Automation Gallery
Superstar
I would guess this will be starting soon?
Toronto Concord Sky | 299m | 85s | Concord Adex | a—A
- Thread starter greenleaf
- Start date
flavakid32
New Member
An thinking this is going to be a 10 year project minimum 7.5, they will dig for gold about 2 years.
ushahid
Senior Member
is it going to start construction in spring or fall of this year?
Automation Gallery
Superstar
Guaranteed with Cresford/Kohn we will have this building beaming in our skyline in 5 years
Strange Advance
Active Member
Member Bio
- Joined
- Nov 16, 2008
- Messages
- 602
- Reaction score
- 535
- Location
- Home of the Brave, Worlds Away
You misspelled befouling.Guaranteed with Cresford/Kohn we will have this building beaming in our skyline in 5 years
TizianoTitian
New Member
Thank you for the information, Do you know how branding with fashion designer works? I am interested in exploring branding with a fashion designer for a condo.
Automation Gallery
Superstar
Gee, one of the reasons most developments take years and years to get city approvals and shovels on the ground
Years after the city gets an application for a development they decide to designate the site + certain buildings. which starts another long process for developers
Example addresses on the Toronto and East York Community Council agenda for Feb/14-2019
TE3.10(10:30 AM) Alterations to Heritage Properties, Intention to Designate under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act and Authority to Enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement
- 15 Duncan Street and 158 Pearl Street (Ward 10) TE3.11(10:30 AM)
- 49 Spadina Avenue (Ward 10) TE3.12(10:30 AM)
33 Avenue Road - York Square (Ward 11) TE3.13(10:30 AM)
- 363-365 Yonge Street, 367 Yonge Street, 381 Yonge Street and 385-391 Yonge Street (Ward 13) TE3.14(10:30 AM)
- 226 St. George Street (Ward 13) TE3.15(10:30 AM)
64 Wellesley Street East under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act (Ward 13) TE3.16(10:30 AM) I
- 721 Eastern Avenue (Ward 14) TE3.16(10:30 AM)
http://app.toronto.ca/tmmis/decisio...on=doPrepare&meetingId=15390#Meeting-2019.TE3
Years after the city gets an application for a development they decide to designate the site + certain buildings. which starts another long process for developers
Example addresses on the Toronto and East York Community Council agenda for Feb/14-2019
TE3.10(10:30 AM) Alterations to Heritage Properties, Intention to Designate under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act and Authority to Enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement
- 15 Duncan Street and 158 Pearl Street (Ward 10) TE3.11(10:30 AM)
- 49 Spadina Avenue (Ward 10) TE3.12(10:30 AM)
33 Avenue Road - York Square (Ward 11) TE3.13(10:30 AM)
- 363-365 Yonge Street, 367 Yonge Street, 381 Yonge Street and 385-391 Yonge Street (Ward 13) TE3.14(10:30 AM)
- 226 St. George Street (Ward 13) TE3.15(10:30 AM)
64 Wellesley Street East under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act (Ward 13) TE3.16(10:30 AM) I
- 721 Eastern Avenue (Ward 14) TE3.16(10:30 AM)
http://app.toronto.ca/tmmis/decisio...on=doPrepare&meetingId=15390#Meeting-2019.TE3
ushahid
Senior Member
were Cresford planning on demolishing one of those building? it would suck.
Kitsune
Senior Member
I dont see the doom and gloom ... it states:
[qupte]
Recommendations
The Senior Manager, Urban Design/Heritage, City Planning Division recommends that:
1. City Council approve the alterations to the heritage properties at 363-365 Yonge Street, 367 Yonge Street, 381 Yonge Street and 385-391 Yonge Street in accordance with Section 33 of the Ontario Heritage Act, to allow for the construction of a 85-storey tower on the lands known municipally as 363 Yonge Street, with such alterations substantially in accordance with plans and drawings dated November 18, 2018, prepared by KPF Architects, and on file with the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services; and the Heritage Impact Assessment, prepared by ERA Architects Inc., June 14, 2018, and on file with the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services, all subject to and in accordance with a Conservation Plan satisfactory to the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services and subject to the following additional conditions:
[/quote]
Nothing more then a rubber stamp for the alterations.
Northern Light
Superstar
You've always been a bit of an apologist for developers...........but this post takes the cake.
Oh woes to many to count..........save something historical you just shouldn't be touching in the first place.............accommodate cyclists.........be vaguely eco-friendly.........etc.
All this burden associated with making, if you don't screw it up a return of 12-20% on your investment.
Automation Gallery
Superstar
it sucks more to watch a development being stalled again to find out the designated heritage building eventually gets demolished for a lousy facade
cd concept
Senior Member
Personally I don't really care if it even gets started . It looks cheap compared to the last two renderings . The podium on the first rendering Blends in quite nicely with the old buildings. And I don't even mind the first condo renderings with that odd punctured window look . It kind of Blends in with the new Ryerson building next door to it. And even the second rendering had some class by having a sexy slim angled building that spires into the sky with style ! Looking back YSL and even Chelsea old renderings across the street . Makes you think how nice those projects could have looked.
ushahid
Senior Member
I was really pissed when they changed and chopped the design, it still looks good though. city like NYC would not mind it.
Automation Gallery
Superstar
Come on ushahid that design was not realistic, this is more likely to be built here, forget NYC
ADRM
Senior Member
Regular reminder that NYC has just as many mediocre buildings as Toronto or any other big city with lots of contemporary high-rise construction.