Toronto Imperial Plaza | 96.01m | 23s | Camrost-Felcorp | Onespace

From Rosedale Station

imperialm11.jpg
 
Is that the south side? I was by there on the streetcar last week and it I could have sworn most of the windows on the front (north side) were gone.
 
Has anyone been by here lately? It looks like they've replaced the green glass up top with an aqua-green type spandrel.

You asked and you received Aug 11
9549513660_c0f0e050f7_b.jpg


9549561838_f8585ef12a_b.jpg


9549569128_c75b412f78_b.jpg


6283858245_0910efec25_b.jpg


9546726839_0791fae9f0_b.jpg
 
Has anyone been by here lately? It looks like they've replaced the green glass up top with an aqua-green type spandrel.

Another example in which the current heritage system doesn't work. A report was issued on August 18, 2011, "Intention to Designate", (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-40063.pdf), and the building is currently designated, presumably with a Heritage Easement Agreement. http://app.toronto.ca/HeritagePreservation/details.do?folderRsn=2432359&propertyRsn=202877

In any case, this spandralization of the PH has totally ruined the aesthetics of the tower (even more than the colour change) by replacing the verticality of the original design into a series of punched windows. This is one case where large vertical pieces of curtain-wall should have been used. It's as if the City permitted the copper roof of the Old City Hall to be replaced with asphalt shingles. Why is there no aesthetic control when it comes to Modernist buildings?
 
Last edited:

Back
Top