The Capitol | 56.35m | 14s | Madison Group | Turner Fleischer

Urban-Affair

Senior Member
Member Bio
Joined
Nov 18, 2007
Messages
2,321
Reaction score
1,535
Location
Toronto
I could have sworn the Capital was listed as a heritage structure recently. If something is built here, I hope it is midrise at most.
 

A Torontonian Now

Senior Member
Member Bio
Joined
Jan 28, 2014
Messages
1,776
Reaction score
6,756
Location
Bloor & Jane
This has been in the works for a while. I visited there back in 2015 while looking at potential wedding venues. We were told it was under new management as the building had been recently purchased for development, and keeping the event space operation going was only a temporary measure.
 

innsertnamehere

Superstar
Member Bio
Joined
Mar 8, 2010
Messages
17,884
Reaction score
18,463
All properties involved:

10 CASTLEFIELD AVE
20 CASTLEFIELD AVE
565 DUPLEX AVE
567 DUPLEX AVE
2490-2504 YONGE ST
2500 YONGE ST

http://app.toronto.ca/DevelopmentAp...4404109&isCofASearch=false&isTlabSearch=false
pretty large site:

Capture.JPG
 

Attachments

  • Capture.JPG
    Capture.JPG
    252.8 KB · Views: 758

Northern Light

Superstar
Member Bio
Joined
May 20, 2007
Messages
24,084
Reaction score
62,953
Location
Toronto/EY
Looking at this site, we now understand the Green P parking lot to be involved.

A curiosity about this is that the Midtown in Focus planning report I posted recently mused about this site as possible green space and/or affordable housing.

http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2018/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-117721.pdf

http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2018/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-117724.pdf

This also means the City of Toronto is involved via Green P, if only as a seller.

I see @Urban-Affair started a thread on this site a while back.

https://urbantoronto.ca/forum/threads/12-castlefield-madison-properties.21434/

A review of the 2018 budget notes turns up that CP39 (this parking lot) has a line item for redevelopment, but I don't see any detail.
 

Urban-Affair

Senior Member
Member Bio
Joined
Nov 18, 2007
Messages
2,321
Reaction score
1,535
Location
Toronto
The back will most def be townhomes, and I expect lots of setbacks like that development down at Soudan and Duplex.
 

someMidTowner

¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Member Bio
Joined
Sep 2, 2011
Messages
9,333
Reaction score
15,163
Location
(Former) Ward 16
The back will most def be townhomes, and I expect lots of setbacks like that development down at Soudan and Duplex.
I'd assume a Montgomery Square type development with a tower set behind the theatre facade, and townhomes fronting Duplex.
 

Urban-Affair

Senior Member
Member Bio
Joined
Nov 18, 2007
Messages
2,321
Reaction score
1,535
Location
Toronto
I think that would be a very large fight for something with a massing as large as Montgomery. I think it will have to be closer to 10-15 storeys. Guess we will see what happens...
 

someMidTowner

¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Member Bio
Joined
Sep 2, 2011
Messages
9,333
Reaction score
15,163
Location
(Former) Ward 16
I think that would be a very large fight for something with a massing as large as Montgomery. I think it will have to be closer to 10-15 storeys. Guess we will see what happens...
I should have been clearer. Not expecting Monty Square height here at all. Just a similar arrangement of facade/tower/towns
 

interchange42

Administrator
Staff member
Member Bio
Joined
Apr 23, 2007
Messages
26,524
Reaction score
33,038
Location
by the Humber
Thanks for your part in reducing the optional responses to two.

Something that is not a "plain box" is not automatically worthwhile architecture, the same way that something that is a plain box is not automatically bad. Please, let's have more nuanced discussion here.

42
 

Top