News   May 17, 2024
 1.6K     2 
News   May 17, 2024
 956     2 
News   May 17, 2024
 7.8K     9 

Island airline gets cash from GE

Re: Downtown Bulletin: Can Porker Air Really Fly?

The Toronto Port Authority is up in arms about the Jazz announcement saying that Jazz doesn't have a valid operating agreement. Jazz says it never cancelled the old one and was simply evicted from the one terminal. Now that it has an agreement with another property it should be good to go.

Quote from TPA press release in the spring:
"On Feb.13, we provided them with a Commercial Carrier Operators Agreement in anticipation of successful negotiations with either of these two tenants."

Quote from today's Toronto Star online:
"But the Toronto Port Authority, the federally appointed agency that oversees the island airport, said Jazz's previous operating agreement is no longer valid and a new agreement must be reached before it can resume service."

Seems to be some backtracking now that Jazz has surprised them with a deal giving them access to the airport. This is going to be fun to watch. Porter and the TPA improve access to the airport and a Porter controlled company evicts Jazz. Jazz comes back with a vengence and Porter gets their ass handed to them because of its frequent flyer program and partners. Jazz reduces flights back to more sustainable levels and TPA is stuck with the tab for the new ferry and connection buildings with no extra revenue to pay for it. :D Things will be interesting at Toronto Island for the next 18 months :) .
 
Link to article: Can airport handle 2 carriers?

Can airport handle 2 carriers?
By ROB GRANATSTEIN

Two airlines, flying 20 times a day to Ottawa, plus Montreal and other destinations out of a little airport on the waterfront -- can this possibly work?

Aviation analyst Joseph D'Cruz believes success is possible, saying the City Centre Airport offers a huge time advantage over the "dreadful" Pearson Airport.

At Pearson you can taxi on the runway for 20 minutes, while at the island you can be in the air 10 minutes after checking in, he said.

With Air Canada Jazz and Porter Airlines offering more flights, the airport becomes more attractive, D'Cruz said.

If there is a price war, Porter will be in a dogfight to survive from the start, he said.

PORTER 'CONFIDENT'

"But competition tends to increase the market," he said. "Whether it grows enough, that's an open question."

Robert Deluce, Porter CEO, said his company has studied the market for five years and knows the business is there.

As for how much business?

"We'll find out in due course," Deluce said. "Porter is very committed to the Toronto City Centre Airport and we're very well financed.

"We're very confident we have the resources we'll need to compete," he said.

D'Cruz believes Porter has some advantages in this competition with Air Canada.

Porter's plane, the 70-seat Bombardier Q400, is bigger, newer, quieter and smoother than Jazz's Dash 8.

What Porter doesn't have is the power of Air Canada or Aeroplan.
 
Re: Downtown Bulletin: Can Porker Air Really Fly?

With management like this is it any wonder the airport loses money?
 
Re: Downtown Bulletin: Can Porker Air Really Fly?

IMO, it's silly to have a sea Port Authority involved in airport matters.
 
Re: Downtown Bulletin: Can Porker Air Really Fly?

^
If they changed their name, would it make you feel better?
 
Re: Downtown Bulletin: Can Porker Air Really Fly?

You'd better let the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey know really quick, so they can unload Kennedy, LaGuardia and Newark airports.
 
Re: Downtown Bulletin: Can Porker Air Really Fly?

Nice. Double burn.
 
Re: Downtown Bulletin: Can Porker Air Really Fly?

Google:

"Toronto Pork Authority": 18 results

"Port Authoritarians": 33 results
 
Re: Downtown Bulletin: Can Porker Air Really Fly?

If they changed their name, would it make you feel better?
I'd feel better if the TPA was abolished. Toronto is hardly a port at all, spare a few dozen freight vessels per year. The TPA no longer serves a purpose, let the city manage it's waterfront directly.
 
Re: Downtown Bulletin: Can Porker Air Really Fly?

From the Globe. How low can the one-person board Pork Authority Go?

Port Authority threatens to ban Jazz from airport

OLIVER MOORE

The Toronto Port Authority is threatening to ban Air Canada discount carrier Jazz from the island airport, asserting that a new deal must be reached.

"We are concerned that Jazz is apparently selling tickets," reads a statement from Port Authority CEO Lisa Raitt. "We have repeatedly told you that we will not permit Jazz to operate to or from the TCCA until you have entered into a contract with us."

Jazz spokeswoman Debra Williams said that flights would go ahead as scheduled, possibly starting Aug. 28.
 
Re: Downtown Bulletin: Can Porker Air Really Fly?

Things certainly smell fishy at the TPA. Hopefully this court case will go somewhere and acutally give the public a look into the seemingly corrupt operations of the TPA.

-----------------

Jazz to resume service at Toronto City Centre Airport on August 28, 2006
HALIFAX, July 7 /CNW/ - The following letter was sent today to Ms. Lisa Raitt, President and Chief Executive Officer, Toronto Port Authority from Joseph Randell, President and Chief Executive Officer, Air Canada Jazz.

July 7, 2006

Ms. Lisa Raitt
President and Chief Executive Officer
Toronto Port Authority
60 Harbour Street
Toronto, ON M5J 1B7

Dear Ms. Raitt:

Re: Toronto City Centre Airport
-------------------------------


We continue to be extremely disappointed by the TPA's actions, most recently with the misleading account in your letter of July 6, 2006. You indicate that you are surprised that Jazz plans to recommence operations at the Toronto City Centre Airport (TCCA) with service to both Ottawa and Montreal. Ever since Jazz was evicted from the TCCA in February 2006, we have been very specific, and have repeatedly reiterated, in all of our communications with the TPA, that Jazz intended to resume service at the earliest possible date. In addition, yesterday's announcement follows a press release made by Air Canada on February 2, 2006, which stated, "With the improved access to Toronto City Centre Airport, Air Canada will pursue a substantial increase of frequencies between that airport and Ottawa as well as the reinstatement of flights to and from Montreal". It therefore baffles us that you could possibly be surprised.
It seems that the TPA simply cannot make up its mind. On the one hand, it says it wants to expand the TCCA's commercial carrier operations by going forward with a $15 million facility enhancement to improve access to the airport, and yet, on the other hand, it is going to excessive lengths to try to stop the only commercial carrier with a firm date and a 16 years operating history from recommencing service. In a story in today's Toronto Sun you are quoted as saying, "We do want Jazz back". This blatant contradiction is curious and absolutely puzzling.
We would also like to remind you, once again, that it was never Jazz's choice to suspend service at the TCCA. This decision was made only after it was apparent that alternative facilities would not be available to Jazz before our eviction date from the City Centre Aviation Limited facility. Despite repeated appeals to the TPA for assistance to accommodate Jazz, none was forthcoming. As a result, our employees, customers and the traveling public have been greatly inconvenienced by this lengthy service suspension, which you now seem determined to unnecessarily further prolong.
With respect to the commercial carrier operating agreement (CCOA), the fact of the matter is that our existing CCOA has effectively governed our relationship for years and remains in force. The TPA cannot unilaterally terminate this agreement; indeed, there is no reason for it to do so, especially in the absence of agreement on new terms. Jazz has rejected your attempts to unilaterally force us to sign a new unduly restrictive draft CCOA with conditions that are contrary to the TPA's obligations under the Canada Marine Act, and we have brought an application in the Federal Court to set aside the TPA's purported illegal actions. As you know, the TPA required Jazz to sign a highly unusual confidentiality agreement prior to even receiving the draft CCOA, something virtually unheard of in matters between airlines and public airport authorities. Through our negotiations, you are certainly aware of our objections to the terms you are seeking to impose, which would threaten the viability of our operations at the TCCA. You should also be aware that Mr. Roger Tassé has agreed to review your draft CCOA as part of his broader review of the operations and management of the TCCA.
In a Canadian Press story from yesterday, it was reported that you indicated that the draft CCOA only needs some terms finalized and you are quoted as saying, "It wouldn't take very long". We find this comment puzzling given that Jazz provided you with detailed comments on your draft CCOA on March 16, 2006, following our meeting on the subject on March 2, 2006, and Jazz has yet to receive a substantive response to these comments after almost four months, despite repeated written requests made to the TPA.
In the interests of accountability and transparency, we urge the TPA to lift the shroud of secrecy surrounding the draft CCOA so that all stakeholders, potential operators and taxpayers can better understand the TPA's true plans for commercial service at the TCCA.
You state in your letter that "The TPA's mandate is to ensure the orderly operation and long-term viability of the TCCA". Airport authorities that are concerned with their viability promote access and welcome options for the public they serve. They don't discourage access, limit use, or constrain available capacity.
The sum of your actions appear to be nothing but a thinly veiled and orchestrated attempt to restrict Jazz's operations at the TCCA and, in doing so, establish a virtual monopoly at the TCCA for a single corporate interest. It appears that you have concluded that the only way to ensure the "long term viability of the TCCA" is the establishment of a monopoly operator with the TPA's full and unmitigated support. That position is not only contrary to the duties of a federal public agency, it is also contrary to the public interest.
Until such time as a new and proper CCOA is negotiated, a development Jazz would welcome, or the Federal Court rules, Jazz will continue to operate under the existing CCOA which remains in force and ensures orderly operations. Jazz has every intention of recommencing services at the TCCA on August 28, 2006 as announced.

Yours truly,


Joseph D. Randell
President and Chief Executive Officer

cc: The Honourable Lawrence Cannon, PC, MP, Minister of Transport, Infrastructure and Communities
 
Re: Downtown Bulletin: Can Porker Air Really Fly?

Jazz has every intention of recommencing services at the TCCA on August 28, 2006 as announced.

Jazz forced to delay island air relaunch
Takeoff was Aug. 28: Port Authority will not approve terminal deal

Chris Sorensen
National Post
Wednesday, August 09, 2006

People who booked flights on Jazz out of the island airport can fly out of Pearson airport or get a full refund, the airline said yesterday.

Torontonians hoping to take advantage of Jazz's beefed-up service to Ottawa and Montreal from the island airport this month will have to wait a little longer.

The regional airline, a subsidiary of Air Canada, said yesterday it has been forced to delay the reinstatement of flights from the Toronto City Centre Airport, planned for Aug. 28, because the airfield's operator, the Toronto Port Authority (TPA), has refused to approve a sublease needed for Jazz to move into a new terminal.

While that may be good news for condo owners along the city's waterfront, some of whom are opposed to the further development of the airport, it will no doubt create headaches for passengers who had already booked tickets for the flights. Jazz said yesterday that passengers holding tickets for the affected flights will have the option of flying out of Pearson International Airport or receiving a full refund.

The cancellations come barely a month after Jazz held a news conference at a downtown hotel to announce it was returning to the island airport after being evicted from its old terminal in February by a company controlled by Toronto businessman Robert Deluce. He is attempting to launch Porter Airlines from the island airport this fall.

That led some observers to wonder whether Jazz may be losing the public's sympathy for its side in the dispute just as Porter begins to roll out its marketing campaign.

"This is clumsy handling on Jazz's part," said Joseph D'Cruz, a business professor at the University of Toronto's Rotman School of Management, who has been following the dispute closely. "They shouldn't have made the decision to start selling tickets while this thing was still unresolved."

Jazz blamed the TPA, which it dubbed "intransigent" for its failure to approve the sublease agreement. "The actions of the TPA breach its obligations under federal law, and are so contrary to industry practice that they were virtually inconceivable when we announced the recommencement of services on July 6," said Joseph Randell, the CEO of Jazz, in a statement.

Mr. Randell also accused the port authority of playing favourites by requiring Jazz to sign a "secret" operating agreement that is designed to benefit "a single corporate interest" -- a reference to Mr. Deluce's Porter Airlines, which is planning to launch from the airport with 10 weekday flights to Ottawa. Jazz has refused to sign the agreement and is challenging the TPA's conduct in a federal court.

Lisa Raitt, the CEO of the port authority, said yesterday the review of Jazz's sublease arrangement is normal procedure. As for the operating agreement, she said the deal the TPA signed with Porter -- which presumably covers such things as take-off and landing times and access to airport facilities -- does not permit the current schedule that Jazz is proposing.

In a letter to Mr. Randell last month, the TPA blamed Jazz for the airport's financial troubles, saying the airline had repeatedly cut back on operations and failed to invest in its facilities over its 16 years of service -- a situation that forced it to look for another long-term airline partner.

"We've told Jazz that we're happy to have them come and operate [a schedule] at the Toronto City Centre Airport like the one they've operated for the past two or three years," she said, adding that the port authority is obligated to take steps to ensure the financial viability of the airport. "But that's something not acceptable to them, obviously, because they've been rejecting it."

Mayor David Miller, whose 2003 election campaign included a pledge to stop the TPA from building a bridge to connect the airport to the mainland, has previously expressed concern with the TPA's efforts to expand the airport over the cries of some local residents and community groups.

The federal government recently ordered an investigation of the way the TPA operates.

csorensen@nationalpost.com

IN THE AIR

FEB. 8, 2002 Robert Deluce, who once owned Air Ontario and served as president of Canada 3000, unveils a plan for a turboprop airline that will fly out of the island airport.

NOV. 28, 2002 City council votes in favour of building a bridge to Toronto island that paves the way for a massive expansion of its airport.

OCTOBER, 2003 Community Airport Impact Review (Community AIR), a local group opposed to the airport's expansion, requests a judicial review of the Toronto Port Authority's (TPA) environmental assessment of a proposed bridge to the island.

NOV. 10, 2003 David Miller rides promises to clean up City Hall and stop the expansion of the island airport to victory and wins the Toronto mayoral race. David Collenette, the federal Transport Minister, suggests the following day he is willing to let the bridge plan die.

NOV. 27, 2003 Mr. Deluce's Regional Airlines Holdings Inc. threatens to sue the city for $500-million if officials reverse a decision to permit the bridge.

DEC. 3, 2003 City councillors vote to scrap the bridge.

JAN. 7, 2004 Mr. Deluce and his backers launch a $500-million lawsuit against the city.

MAY 3, 2005 The federal government announces a $35-million settlement with the TPA.

FEB. 1, 2006 Mr. Deluce reveals he has revived his controversial plan to launch an airline out of the island airport. The move comes after the TPA says it will purchase a new ferry and renovate its terminal facilities.

FEB. 15, 2006 Air Canada Jazz says it will temporarily suspend all flights to and from the island airport after failing to renegotiate a lease agreement with a company controlled by Mr. Deluce. Jazz's subsequent legal challenge is thrown out of court.

JULY 6, 2006 Air Canada Jazz announces it will resume operations at the Toronto City Centre Airport on Aug. 28, after securing a new terminal.

AUG. 8, 2006 Jazz says it is forced to temporarily delay plans to return to the island airport, citing the TPA's failure to approve its new sublease arrangement with one of the airport's other fixed-base operators.

Ran with fact box "In the Air" which has been appended to the story.

© National Post 2006
 
Re: Downtown Bulletin: Can Porker Air Really Fly?

I walked Harbourfront from Jarvis to Bathurst today and had a close look at the construction going on at TCCA. The hangar next to the terminal now has a "porter" logo on it. The new terminal on the mainland is well along, with the exterior almost done. Work on the new slip for the new ferry continues, and skybridges to allow loading and unloading directly to and from the 2nd floor of the ferry complete both there and on the island. The western gap can get really choppy so I wonder about the comfort level for passengers travelling higher up in a swaying boat.

Although I'm no fan of the TPA and how they handle their business matters, I can't help but wonder what Air Canada was thinking when they announced the return of flights this month. There isn't even a passenger terminal for people to use, the place is a construction site, and to reach the temporary ferry berth you now have to go search for it down a narrow path through a playground and park. It's as if they didn't even think to phone the TPA and ask if new passenger flights were feasible.

Someone with a camera (unlike me) should go and snap some photos of the new terminal and construction.
 
Re: Downtown Bulletin: Can Porker Air Really Fly?

simple enough -

1. AC knew Porter wouldn't have their AOC by then so they were getting the jump on them by hoovering up the advance bookings - which they are now offering to rebook via Pearson (see 2)

2. They knew it would fire up the anti-airport people. AC want the business traffic so as long as the island is open they will want to fly from there but I doubt they will shed a single tear if it closes as people will just go to Pearson and fly on their more cost effective A320 fleet.

The Island Airport saga has exposed a most venal side of Toronto - Miller and Chow's pandering, AC's monopolism, CommunityAir's NIMBYness, Porter's greed and TPA's incompetence.

I still think it should stay open though - just under a better class of management, with a nice Calatrava bridge running TTC vehicles across it, with AC buying new Q400s to keep jobs in Toronto and with Porter keeping AC's fares honest. We might just end up with a London City Airport (sans jets) by the end of it and next time I fly to Ottawa I can change at Bathurst for the streetcar and hope that the Pickering pave-over is delayed a little longer.
 
Re: Downtown Bulletin: Can Porker Air Really Fly?

There's significant opposition to the London City airport as it is causing significant problems for the redevelopment of the Docklands/Thames Gateway area, both in terms of noise and height limits.
 

Back
Top