News   Dec 09, 2019
 490     4 
News   Dec 09, 2019
 440     0 
News   Dec 09, 2019
 552     0 

TTC: Scarborough Subway Extension (formerly LRT replacement) (City of Toronto, Design Phase)

sixrings

Senior Member
Member Bio
Joined
Aug 19, 2009
Messages
4,254
Reaction score
1,333
I provided a plain technical reason why the Brimley station is good for connectivity. Riders who board the LRT east of Brimley, for example at Eglinton & Markham Rd or the Eglinton GO station, and wish to go to STC, will be able to transfer at the Brimley station. If there is no station at Brimley, then the said riders will have to go all the way to Kennedy, and then backtrack.

You are the one who's trying to spin the conversation with the "they deserve" and "feel like they are urban" type of nonsense.



You are confident that nothing will be built. And yet, you feel the urge to come to this thread and state your objection to the Brimley station. How interesting ..
I try to come here less often to keep my sanity. Good day.
 

syn

Senior Member
Member Bio
Joined
Apr 26, 2007
Messages
4,271
Reaction score
1,736
It's perfectly rational to believe the Eglinton East LRT won't be built because it's not a part of Ford's transit plans and it was completely unfunded even when it was on the radar.

I can see why the city would request a station on Eglinton and Brimley given this reality.

Do people seriously think Ford wants to spend billions on the SSE, billions more on a Sheppard extension then build an above ground LRT extension, all in Scarborough?

Is that a 'rational' belief given everything that's happened (or not happened)??
 
Last edited:

TheTigerMaster

Superstar
Member Bio
Joined
Feb 3, 2012
Messages
12,424
Reaction score
4,430
Location
Best Toronto
I’m like 70% sure the DRL isn’t happening, 75% sure the SSE isn’t happening and 100% sure the EELRT isn’t happening. What in the world would give anyone the impression that the EELRT has even the most remote possibility of getting built?
 
Last edited:

OneCity

Senior Member
Member Bio
Joined
Dec 28, 2016
Messages
1,710
Reaction score
613
I’m like 70% sure the DRL isn’t happening, 75% sure the SSE isn’t happening and 100% sure the EELRT isn’t happening. What in the world would give anyone the chance that the EELRT has even the most remote possibility of getting built?
Last I heard EELRT is still in design, supported locally and in the City. Simply put Its not on the same priority level compared tot the SSE or OL. The City will also have ample opportunity to negotiate the EELRT in with this Province or the next admin as it will be ready and Crosstown will be finishing up. Very far from being 100% dead. I think it adds great value but its not near the same level of politically or commuter need at the moment. Politically I fully expect the City to keep the pressure on for this line during 'talks' with the Province as well as following elections and really don't expect it to disappear as lines that are actually supported locally don't fade away easily.

The Cons are likely going to milk these subway lines for max profit but no elected admin is going to overturn them as they gain traction based on support, and need. If they are adding in the Brimley stop to the SSE they can milk it for as long as they need for all I care. Nice to see were finally going forward with what should have been design ready decades ago.
 
Last edited:

robmausser

Senior Member
Member Bio
Joined
Dec 16, 2013
Messages
2,382
Reaction score
2,374
Given that the EELRT is a City of Toronto project, separate from Metrolinx's Crosstown:
  1. How many LRT vehicles are forecasted as required to provide service?
  2. Was the intention, at any point, to tack on to Metrolinx's car orders from either Bombardier or from Alstom? Or was the City going to start an entirely new procurement process?
  3. Where would the carhouse be located?
While the funding is separate from the Crosstown, the project will be an extension of the existing LRT, not a separate service.

I believe the carhouse for the crosstown can currently handle more cars, but it would also be made bigger in the case that it wasnt.

No idea on the vehicle orders, I dont think the project is that far along yet
 

JSF-1

Active Member
Member Bio
Joined
Feb 27, 2018
Messages
375
Reaction score
536
Location
Woburn
Where would the carhouse be located?
Sheppard and Collins Road most likely as this was going to be the yard location back during the Transit City era. Back then the yard would have served both the Sheppard East LRT and Scarborough-Malvern LRT however it doesn't need to do that at the moment, so the yard would have a lot of expansion space if needed.

EELRTYard.png
 

Rainforest

Senior Member
Member Bio
Joined
Mar 23, 2008
Messages
3,953
Reaction score
1,281
I disagree with those who fear that adding the Brimley subway station will undermine EE LRT; for the following reasons:

- Ford will not fund EE LRT, no matter what. His announced plan is pretty bold / costly, and likely won't be 100% complete. EE LRT isn't even a part of that plan. No reason to expect Ford will suddenly change his mind and decide to add EE LRT to the package.

- If the next government, likely after 2026, has interest in EE LRT and wants to fund it, they will not turn it down just because of a single subway station at Brimley.

Therefore: Yes to the Brimley station if the province is willing to fund it.
 

Rainforest

Senior Member
Member Bio
Joined
Mar 23, 2008
Messages
3,953
Reaction score
1,281
^ I hope everyone realizes that the presenter doesn't really understand the topic.

His proposal is, basically, "let's replace the subway extension with making one existing line look nicer". No mention of other light rail lines. The suggestion to extend the S(L)RT north to Sheppard is not wrong, but is trivial, everyone knows that it would hit Sheppard at Progress. The suggestion to extend the line south from Kennedy towards the Beaches is outlandish; there is no demand and there is no surface corridor to use.

If I wanted to advocate for either an LRT or a "Skytrain" alternative for the subway, I could do a better job.
 

Leo_Chan

Senior Member
Member Bio
Joined
Nov 13, 2016
Messages
3,153
Reaction score
1,866
Location
Richmond Hill
^ I hope everyone realizes that the presenter doesn't really understand the topic.

His proposal is, basically, "let's replace the subway extension with making one existing line look nicer". No mention of other light rail lines. The suggestion to extend the S(L)RT north to Sheppard is not wrong, but is trivial, everyone knows that it would hit Sheppard at Progress. The suggestion to extend the line south from Kennedy towards the Beaches is outlandish; there is no demand and there is no surface corridor to use.

If I wanted to advocate for either an LRT or a "Skytrain" alternative for the subway, I could do a better job.
You better make a video response to @Reecemartin then. Words in a forum post do not do enough to convey your points.
 

OneCity

Senior Member
Member Bio
Joined
Dec 28, 2016
Messages
1,710
Reaction score
613
^ I hope everyone realizes that the presenter doesn't really understand the topic.

His proposal is, basically, "let's replace the subway extension with making one existing line look nicer". No mention of other light rail lines. The suggestion to extend the S(L)RT north to Sheppard is not wrong, but is trivial, everyone knows that it would hit Sheppard at Progress. The suggestion to extend the line south from Kennedy towards the Beaches is outlandish; there is no demand and there is no surface corridor to use.

If I wanted to advocate for either an LRT or a "Skytrain" alternative for the subway, I could do a better job.
A better LRT line was already recommended by Metrolinx and was the plan supported by the Mayor in a "weak" Mayoral municipal system. Council stopped it and then council then agreed to the Liberals change to the McCowan subway only to have collectively chaotic City council one up themselves again by stripping out all the stops with the help of a politicized City planner.

One thing we don't have is a "weak" Provincial government system so the 3 (maybe 4)stop subway will continue to move forward as the plan no matter how many new pre-Centre transfer, napkin plans are still being drawn up by those who always refuse to take a hint that we needed to do better with Central connectivity at a minimum.
 
Last edited:

44 North

Senior Member
Member Bio
Joined
Feb 8, 2010
Messages
3,228
Reaction score
1,516
Location
Ward 28
You better make a video response to @Reecemartin then. Words in a forum post do not do enough to convey your points.
As a constructive criticism I think the video could've done with more graphics. Also laid out the ridership differences. SSE, at least when it was looked at +10yrs ago, does have higher ridership. Albeit marginally. Its benefit is that it removes the transfer (not the capacity as RM pointed out), which results in the bump up of ridership. All the other benefits are weighted toward upgraded Line 3. More development potential, more connectivity, more coverage, more length, and that it is a subway. Things I feel weren't touched on enough to sell the point. Things that graphics and charts could help do.
 

BurlOak

Senior Member
Member Bio
Joined
Dec 7, 2011
Messages
5,828
Reaction score
1,513
^ I hope everyone realizes that the presenter doesn't really understand the topic.

His proposal is, basically, "let's replace the subway extension with making one existing line look nicer". No mention of other light rail lines. The suggestion to extend the S(L)RT north to Sheppard is not wrong, but is trivial, everyone knows that it would hit Sheppard at Progress. The suggestion to extend the line south from Kennedy towards the Beaches is outlandish; there is no demand and there is no surface corridor to use.

If I wanted to advocate for either an LRT or a "Skytrain" alternative for the subway, I could do a better job.
extending the line south, is just a variant of the connect it to Eglinton idea. Reece seems to realize that a longer line is needed, and could be had with the budget. I suggested it needed extending all the way to downtown. Although that needed some more money kicked in. I looked at a route via the beaches, but elevation did indeed seem hard. I opted for the hydro corridor to Don Valley routing, with underground only needed right in the downtown.
as for North extension, I'm not sure if one branch could go up Kennedy to Steeles, this branch split at Sheppard to go East to Malvern. The other bra much goes through STC to centennial, whench one branch goes to Malvern to connect with the previous bracb, while the final branch goes to UTSC
Angways, the time for this was maybe 6 or 7 years ago.
 

Rainforest

Senior Member
Member Bio
Joined
Mar 23, 2008
Messages
3,953
Reaction score
1,281
You better make a video response to @Reecemartin then. Words in a forum post do not do enough to convey your points.
@Reecemartin : sorry I didn't realize one of the forumers made that video. I know that you know the topic. Perhaps you decided to skip some aspects as not significant enough. I respect your opinion, even though mine is somewhat different.
 

Top