News   May 01, 2024
 1.4K     1 
News   May 01, 2024
 374     0 
News   May 01, 2024
 369     0 

Zenn (Electric) Cars

North Americans (especially Americans) were always fascinated with the closely-knit concepts of freedom, autonomy, exclusivity, privacy, as well as mobility. These constitute extremely crucial pillars of the American Dream, and are deeply ingrained in the American psyche and lifestyle.

The cowboy, roaming around the Wild West, has always been an admired ideal of the American freedom and autonomy. The house on top of a hill was and is always regarded as prime real estate, especially if it was at a distance from the nearest neighbours. The suburbs and their escape–from–the–city objective captivated the American masses by providing them with the very ideals upon which their country was founded. The car provided exactly that premise. That’s why the Ford Model T was indispensable to Americans and an exemplification of that American Dream. The fact that you can go anywhere you like, with nothing stopping you, was very tempting and helped propel its sales, usage, and popularity among the public.

However, now we realize that this vision of the world is not the way to go about it, especially in the 21st century. We are not meant to run away from each other and exclusively cocoon ourselves in monstrous detached houses in the suburbs. Instead, more emphasis should be placed on neighbour relations, public transit, verticality, and density, to mention just a few. So, the fact that we still choose to cling on to cars will not be the answer in the distant future. We should aspire to utilize more railways than trucks, to transport goods, and more bikes and subways than cars, to transport ourselves. The car stands in direct opposition and disagreement with our urban future.

From an environmental perspective, if owning a Civic is better than owning a Hummer, and if owning a Zenn is better than owning a Civic, then why not owning a bike not better than owning a Zenn? Impractical?
Sooner or later, you’ll have to abandon it anyways, so why not start now on your own rather than suffer the consequences of its unsustainability and be forced to give it up later.

This is my philosophical opinion; it's not just about how sustainable or fuel efficient the car is, it's about how anti-social and egocentric it is.

Interesting post.

Considering that the automobile was, to a significant degree, developed in Europe, and that many high performance automobile manufacturers are still located there, its hard to identify the automobile as being a uniquely or exclusively American cultural icon - though it is often portrayed that way. Europe is pretty stuffed with cars as well, and the desire to own a car is something that is not restricted to the North American psyche, either.

Before automobiles, trains took people out of cities. During the 19th century, railway suburbs experienced massive growth. Cars merely followed the pattern to a greater degree. There is nothing to suggest that eliminating cars would eliminate sprawl. More effective transit could easily help generate more effective sprawl as well - sprawl that would be just a little more transit friendly rather than car friendly.

Either way, I don't see cars being eliminated. First of all, anyone living in semi-rural or in a rural situation would be royally screwed. Also, to suitably service or move around in modern cities of millions of people, we would require a truly massive growth in transit, or an otherwise wholesale restructuring of cities. In the end, the automobile will endure because it is practical - and not just in terms of selfish usage. These machines have their their place and are already integrated into the transportation infrastructure of the city. The problems posed by automobiles include improving their economy, energy efficiency and emissions reduction; and reducing overall numbers of automobile movements in the city - particularly when effective alternates are developed and are in place. The automobile itself is not the problem.

It's worth recalling that automobiles replaced tens of thousands of work horses. Try to imagine what a city in the summer smelled like with those at work on the road.
 
Great eco-friendly option... but what about the potential of the explosion of the compressed air if the cyclinders crack or are damaged?
 
ok, enough's enough. Electric powered cars are no more 'ecofriendly' than any other modern car. Just because you're not producing emissions out your tailpipe doesn't make it ecofriendly. You're still consuming the same amount of energy, and producing that energy comes at the cost of emissions somewhere.
That's actually not true. A coal generating station is more efficient at generating power than an internal combusion engine. So even if all our power came from coal, electric cars would still be cleaner than gas powered cars. When you take into account that most of our power comes from nuclear and hydro, that tips the scales even more in the favour of electric cars.
 
That's actually not true. A coal generating station is more efficient at generating power than an internal combusion engine. So even if all our power came from coal, electric cars would still be cleaner than gas powered cars. When you take into account that most of our power comes from nuclear and hydro, that tips the scales even more in the favour of electric cars.

And considering the trend is to build more power plants that generate electricity through renewable resources (Solar, Air, Geothermal, etc) it even further negates that argument.
 
...and you prove it to us again.

Coming from the guy who doesn't know the difference between the capacitor and a battery.....
 
From ctv.ca

450_nemo_080715.jpg
668_zenn_car_080715.jpg



Low-speed electric cars debut on Quebec roads
Updated Wed. Jul. 16 2008 8:21 AM ET

Sandie Benitah, CTV.ca News Staff

They look cool and they're super cheap but will low-speed electric cars have what it takes to rev up commuter interest?

For the first time on July 17, Quebec will make two cars available to consumers -- the urban-friendly ZENN (Zero Emissions No Noise) and the heavier Nemo. Motorists will only be allowed to drive them on public roads with a posted speed of 50 kilometres.

The move is part of a three-year pilot project sponsored by the provincial government. At the end of the term, if the project is deemed a success, then the government will have an option of extending the vehicles' run for an additional two years.

However, each Quebec municipality has the right to opt out of the pilot project, said Real Gregoire, spokesperson for the province's transportation ministry.

The vehicles don't run fast enough to compete with the regular cars on the city's main roads or highways but they should do the trick for city dwellers, said Gregoire.

The president of the Electric Vehicle Council of Ottawa said these cars are eco-friendly, efficient and a lot less expensive in the long run.

"They use far less energy, less battery power," said Juergen Weichert in an interview with CTV.ca. "There's no gas tank, no exhaust, no pistons, no radiator. Hundreds of moving parts are replaced with an electric motor and a bank of batteries. Just the labour costs alone would be a huge savings."

The ZENN costs about $15,000. For the first year, the Zenn will be available through the manufacturer in Saint-Jerome, Que., about 40 minutes from Montreal. The company plans to look at dealership locations across the province where there is a strong demand.

Weichert's organization has been pushing Canadian governments to legalize the low-speed vehicles. Up until now, B.C. has been the only province to allow them on local roads, he said.

"There are many Canadian manufacturers who make these small, lightweight cars but they can't sell it here," he said. "That's the biggest challenge."

The ZENN, manufactured in Quebec, is currently distributed in Mexico, Europe and some American states.

"We're very excited about (the pilot project)," Weichert continued. "We wish other provinces like Ontario could show that kind of leadership."

There are other challenges in making these cars a popular alternative, he said. The public has become accustomed to "hyper mobility," he said, where motorists drive long distances at high speeds.

The ZENN is a two-seat hatchback that can travel a distance of 60 kilometres on a fully charged battery. The car can reach a top speed of 40 kilometres an hour.

The Nemo, a small pick-up truck that can carry a half-ton load, can travel 115 kilometres, but also at a top speed of 40 kilometres an hour.

"If we can just scale back a little and learn to live locally, an electric car is ideal," said Weichert.

But the technology in battery power poses another challenge. While the technology is available, it's expensive. Mass production of the battery would bring the cost down but without the support of provincial governments, large-scale production is not viable.

Ontario, home to Canada's flailing auto industry, is the latest province to show some interest in testing out the lightweight electric cars.

Eco-activist groups put the pressure on Ontario Premier Dalton McGuinty at Toronto's Green Living Show in April by circulating a petition asking him to change the laws to allow low-speed cars on the road.

McGuinty was quoted in the media shortly after the show, saying that the laws need to be balanced so that they don't impede the province's responsibility to the environment. He was expected to discuss the matter with Donna Cansfield, Ontario's transport minister.

"The public wants these options right now but regulators aren't allowing us to do this," said Weichert.

He pointed to the recent job cuts at General Motors as a reason for Ontario to pursue electric vehicles.

"SUVs are on the way out, that's been proven," Weichert said. "Auto plants are shutting down. Why do all of these people have to be out of a job when they can be building these cars?"

Gregoire told CTV.ca that there were a number of reasons why the Quebec government decided to pursue this route.

"We had to try and find other systems to help us fight greenhouse gas emissions," he said. "With the price of oil being so high, this was a great reason to try this."

He said researchers will try to determine how efficient and practical the car is.

"It's a great opportunity for investment," he said. "But first we will have to see if it's economically viable before we can adopt it formally."
 
Holy panel gaps Bat Man!
 
Love the truck, but the car is hideous. Environmentally friendly doesn't have to be dowdy. Why couldn't that little Zen be a looker?
 
Maybe the hood's not closed properly in the pic. Stranger things have happened...

I think that's all it is, the hood is still open on one side (looks closed on the other). But even the panel gaps between fixed panels is pretty wide.

I think it's weird that the design language it speaks is cheap and somewhat disposable. I feel like automotive design, especially 'sustainable' automobiles, should be substantial, and feel (and especially look) well crafted.
 

Back
Top