report (which contains some praise for Skygrid). We are past the posted deadlines (Oct 14 for Court approval - pending Court availability - of the winning bid, and there's no indication on the Receiver's website of any extension to the deadlines so far) so time will tell what's next...