Four development applications were rejected by Toronto City Council during its July, 2025 meeting, with proposals in Downtown and North York refused due to issues ranging from excessive height and density to inadequate heritage conservation. The decisions impact projects proposing nearly 2,300 residential units, as well as over 140 hotel suites, across buildings ranging from 17 to 64 storeys. In most cases, Council directed City staff to oppose any appeals at the Ontario Land Tribunal (OLT), citing non-conformity with local planning frameworks and design guidelines. 

Here's a closer look at what was rejected:

Downtown Toronto

699 Yonge Street
City Council refused a Zoning By-law Amendment application for 699–707 Yonge Street, 1–17 Hayden Street, and 8 Charles Street East, where Concord Adex proposed a 64-storey, 216.54m condominium tower designed by DIALOG. The project would have introduced 514 residential units on a 1,555m² site at the southeast corner of Yonge and Hayden. 

Planning staff recommended refusal on the basis that the proposed tower did not meet the City's Tall Building Design Guidelines, with unacceptable massing and inadequate tower setbacks. The application also failed to conserve the cultural heritage value of onsite and adjacent heritage properties, conflicting with the Downtown Plan and Site and Area Specific Policy 517. Council authorized staff to oppose any appeal of the decision at the Ontario Land Tribunal.

699 Yonge Street, designed by DIALOG for Concord Adex

445 Adelaide West Hotel
City Council refused a heritage demolition application necessary for a proposed 17-storey hotel at 445–451 Adelaide Street West, a development by Lamb Development Corp designed by architects—Alliance. The application sought to demolish four individually and district-designated heritage properties (namely the 1880 John P. Jackson House and the 1904 Eliza Lennox row houses) within the King-Spadina Heritage Conservation District. 

Staff concluded that the proposal would cause permanent and irreversible loss of cultural heritage resources that contribute to the district’s residential typology, including a unified parapet design and intact 19th- and early 20th-century built forms. The project was found to conflict with the King-Spadina HCD Plan, the Downtown Plan, the King-Spadina Secondary Plan, and the 2024 Provincial Planning Statement, and did not meet the Standards and Guidelines for the Conservation of Historic Places in Canada. Council directed City staff to defend the refusal at the Ontario Land Tribunal if appealed.

445 Adelaide West Hotel, designed by architects—Alliance for Lamb Development Corp

North York

110 Sheppard Avenue East
City Council refused applications for Official Plan and Zoning By-law amendments at 110 Sheppard Avenue East, where Streamliner Properties proposed a 49- and 53-storey condominium development designed by Sweeny &Co Architects. The project included 1,313 residential units, a 5- to 7-storey podium, and 351m² of ground-floor retail, with an overall Floor Space Index (FSI) of 16.88 times coverage of a 4,631m² lot. 

Planning staff advised that the proposal significantly exceeded the height and density limits set out in the North York Centre Secondary Plan, which envisions a more moderate built form on this portion of Sheppard Avenue East. The development was also found to be inconsistent with the 2024 Provincial Planning Statement due to inadequate integration with planned infrastructure. Council authorized staff to appear in opposition should the decision be appealed to the Ontario Land Tribunal.

110 Sheppard Avenue East, designed by Sweeny &Co Architects for Streamliner Properties

30-36 Hendon Avenue
City Council refused Official Plan and Zoning By-law amendment applications for 30–36 Hendon Avenue, where Trolleybus Urban Development proposed a 46-storey (152.55m) purpose-built rental tower designed by Studio JCI. The project sought to deliver 443 rental units on a compact 1,224m² site with a Gross Floor Area of 30,696m² and FSI of 25.1 times lot coverage, exceeding the density typically permitted for this North York Centre Secondary Plan area. 

Planning staff concluded that the proposal represented overdevelopment, with insufficient site area to support the scale and massing of the building. The application also failed to demonstrate adequate soil volume for tree planting, proposed a vehicular access layout that would conflict with pedestrian and operational safety, and did not confirm whether local infrastructure could support the servicing demands of the tower. Council directed staff to pursue mediation if the decision is appealed to the Ontario Land Tribunal.

30–36 Hendon Avenue, designed by Studio JCI for Trolleybus Urban Development Inc

UrbanToronto will continue to follow progress on these developments, but in the meantime, you can learn more about it from our Database file, linked below. If you'd like, you can join in on the conversation in the associated Project Forum thread or leave a comment in the space provided on this page.

* * *

UrbanToronto has a research service, UTPro, that provides comprehensive data on development projects in the Greater Golden Horseshoe — from proposal through to completion. We also offer Instant Reports, downloadable snapshots based on location, and a daily subscription newsletter, New Development Insider, that tracks projects from initial application.​​​

Related Companies:  Aercoustics Engineering Ltd, Arcadis, architects—Alliance, Bousfields, Counterpoint Engineering, Crozier Consulting Engineers, ERA Architects, Ferris + Associates Inc., Gradient Wind Engineers & Scientists, Jablonsky, Ast and Partners, JORG - Renderings & Interactive, LEA Consulting, Quasar Consulting Group, RWDI Climate and Performance Engineering, Sweeny &Co Architects Inc., WND Associates Ltd