gristle
Senior Member
People are waking up.
People are awake, that's not the issue. It's when people purport to know something, but offer nothing in terms of evidence. In the case of your 9/11 conspiracy beliefs, that would be you.
People here who still think 9/11 was not an inside job argue like politicians with an agenda. they generalize, manipulate, contradict, attack while avoiding simple questions asked.. It's amazing because whenever I go into detail about something they immediately shoot me down with a generalized point while avoiding what I was talking about. They will say that what I say isn't logical.. yet they can't go into detail about why it isn't logical even after I ask many times. Instead they keep avoiding and attacking with generalized arguments. And watch.. they'll do the same to me here.
Again, you're wrong. People are skeptical about what you assert to be true because you can't provide a shred of evidence to back up your claims. It's really quite simple, but you don't get it. If anything, going by your baseless accusations, you are the one with an agenda. And just so you are clear, demanding your evidence isn't generalizing; it is a very specific request for you to show the proof that is necessary to support your claims. You fail to do this over and over.
I just noticed this was said... wow. Remember awhile ago in this thread when you said something similar and told me to define what the subconscious mind is so I did? Remember the many times I explained what open-mindedness and also explained in great detail how it works including the barriers your mind can create that prevent you from going somewhere your mind doesn't want to go? you know nothing about the mind and I can tell by the way you argue and the way you talk here. You could be the most narrow-minded person and It doesn't matter how many years you've spent in school, how knowledgeable you are or how high your IQ is. I've given you many chances to prove me wrong and you just can't. And that includes just being able to discuss something in detail Instead of generalizing and dodging things etc.
As noted, you have explained nothing and have offered no evidence to examine or refute. Also as previously noted, if you actually bothered to show evidence to back up your assertions (which you have failed to do yet again), people might be more receptive to what you are saying. But as you have no evidence whatsoever to back up any of your claims regarding some massive government conspiracy, one can only conclude that you have an inescapably closed mind because you refuse to acknowledge that obvious fact. You are operating entirely on the basis of your own belief that has no substantiation and are too afraid to admit it, so spare me the drivel on how you are some sort of an expert on open-mindedness. Quit obfuscating and show your evidence already. Trust me, you don't come off as an expert on the mind either. How about you define "mind" for me mr. expert. For once, try show me what you know rather than trying to hide from the fact that you don't know anything.
Hey I'll discuss anything in depth, but fuck the generalizations and all that Bullshit.
Actually, you discuss nothing in depth. You appear to have a chip on your shoulder, are defensive, are a poor writer and have a temper when challenged to prove any of your claims. If you don't like generalizations Kamuix, start dealing in specifics - like in the specific verifiable evidence that supports your claims of a government conspiracy regarding the events of 9/11. No generalizations necessary, just the in-depth detailed specifics. Go ahead, start producing it already.