pstogios
Senior Member
Aaaannnnddd here's my article.
Things got a bit...snippy at one point.
Kennedy and McLaughlin LRT EA Study funded by council
What a waste of taxpayers money.
Aaaannnnddd here's my article.
Things got a bit...snippy at one point.
Kennedy and McLaughlin LRT EA Study funded by council
Don't the Kennedy and McLaughlin routes do significantly more damage to commercial and residential properties along Steeles east or west than Main, which did almost none at all? Weren't those routes already rejected on those grounds? WTF?
Let's be clear.
The Main route was rejected because rich residential property owners in the downtown area complained loudly to (and maybe paid off) their councillors. Councillors said "yes masters" and don't actually care about impacts to speed, and convenience in the approach to the GO station, parkland, commercial or industrial properties in any of the alternative routes.
The bottom line is any alternative route besides Main is acceptable to these corrupt councillors, so talking about the relative suitability of the Kennedy vs McLaughlin alignments, both of which are totally ridiculous, or trying to understand the thought process of these councillors, is a waste of time.
Let's be clear.
The Main route was rejected because rich residential property owners in the downtown area complained loudly to (and maybe paid off) their councillors. Councillors said "yes masters" and don't actually care about impacts to speed, and convenience in the approach to the GO station, parkland, commercial or industrial properties in any of the alternative routes.
The bottom line is any alternative route besides Main is acceptable to these corrupt councillors, so talking about the relative suitability of the Kennedy vs McLaughlin alignments, both of which are totally ridiculous, or trying to understand the thought process of these councillors, is a waste of time.
If we're choosing between bad options, McLaughlin is the least-bad of the bunch. At least that way the LRT could have a direct connection to Sheridan, which is/could be a pretty significant trip generator. Bringing RT to post-secondary institutions is a pretty common goal across the GTHA: York University is getting a subway, UTSC is hopefully getting the Scarborough-Malvern LRT, Mohawk is getting the A-Line BRT, McMaster is getting the B-Line LRT, and I'm sure there are others that I'm forgetting at the moment.
The connection to Sheridan is the clear (and possibly only) advantage that the McLaughlin route has....the obvious advantage that Kennedy has is that the stretch of Kennedy from Steeles to Queen is likely the 2nd most "redevelopable" main corridor in Brampton....so it may come down to those choices (or, of course, the third choice of leaving the terminus at Steeles and Main and pump up the Zum/Bus connections to there).If we're choosing between bad options, McLaughlin is the least-bad of the bunch. At least that way the LRT could have a direct connection to Sheridan, which is/could be a pretty significant trip generator. Bringing RT to post-secondary institutions is a pretty common goal across the GTHA: York University is getting a subway, UTSC is hopefully getting the Scarborough-Malvern LRT, Mohawk is getting the A-Line BRT, McMaster is getting the B-Line LRT, and I'm sure there are others that I'm forgetting at the moment.
It is only a waste of money if you assume that there will be no LRT north of Steeles at all. Council ended consideration of the Main route a while ago.....so if the desire is to connect the LRT to the Brampton GO station you have to find another route......if you are going to find another route, I guess, you have to spend some cash to figure out which of the other routes is "best".What a waste of taxpayers money.
Oh I get all of that. Definitely something stinky there. But now on top of the wasted time, now we're talking millions of $$$s wasted as well. I hope people do the right thing and vote some of these jokers (Councillors) out in the next election, albeit 4 years late imo. It's time for new blood and for Brampton to join the 21st century.
Don't the Kennedy and McLaughlin routes do significantly more damage to commercial and residential properties along Steeles east or west than Main, which did almost none at all? Weren't those routes already rejected on those grounds? WTF?
If you include the Mayor, 6 of the 11 members of council are new as of the 2014 election. If changing for fresh eyes is all it took...the "new guys" have a majority
Aside from the fact the last vote against Main was 7-4, there was no need to mention that because I was simply responding to post that repeated the old theme of "throw those guys out...new guys will fix it"...all I was saying was...don't be so sure...the new guys hold the majority in Brampton council and yet, the vote against the Main alignment only shifted from 10-1 against (with the "1" being the former mayor who was the biggest target of the the "change is needed" crowd before the last election) to 7-4 against.....so 3 of the new guys also voted against Main.You neglect to mention that most (4 of 6) that voted against the LRT on Main were NOT newly elected in 2014.
The old guard decided that vote. Which is precisely why they have to go.
The thing with all this is that Brampton City Council is assuming they will do this study and the province/Mx will go along with it. I'm not sure that's going to happen.
It's easy to see that not going along main adds 2.8km to the route, and once HLRT is done to Steeles, there will be tangible scenes of people shuttling between Brampton GO, buses and HLRT, all with exhaustion in their faces saying 'why the hell am I doing this crazy transfer?!' It will seed frustration, and if Brampton City Council keeps arguing for the go-around it could spark significant pushback.
I think it will turn into a game of seeing who blinks first. But a change in provincial government is the big wildcard here.