News   Apr 17, 2024
 353     0 
News   Apr 17, 2024
 287     0 
News   Apr 17, 2024
 1.8K     1 

US approves 1st stem cell study for spinal injury (physorg.com)

Prometheus The Supremo

►Member №41+⅜◄
Member Bio
Joined
Apr 23, 2007
Messages
4,107
Reaction score
5
Location
a strange reality, bizarro toronto
US approves 1st stem cell study for spinal injury
January 23rd, 2009 in Medicine & Health / Research



(AP) -- A U.S. biotech company says it plans to start this summer the world's first study of a treatment based on human embryonic stem cells - a long-awaited project aimed at spinal cord injury.

The company gained federal permission this week to inject eight to 10 patients with cells derived from embryonic cells, said Dr. Thomas Okarma, president and CEO of Geron Corp. of Menlo Park, Calif.

The patients will be paraplegics, who can use their arms but can't walk. They will receive a single injection within two weeks of their injury.

The study is aimed at testing the safety of the procedure, but doctors will also look for signs of improvement like return of sensation or movement in the legs, Okarma said.

Whatever its outcome, the study will mark a new chapter in the contentious history of embryonic stem cell research in the United States - a field where debate spilled out of the laboratory long ago and into national politics.

While some overseas doctors claim to use human embryonic stem cells in their clinics, stem cell experts said they knew of no previous human studies that use such cells.

"It's a milestone and it's a breakthrough for the field" because Geron passed the safety hurdles for getting federal clearance to launch the study, said Ed Baetge, chief scientific officer of Novocell Inc. His company hopes to begin a similar human study for treating diabetes in a few years.

In addition, said spinal cord injury researcher Dr. Wise Young of Rutgers University, "a lot of hope of the spinal cord injury community is riding on this trial."

Embryonic stem cells can develop into any cell of the body, and scientists have long hoped to harness them for creating replacement tissues to treat a variety of diseases. But research has been controversial because embryos must be destroyed to obtain them.

President Barack Obama has promised to relax the Bush administration's restrictions on federal financing for such research. But Obama's ascent to the White House had nothing to do with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration's granting permission for the new study, Okarma said in a telephone interview Thursday.

In fact, the company says, the project involves stem cells that were eligible for federal funding under Bush, although no federal money was used to develop the experimental treatment or to pay for the human study.

Other human cells, called adult stem cells, have been tested before in people to treat heart problems, for example.

In the Geron study, the injections will be made in the spine at the site of damage. The work will be done in four to seven medical centers around the country, Okarma said.

Animal studies suggest that once injected, the cells will mature and repair what is essentially a lack of insulation around damaged nerves, and also pump out substances that nerves need to function and grow.

Apart from assessing safety, investigators will hope to see some signs of improvement in the patient, Okarma said. The idea is "not to make somebody ... get up and dance the next day," he said, but rather to provide some level of ability that can be improved by physical therapy.

Each patient will receive a low dose of anti-rejection drugs for about two months, because after that time the medications shouldn't be needed, Okarma said. The study will follow each patient for at least a year.

Okarma said he can't estimate how much such a therapy would cost if it proves effective, but that "this is not going to be a $500,000 price tag. It will be remarkably affordable ... in the context of the value it provides."

Evan Snyder, a stem cell researcher at the Burnham Institute for Medical Research in La Jolla, Calif., said scientists in the field will focus chiefly on the study's results about safety.

"The one hope that everybody has is that nothing bad happens," he said.

Geron Corp. has spent at least $100 million on human embryonic stem cell research. Founded in 1992, it does not have any therapies on the market.

However, the company is considered the world's leading embryonic stem cell developer thanks to its claims on several key stem cell technologies. Geron helped finance researchers at the University of Wisconsin who first isolated human embryonic stem cells in 1998. The company has retained exclusive rights on several of those cell types.

http://www.physorg.com/news151915469.html


they are gonna try this on newbies (freshly paralyzed people). i hope they take into consideration that some people who have spinal cord injuries and are left with paralysis usually have some level of neurological recovery, usually within the first year since injury onset & sometimes up to a few years later. the less severe the injury, the greater hope of recovery. i hope they take into account recovery that could have happened on its own. IMO, if they wanna be certain any recovery is by the treatment and not on its own, the best way to test it out is on severe cases of spinal injuries such as stretched cord or crushed cord. obviously one of the reasons they don't try this treatment on older injuries is because of the scar tissue that builds up over time which inhibits nerve growth. hopefully they can find some enzyme or something that will eat the scar tissue so they can try the geron treatment on older injury cases. and this is all in relation to the central nervous system. then there are the issues of the peripheral nervous system (the nerves that connect from the spinal cord to things such as muscles) to deal with which is a whole other issue. man is the human body a mess of stuff.


nevertheless, the Geron trials are a step forward in a repressed field of study. hESC research is a must in the quest for a cure.
 
IMO, if they wanna be certain any recovery is by the treatment and not on its own, the best way to test it out is on severe cases of spinal injuries such as stretched cord or crushed cord.

They would have to use a control group of subjects with similar injuries, have them not receive the new treatment, and see if the test group and control group differ with respect to recovery over time.
 
They would have to use a control group of subjects with similar injuries, have them not receive the new treatment, and see if the test group and control group differ with respect to recovery over time.

the problem is getting similar injuries. sometimes people have the same injuries and are effected in different ways. i think it's gonna be very hard to conduct accurate tests. they're gonna have to test it on people who have no hope at all for any kind of recovery but even then, i've met people who have been told they had no hope in hell for even a minimal recovery and they recovered way more than minimal. of course, these were probably cases of misdiagnosis.

there are soo many variables. it don't know if it will be possible to factor them all in. the type of recovery goals they are talking about can happen on their own. of course, i have more faith in these american trials VS. some overseas clinics that charge serious $$$ (and refuse to explain their process) that are more likely just ripping people off & injecting who knows what into their spinal cords.
 
If you want to understand why the 14 day time period was chosen, this might help.
 
I am just glad that dumbass Bush is gone so the US can get back to scientific frontiers.
 
I am just glad that dumbass Bush is gone so the US can get back to scientific frontiers.

me too. there's alot of catching up to do.
 

Back
Top