News   Apr 26, 2024
 1.4K     4 
News   Apr 26, 2024
 317     0 
News   Apr 26, 2024
 871     0 

Miscellany Toronto Photographs: Then and Now

Two views of Carlton and Yonge pre: reconfiguration:

Looking east:

Carlton_Street_from_Yonge.jpg


Looking west:

CarltonViewofCollegeStreetStoreUnderConstruction.jpg


Goad atlas 1910:

carltonyongegoad.jpg


Two aerials from 1930:

f1244_it10054.jpg
f1244_it10055.jpg
 
Last edited:
Disheartening to lose those beautiful structures
Keep in mind that when we're dealing w/circa 1930 as opposed to circa 1960/70/80, there's an element of "excusability" to such loss. (Maybe what's more disheartening is how we've lost so much of what these "beautiful structures" were lost on behalf of, robbing Toronto of a more cohesive "Deco district" opportunity)
 
Keep in mind that when we're dealing w/circa 1930 as opposed to circa 1960/70/80, there's an element of "excusability" to such loss. (Maybe what's more disheartening is how we've lost so much of what these "beautiful structures" were lost on behalf of, robbing Toronto of a more cohesive "Deco district" opportunity)
One positive outcome architecturally from the reconfiguration was the streamlined moderne Kresge building on the new curved lot created on the SE corner. The rendering below and the photos taken in 1950 and 1952 show that the Methodist church survived at least until then. Unfortunately, both gone now.

f1257_s1057_it0835.jpg



s0574_fl0021_id49409.jpg


kresge's.jpg



s-l1600.jpg
 
In about 1923 the Ontario Ministry of Education made a film about the benefits of "consilodated" schools in rural areas. It highlighted the disadvantages of isolated one-room schoolhouses, and the benefits of busing rural students to larger schools.

The full film ("The Rugged Road to Learning"):

A colorized version of a short exerpt from inside the school:

What might be of interest to the followers of this thread is that the rural school in the film is in northern Etobicoke. The old one-room schoolhouse is the Smithfield school, which stood on the north side of Albion Road, between Martin Grove and Highway 27, precisely where Albion and Silverstone Drive now meet (on the NE corner of the current intersection).

The film follows a group of students as they trek to school in the morning, spend a less than fruitful time at school, and then trudge back home. (This school day is then contrasted with modern education in an impressive new building, and encourages all rural residents to take a stand in favour of consolidation.)

What I'm wondering is whether any of the places in the film can be identified. Of course, the outdoor scenes could have been shot anywhere, maybe nowhere near Toronto. But there are some scenes that were clearly shot in front of the school, and it may be reasonable to assume it would have been easier to do all the shooting on location.

If that's so, then the scenes should all be around Albion and Martin Grove. Are the roads in the film Albion and Martin Grove themselves? The neighbouring schools would have been in Woodbridge (Hwy 7) to the north, Claireville (427) to the west, Highfield (Rexdale Blvd) to the south, and Thistletown (Islington Ave.) to the east, so presumably the area within these locations is where the students are seen walking.

Unfortunately, there are no landmark buildings out in the country. In fact, there isn't much of anything. Perhaps most identifiable would be the telegraph poles, which differ along different roads. There is little relief in the landscape, and only a few building, so really not much to go on.

I'm including some stills from the film in case anyone wants to have a shot at identifying the views.

Smithfield 02.jpg


Smithfield 03.jpg

Smithfield 04.jpg

Smithfield 05.jpg


Smithfield 06.jpg


Smithfield 07.jpg


Smithfield 08.jpg


Smithfield 09.jpg


Smithfield 10.jpg


Smithfield 11.jpg


Smithfield 12.jpg


Smithfield 13.jpg



Smithfield 14.jpg
 
In about 1923 the Ontario Ministry of Education made a film about the benefits of "consilodated" schools in rural areas. It highlighted the disadvantages of isolated one-room schoolhouses, and the benefits of busing rural students to larger schools.

The full film ("The Rugged Road to Learning"):

A colorized version of a short exerpt from inside the school:

What might be of interest to the followers of this thread is that the rural school in the film is in northern Etobicoke. The old one-room schoolhouse is the Smithfield school, which stood on the north side of Albion Road, between Martin Grove and Highway 27, precisely where Albion and Silverstone Drive now meet (on the NE corner of the current intersection).

The film follows a group of students as they trek to school in the morning, spend a less than fruitful time at school, and then trudge back home. (This school day is then contrasted with modern education in an impressive new building, and encourages all rural residents to take a stand in favour of consolidation.)

What I'm wondering is whether any of the places in the film can be identified. Of course, the outdoor scenes could have been shot anywhere, maybe nowhere near Toronto. But there are some scenes that were clearly shot in front of the school, and it may be reasonable to assume it would have been easier to do all the shooting on location.

If that's so, then the scenes should all be around Albion and Martin Grove. Are the roads in the film Albion and Martin Grove themselves? The neighbouring schools would have been in Woodbridge (Hwy 7) to the north, Claireville (427) to the west, Highfield (Rexdale Blvd) to the south, and Thistletown (Islington Ave.) to the east, so presumably the area within these locations is where the students are seen walking.

Unfortunately, there are no landmark buildings out in the country. In fact, there isn't much of anything. Perhaps most identifiable would be the telegraph poles, which differ along different roads. There is little relief in the landscape, and only a few building, so really not much to go on.

I'm including some stills from the film in case anyone wants to have a shot at identifying the views.

View attachment 537593

View attachment 537594
View attachment 537595
View attachment 537596

View attachment 537597

View attachment 537598

View attachment 537599

View attachment 537600

View attachment 537601

View attachment 537602

View attachment 537603

View attachment 537604


View attachment 537605
Well, that is fascinating. My ex went to a one room school house north of Acton, Ontario in the 1960’s. It was two miles, not kilometres, there and two miles back. Sometimes they got a ride, in a car. They started in Grade
1.
The current thought is that children should be allowed risky play, in the news recently. The walk to school was risky, their lunch hour was to their own devices outside, often risky games. The girls had stockings on, I don’t know how any of the children didn’t end up with frostbite.
Consolidation happened in 1965.
 
Migawd, such a life would be considered child abuse today.

I would imagine one factor that stood in the way of consolidating rural schools as far back as the 1930s was the lack of municipal capacity to maintain the roads during the winter.

The walk to school was risky, their lunch hour was to their own devices outside, often risky games. The girls had stockings on, I don’t know how any of the children didn’t end up with frostbite.
It's that type of thinking that has brought us to the point where 'risky play' is considered some new type of social development.
 
I walk my 4 year old the 900m to school every day in all types of weather. My mum did it to me and somehow I survived, imagine that! I think my daughter will make it, too.

It makes me think of that advertisement years ago where the escalator stops and people call for help. Kids need to shed the bubble wrap, run in flip flops once, and maybe lick a door handle now and then. It'll build character and probably immunity ;)
 
Migawd, such a life would be considered child abuse today.

I would imagine one factor that stood in the way of consolidating rural schools as far back as the 1930s was the lack of municipal capacity to maintain the roads during the winter.


It's that type of thinking that has brought us to the point where 'risky play' is considered some new type of social development.
I should have put the word risky in quotation marks. The kids were free to explore and take risks and play all day. We used to jump off our parents garage roofs, in summer!, no snow to cushion the landing. No helicopter parents. They just played and socialized.
 
I should have put the word risky in quotation marks. The kids were free to explore and take risks and play all day. We used to jump off our parents garage roofs, in summer!, no snow to cushion the landing. No helicopter parents. They just played and socialized.
The most famous childhood memory of myself and two confreres to this day was one of them shooting the other with an arrow while sitting in a tree. Not a kid's bow and arrow set - a real one (the lesson of safe carry was learned).

We used to be gone for the day and return an absolute mess. So long as we returned with all the parts we left with the parents were good. Our haunt was an area we used to call 'shadowbrook', which was untamed valley land for the West Branch of the Don River what would now G. Ross Lord park. A golf course - I think it was called Meadowbrook (not certain) fronted Bathurst and backed onto this valley land.

We would also (gasp) go tobogganing.

Full circle - One of the guys did the concrete pour calculations for the G. Ross Lord dam during his summer job while in university.
 
My only rule was to be in by the time the street lights illuminated!
 
Here are a few views from Front & George from 1894 and today. The brick building at SW corner of Front and George was the McIntosh Warehouse - this caught fire in July 1902 and 5 firemen were killed, still the largest number to die in one fire, I think. The site is now occupied by Times Square condo and several Co-ops. The 1894 Royal Hotel is now the parking lot in front of Cora's. (Also, note that the section of the current row of houses on north side of Front is partially rebuilt, only the western buildings are original.)

Note the bales of hay on carts on Front Street, they are lining up for the Public Weigh House that was the small building in the middle of the road at Jarvis. Photo below!

IMG_2534.JPG

1894-c.jpg

and
1894 photo_fixed.jpg

and finally the weigh house!

Weighhouse.jpg
 

Back
Top