AlvinofDiaspar
Moderator
Preliminary Report from the April TEYCC:
http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-77949.pdf
AoD
http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-77949.pdf
AoD
all it means is that some building face fronts directly on the property line. If you look at the renders you can see that there is some small sidwalk widening along Church.. the building just overhangs it above.high-reflectivity glazing could be interesting... the DRP is totally going to ask for a redesign though. This isn't plain enough.
In reviewing the application I noticed the following:
Proposed Base Setback at Grade:
Dundas Street East 1.5 m
Dalhousie Street 0.0 m
South Property Line 0.0 m
Church Street 0.0 m
I wonder if this mirrors the setback at 137 Dundas St east, which I find great... no setback on Church st is kinda' crappy though. Also, I hope they don't actually plan on planting trees on the sidewalk that's already narrow.
*edit: I meant redesign.
I kind of hate this building. Completely out of scale for its location (I think 20-30 storeys is more suitable) (Yes I'm aware of what's been approved east of it). The design is ... meh. I guess rectangle with weird balconies is what is going to pass for creativity these days.
I kind of hate this building. Completely out of scale for its location (I think 20-30 storeys is more suitable) (Yes I'm aware of what's been approved east of it). The design is ... meh. I guess rectangle with weird balconies is what is going to pass for creativity these days.
These are the best balconies since One Bloor East.
They ondulate and wave like 1BE. But their sharpness resonates an overwhelming feeling, in a good way. The balconies evoke an emotional response. I think they reflect the evolution of the gritty nature of the neighbourhood.