mpd618
Active Member
This is great!Updated GO track ownership post Guelph sub transaction.
There are a lot of challenging things that are possible. Or expensive things that can nevertheless be purchased.(no further increase in ownership possible)
This is great!Updated GO track ownership post Guelph sub transaction.
There are a lot of challenging things that are possible. Or expensive things that can nevertheless be purchased.(no further increase in ownership possible)
There are a lot of challenging things that are possible. Or expensive things that can nevertheless be purchased.
They may purchase new subs as well, such as the line that goes to Orangeville. Liberals promised GO train service there during the election so that may happen, even if its the long term.
The Liberals actually promised quite a bit of rail expansion as they were planning to use DMUs instead of the full locomotives, doing that makes extensions like Orangeville, Uxbridge, Bolton, Etc. a lot more feasible. Of course whether it happens or not remains to be seen.
OrangevilleCitizen said:Similarly, all the talk at Queen’s Park about improving GO Transit’s rail services, through electrification and ultimately 15-minute service at peak periods on most of the lines, isn’t accompanied by any acknowledgment of a need for even minimal rail service out of Orangeville and Alliston.
› GO service expansion: We will look at providing more GO options to connect
Brantford, the Niagara region, Dufferin County, and other regions outside the
GTHA to the GTHA.
they had something in the platform about extending rail transit to the likes of Brantford and Dufferin County, which essentially has to mean Orangeville. they didn't discuss it much and nobody seemed to notice it, but it was there.
The exact qoute:
it means that they will at least conduct a feasibility study on it..
Short answer, no.I brought this up in the Fantasy thread but this may be an appropriate place for the question too:
Was the GEXR line that runs from just west of Guelph to Cambridge included in the GEXR purchase last month?
Or was it just the main line to Kitchener? The reason I ask is that this routing, at least on the surface, seems like a more likely candidate to bring GO rail service to Cambridge than an extension of the Milton line service, with that being on CP's main freight line and all. What's the condition of that track right now? Is it in pretty decent shape, or is it borderline abandoned?
For those wondering, the idea that I had is that there would be a semi-express service that would run from Union to Georgetown, and then run local to Guelph. There the service would split, with one branch going to Kitchener and the other to Cambridge. This way you not only avoid CP entirely, but you maximize the use of any improvements you do along the Kitchener line, particularly east of Guelph. But naturally, this set up depends on the ownership, availability, and condition of that line (don't know the name of it, if someone does please let me know), hence my question above.
I brought this up in the Fantasy thread but this may be an appropriate place for the question too:
Was the GEXR line that runs from just west of Guelph to Cambridge included in the GEXR purchase last month? Or was it just the main line to Kitchener? The reason I ask is that this routing, at least on the surface, seems like a more likely candidate to bring GO rail service to Cambridge than an extension of the Milton line service, with that being on CP's main freight line and all. What's the condition of that track right now? Is it in pretty decent shape, or is it borderline abandoned?
For those wondering, the idea that I had is that there would be a semi-express service that would run from Union to Georgetown, and then run local to Guelph. There the service would split, with one branch going to Kitchener and the other to Cambridge. This way you not only avoid CP entirely, but you maximize the use of any improvements you do along the Kitchener line, particularly east of Guelph. But naturally, this set up depends on the ownership, availability, and condition of that line (don't know the name of it, if someone does please let me know), hence my question above.
I believe this would be a candidate for GO or some other regional service between the tri-cities and Guelph, I agree, but as dunkalunk pointed out, there are serious challenges. This is a good illustration of them.
I'm somwhat surprised that the Fergus Spur (remnant of the former Fergus Subdivision that went to Palmerston from Lyndon Jct through Galt and Guelph) still exists. There's only one active customer left between Guelph Junction and Highway 401. AGS, the most important customer on the spurlines in Cambridge south of the 401, is gone.
It'd make a great rail trail.
I simply don't see a need for rail service between Cambridge and Guelph, especially on the Fergus Spur. There isn't even a direct bus service right now, though there should be. (The best route right now is taking GO Route 25 from the SmartCentres stop to Aberfoyle P&R and transferring to GO Route 29, not all that useful. The Aberfoyle stop is a lousy place to wait for a bus). Much of the demand between Guelph and Cambridge is likely heade to/from to U of G, not Downtown Guelph.
The ideal route is Ainslie St. Terminal - Hespeler Road - Hwy 401 - Brock Road/Aberfoyle - U of G - Downtown Guelph. A second route could go U of G - Hespeler Village - Sportsworld - Conestoga College.
I fully support rail trails, but not when it could come at the cost of a transit corridor. It's always easier to convert a corridor for bicycle/pedestrian use, as opposed to doing that in reverse. ... There is significant people travel between Cambridge and Guelph, and the Fergus spur currently provides a direct connection between Guelph Central Station and the former Cambridge CPR station (which may be a GO station in the future). I would not entertain the idea of a rail trail here if we could use it for transit.




