AlvinofDiaspar
Moderator
Hmm, Transdev is basically Veolia - we shall see how it goes.
AoD
AoD
$4.6B includes 30 year operation and maintenance. The $1.4B figure is just for design and construction.
Add cost inflation to that, and I imagine operating costs of buses are more than half that of the LRT.Thanks - I figured I was missing part of the story.
That sent me looking for the 2016 BCA which put the costs at
Original Capital Cost $1,193M
60-year Renewal Cost $609M including vehicles
Incremental Operating costs $21.3M annually (that's incremental over bus, where the contract is probably absolute cost). If you double that to guesstimate the possible full contracted cost, over 30 years you get $1.2B
So I can account for $3B by rough math. Those costs were always in the picture, so the construction-only figure I had fixated in my brain was probably always unrealistic especially once the decision was made to go DBFOM.
Didn't help that ML and the media and the pols all used the lower figure all along (for obvious reasons - who likes sticker shock?)
A good lesson in looking carefully at quoted figures.
- Paul
It says the 4.6b figure is adjusted for inflation so I am not sure if you took that into account.Thanks - I figured I was missing part of the story.
That sent me looking for the 2016 BCA which put the costs at
Original Capital Cost $1,193M
60-year Renewal Cost $609M including vehicles
Incremental Operating costs $21.3M annually (that's incremental over bus, where the contract is probably absolute cost). If you double that to guesstimate the possible full contracted cost, over 30 years you get $1.2B
So I can account for $3B by rough math. Those costs were always in the picture, so the construction-only figure I had fixated in my brain was probably always unrealistic especially once the decision was made to go DBFOM.
Didn't help that ML and the media and the pols all used the lower figure all along (for obvious reasons - who likes sticker shock?)
A good lesson in looking carefully at quoted figures.
- Paul
Grass has been brought up in place of concrete and shot down to too much work to maintain it and only good for 8 months. I guess storm water run off is better with concrete than grass, as well the environment? It was noted that grass has been removed from the Eglinton Line now, but don't me to that as it was opposite what I was told a few months ago.
Thanks for this post Drum, very helpful. I was wondering if you could clarify something for me:
Do you know if they are at least looking at permeable concrete in order to allow for increased infiltration of precipitation? This would seem to be a good opportunity to mitigate potential flooding impacts (Cooksville Creek experienced significant flooding a few years ago, and is the reason that the City is looking to buy up a bunch of properties in the flood risk zone to convert to parkland).
Hydro wires will not be bury. Poles will be replace if they have to be shifted as well how far from current location or need replacing. All the stops other than Sq One, Port Credit and maybe Steeles will upscale, depending what upscale is. Otherwise, stations have been down graded due to cost.Drum, thanks for posting those shots. just confirm from what you wrote. All the hydro poles are staying as is? Not being replaced or being buried? The city was to be putting extra money to do some upgrades of the stops. I know it was scaled back a bit. Do we know any more details on this. Cant really find any info... BTW the interesting part is going to see how this rathburn/403/hwy 10 in and out is going to work out once built. I really hope they go through it and built a large transit terminal to in compass LRT, Miway & GO. Then it will give more justification to this in and out spaghetti.
Thanks Drum. So looks like a March 2020 construction start. Only 4 months away!
I sincerely hope Brampton shall never receive a single penny from any level of government for transit expansion going forwardJeffreys also noted
- municipality wasn’t equipped to understand the concept or purpose
- To never give up on lobbying with politicians and don’t underestimate them
- Always be willing to explain stuff to them. Don't assume they know anything
- She gave a big shout out to Metrolinx for their professionalism on the HMLRT file
Start is seeing real construction.Depends upon your definition of "start". Surveying (measurements) has already occurred.
This is what I recommended in 2006 during the Bill hearing. Need to remove municipality and politicians from the big picture so to not start, stop or interfere with the plan other keeping them informed on what is taking place. If that had happen in the approved Bill, Sheppard and the SRT would be LRT today as well construction well underway building the DRL. Brampton would be see the plan LRT on Main St construction stating in 2020.Jeffreys also noted
- municipality wasn’t equipped to understand the concept or purpose
- To never give up on lobbying with politicians and don’t underestimate them
- Always be willing to explain stuff to them. Don't assume they know anything
- She gave a big shout out to Metrolinx for their professionalism on the HMLRT file
I'm really not too sympathetic either. Hot take incoming: If you quantify the actions of Brampton City Council, I would say in relative terms of scale and impact to their respective systems, that Brampton Council have done worse for Brampton Transit than Rob Ford did for Toronto transit.I sincerely hope Brampton shall never receive a single penny from any level of government for transit expansion going forward
I'm really not too sympathetic either. Hot take incoming: If you quantify the actions of Brampton City Council, I would say in relative terms of scale and impact to their respective systems, that Brampton Council have done worse for Brampton Transit than Rob Ford did for Toronto transit.