Toronto Sugar Wharf Condominiums (Phase 2) | 299m | 90s | Menkes | a—A

Monday March 20
9292A19C-79BC-436E-A2FF-C6D0F29FE3AA.jpeg


A9196E2C-82FC-4754-8F06-71B92340262C.jpeg


D372796F-C0DA-4039-B70A-30E23C6E6BED.jpeg


50B13C3E-E66E-4D4D-ACE3-BAE3F05B0404.jpeg


Wed. March 22
163C0E57-C0C9-4A5E-BC12-D276E08D04FD.jpeg


Fri. March 24
7877E040-F7B4-413C-AD1E-31622F562D4F.jpeg


367F7B14-D090-4BA5-8BAE-7BA68D39BAEA.jpeg
 

Attachments

  • BCD560BA-23B4-41B2-9700-6EF427D6CD00.jpeg
    BCD560BA-23B4-41B2-9700-6EF427D6CD00.jpeg
    350.3 KB · Views: 59
Weren't they supposed to retain the facade of the east and west walls of the southern-most building?
Yeah good catch... guess I couldn't see the forest for demolished bricks. Weird no-one else noticed either. ;)

Here's the east facade (and bit of the north building) as rendered. Maybe they'll keep the west facade (which looks like it's still standing in photos)??

28462-138293.jpeg

UT
 
I feel like I have noticed this on a few other buildings, and it's really frustrating to see. Im guessing there is a reasoning behind it, however I obviously don't know what it would be. And not that this greatly impacts this build, but simply a bad trend (if it even is one)
 
Yeah good catch... guess I couldn't see the forest for demolished bricks. Weird no-one else noticed either. ;)

Here's the east facade (and bit of the north building) as rendered. Maybe they'll keep the west facade (which looks like it's still standing in photos)??

28462-138293.jpeg

UT
The west and part of the north facade on the southern most warehouse building are being kept; the ground prep work has been completed which will allow them to anchor the walls to the ground.

On the northern most warehouse building, the north facade is being kept. I'm not sure if the east facade on that particular building is being kept though.
 

Back
Top