Toronto Minto30Roe Condos | 113.08m | 34s | Minto Group | Wallman Architects

[someMidTowner]

Oct 22:

 

[Roundabout]

October 29th (and for comparison, a photo from April 24th, 2015):

 

[salsa]

 

[Roundabout]

November 13th:

 

[cruzin4u]

Horrendous.

 

[stjames2queenwest]

The colour is pretty blah. But I like the floor plate, boxes with slight adjustments can be interesting. But yea just too monotonous and grey.

 

[WislaHD]

What were Wallman thinking?

Even if Minto Group constrained them heavily, surely they could have figured out a different colour scheme or something?

E Condos needs to rise quickly to block out the view from this.

 

[urbandreamer]

OMG it's hideous

 

[Roundabout]

December 17th:

 

[WislaHD]

I like the corner balconies on this.

 

[salsa]

Hard to decide which of the three highrises look the worst.

 

[interchange42]

Not for me. I'm normally a fan of Wallman Architects' buildings, but this one's even worse than Neon (to the left), and while I don't think a comparison to the 1970s rental on the right is particularly useful, I prefer it to 30Roe too.

42

 

[Roundabout]

January 8th:

 

[ProjectEnd]

Not for me. I'm normally a fan of Wallman Architects' buildings, but this one's even worse than Neon (to the left), and while I don't think a comparison to the 1970s rental on the right is particularly useful, I prefer it to 30Roe too.

42

I'd say Neon is easily the worst out of that trio. This hulking battleship is hardly svelte but it is better than that G+C garbage. The clear winner for me is the 70's brute.

 

[someMidTowner]

Today: