Well, you can feel free to never enjoy that park, or any other parkland contribution. How people don't get the concept of a park being a greater public benefit to the neighbourhood than another tower is just beyond me.
I agree with your general sentiment supporting more green space, but to say Toronto has few parks is nonsense. Toronto has 1,600 parks covering over 20,000 acres. Paris has about a quarter as many, and they cover about a third of the acreage.Toronto has a pittance of parks compared to other great cities like London and Paris. It's disappointing how we've come to accept the current state from government. The downtown core, especially, has an absurdly low acres of parkland/person. The entire site should have been purchased as a park, but it's just not a priority for a city council that is keen to shit on the downtown core's liveability for the benefit of less dense areas.
I agree with your general sentiment supporting more green space, but to say Toronto has few parks is nonsense. Toronto has 1,600 parks covering over 20,000 acres. Paris has about a quarter as many, and they cover about a third of the acreage.
The City has to have the money to both buy the land and to then build a park on it. It doesn't have enough to do that, especially where the land is zoned for development, or could reasonably be up-zoned for development. Those lots cost a fortune, which the City does not have.For a city that talks about the pressing need for more green space why do we still end up with proposals like Wellesley on the Park? I like the design but this lot should have been green space. All of it. Then there's that huge parking lot bordering Queen East. It's one of the last empty lots left and not one stitch of it will be green space. What's going wrong and what needs to change so it doesn't happen again?
That's why the City is pushing for Rail Deck Park: it's the last spot where substantial new park space can be created in the centre of the city.We're going to be in big trouble when the downtown population doubles and we'll have no one to blame but ourselves. We have opportunities but not taking advantage of any of them.
You're not going to get any of those pipe dreams. The Community Centre is set to go in on the west end of the park. We have no idea what will happen to the Armoury. The affordable housing to the east is not being torn down.I worry that the next big opportunity lost will be Moss Park. Instead of relocating the military building and recreation centre beyond the lot I bet we'll end up as many buildings as we have now OR maybe even more. The rectangle bounded by Jarvis, Queen East, Sherbourne, and Shuter should be all green space. EVERY LAST SQUARE INCH OF IT. That block directly to the east with those nasty Community Housing blocks need to come down and that lot turned into 100% park as well. ALL OF IT. Build a new community housing tower BORDERING IT. But I suppose we'll just rebuild new towers right on that lot.
It's just a very expensive concept at this point. There are legal issues to be solved, and a huge money-crunch issue to be overcome. Ultimately we either find the money or it doesn't happen.Then there's Rail Deck park. Will Toronto mess that up too?