Union Centre | 298m | 54s | Westbank | Bjarke Ingels Group

thecharioteer

Senior Member
Member Bio
Joined
Jun 17, 2009
Messages
3,480
Reaction score
2,280
Well, I guess these would never have been approved by the DRP (if there had been one back then):

48710247-6183-4A02-9E16-B3C7D0693E0E.jpeg
 

officedweller

Senior Member
Member Bio
Joined
Apr 24, 2007
Messages
2,766
Reaction score
1,009

This design would have been quite complementary to 160 Front.

I'm not sure they will be able to do this and still elevator the tower properly.

Couldn't they just double bank the lowest and second lowest set of office elevators?
That would still preserve floor space on the upper levels.

I also doubt the lights will be the actual elevators.
Say they have 5 banks of 4 elevators each serving 10 floors
(other than podium, or maybe they all stop at the podium levels)
For example, that means the banks will light up as follows:
1-5 (podium), 6-15 (lit to 15), 16-25 (lit to 25), 26-35 (lit to 35), 36-45 (lit to 45), 46-52 (lit to 52)
Only the tallest bank of elevators (one section) will reach the top of the building.
The others would only light up to their highest floor.
You would never have all elevators travel to the top of the building.
The rendering hides the side of the building where the lights stop lower down.
 
Last edited:

spaced

Active Member
Member Bio
Joined
May 7, 2007
Messages
578
Reaction score
45
This doesn't seem too much wider than CIBC square. Eye test only though, I couldn't find any measurements regarding the width of these 2 buildings. I'm curious what the DRP would say about CIBC's width not being an issue compared to this being a deal breaker here.
 

interchange42

Administrator
Staff member
Member Bio
Joined
Apr 23, 2007
Messages
25,045
Reaction score
25,956
Location
by the Humber
This design would have been quite complementary to 160 Front.



Couldn't they just double bank the lowest and second lowest set of office elevators?
That would still preserve floor space on the upper levels.

I also doubt the lights will be the actual elevators.
Say they have 5 banks of 4 elevators each serving 10 floors
(other than podium, or maybe they all stop at the podium levels)
For example, that means the banks will light up as follows:
1-5 (podium), 6-15 (lit to 15), 16-25 (lit to 25), 26-35 (lit to 35), 36-45 (lit to 45), 46-52 (lit to 52)
Only the tallest bank of elevators (one section) will reach the top of the building.
The others would only light up to their highest floor.
You would never have all elevators travel to the top of the building.
The rendering hides the side of the building where the lights stop lower down.
Hmm? This rendering, in the database file and published in a number of our stories, clearly shows the elevator banks, and does indicate that we will see the lights of the elevators:

UnionCtrHeroS1280.jpg


42
 

Contra

Senior Member
Member Bio
Joined
Jan 4, 2012
Messages
1,597
Reaction score
4,027
Location
San Francisco
Structurally it will be super interesting to watch if this goes up as is. Multiple "external" elevators and a strong steel lattice work. Reminds me a bit, structurally, of the Cheesegrater in London.
 

UrbanOzz

New Member
Member Bio
Joined
Jun 3, 2019
Messages
72
Reaction score
92
Location
Swansea, Toronto
I love the looks of the lights in the renders, the only issue is it's really flawed. it's an office tower. those elevators will be moving from 8-6 and then be largely still (during the hours where you can see the lights the most)
 

Contra

Senior Member
Member Bio
Joined
Jan 4, 2012
Messages
1,597
Reaction score
4,027
Location
San Francisco
I love the looks of the lights in the renders, the only issue is it's really flawed. it's an office tower. those elevators will be moving from 8-6 and then be largely still (during the hours where you can see the lights the most)
I suppose that's the one benefit of it getting dark at nearly 3 in the winter!
 

AlvinofDiaspar

Moderator
Member Bio
Joined
Apr 22, 2007
Messages
30,827
Reaction score
22,808
Location
Toronto
I love the looks of the lights in the renders, the only issue is it's really flawed. it's an office tower. those elevators will be moving from 8-6 and then be largely still (during the hours where you can see the lights the most)

Wouldn't take much to program the elevators to move after office hours and call it the public art contribution :p

AoD
 

Northern Light

Superstar
Member Bio
Joined
May 20, 2007
Messages
15,699
Reaction score
32,180
Location
Toronto/EY
I love the looks of the lights in the renders, the only issue is it's really flawed. it's an office tower. those elevators will be moving from 8-6 and then be largely still (during the hours where you can see the lights the most)

In fairness, what seems like a lifetime ago as I was graduating uni; my filler job for a few weeks til I landed something I was looking for, was security in one of those downtown towers.

You'd be surprised how busy they are in the evenings.

Typically the elevators were programed to go to access card only at 7pm; but aside from routine stragglers, I have to tell you we had a tech group in our building and they didn't even get everyone in til late afternoon and would regularly go to 3am; and there's the dozens of office cleaners who hop floor to floor from around 8pm to 1am most night.

Certainly not as busy as daytime, but far from quiet; that was only a 30-storey tower, not a huge one like this where there would doubtless be even more activity later at night.

****

Now weekends...........weekends could be dead......
 

officedweller

Senior Member
Member Bio
Joined
Apr 24, 2007
Messages
2,766
Reaction score
1,009
Hmm? This rendering, in the database file and published in a number of our stories, clearly shows the elevator banks, and does indicate that we will see the lights of the elevators:

42

What I meant was that the right most bank of elevator would only light to the level below the trees, and so forth.
The nighttime rendering hides that with other buildings (instead of using a different angle),
so you'd still have a wide building on the upper right without the "art piece" mitigating the width.

 

SonyPayStation

Active Member
Member Bio
Joined
Jun 26, 2019
Messages
126
Reaction score
142
This is not a simple tower. There’s actually quite a lot going on. The slab is broken up into 10 smaller units. Structural diagrid will be visible. The lit elevators on the north façade. But it’ll be elegant and timeless - unlike the kitsch of the Pelli/Oxford design nearby.

Why is the slab 10 units? Any idea?
 

ptbotrmpfn

Senior Member
Member Bio
Joined
Jan 29, 2011
Messages
1,340
Reaction score
382
Whee are these elevators... I see fancy way of lighting the building to make it look interesting for a render. Nothing that clearly indicates elevator shafts. If so then why are there five elevators on the east side near the top. The elevator theory makes no sense. That would be cool and all but I don’t see what you are all talking about here.
 

Top