Toronto River City Condos Phase 3 | 99.66m | 29s | Urban Capital | Saucier + Perrotte

First of all, it doesn't look top heavy to me, but…

I don't understand how you can look at a design that is meant to 'break all the rules,' and then seriously declare 'well, it would work better if it followed this rule.' If it did, then it wouldn't be River City 3, it would be Yegger City 3, which breaks all rules except one chosen arbitrarily.

The deal with buildings of this nature is that they are meant to look like they shouldn't be the way they are, and removing the elements that provoke would only water them down. Take away the odd massing here and you remove a major element of what makes River City 3, River City 3.

42

It's fair for me to make a comment about how the look of the building could be improved upon. "Breaking rules" isn't a get out of jail free card, especially when the excuse is that the building is "meant to break all the rules".

Also, you are making a pretty large assumption regarding the building's massing being "meant to provoke". Yes, the protruding sections are interesting but the more likely explanation that the building is boxy and heavy on top (which is what my issue is) is to maximize the floorplate / sellable area.

Let's not get carried away here, this building, while nice, lacks the grace of Telus Sky and the striking engineering of Vancouver House.
 
Sure it's fair for you to comment, and it's fair for someone to respond that you have totally missed the point of the design of River City 3.

The building is not meant to be graceful at all, so of course it lacks the grace of Telus Sky. It does, however, boast striking engineering, even if it doesn't match the degree to which Vancouver House does… but they aren't going for the look of either of those here.

River City 3 is meant to provoke: that's not 'a pretty large assumption,' that's a given: look at it. Of course any developer wants to be able to sell more suites, but if that were the only reason for this building being 'heavy on top,' which it is not particularly, then it would just be a box that gets bigger up top. This building is intentionally avant garde, and yes, it breaks aesthetic rules, and no, making it lighter up top would not objectively make it any better: it does what it's meant to the way it is now (or will be when it's finished).

42
 
You keep talking about the "intent" of River City 3 and about the building "meaning to" do this or do that. I don't care about the intent, I care about the final product, which in my mind could use some refinement. Refinement which by the way would not compromise said claim about its "intent to provoke". I fail to see how you think the top heavy-ness is what makes this building stand out.
 
Telus Sky is beautiful, sure, but it’s not without its own goofy angles.

2CFA47CF-C4A1-43FE-B25A-86EF5C8EBECD.jpeg
 

Attachments

  • 2CFA47CF-C4A1-43FE-B25A-86EF5C8EBECD.jpeg
    2CFA47CF-C4A1-43FE-B25A-86EF5C8EBECD.jpeg
    216.5 KB · Views: 744
Several teams working on those fab drawer treatments...nice to see them shift from the lower sweater and pant drawers into the sock and underwear ones.

RC3_1.jpg


RC3_2.jpg


RC3_3.jpg


Several athletic types were in the gym/s (in the streaked lighting lowest drawers).
RC3_4.jpg


A long slow climb upwards...(those two small orange rollers are the only things keeping this from scratching the glass all the way up!).

RC3_5.jpg


RC3_6.jpg


RC3_7.jpg


RC3_8.jpg


Love the clean articulation between some of these drawers, such as spacing between the white balconies near the centre of this photo...

RC3_9.jpg


The black nook next to the white nook finally complete on south side.

RC3_10.jpg
 

Attachments

  • RC3_1.jpg
    RC3_1.jpg
    183.1 KB · Views: 717
  • RC3_2.jpg
    RC3_2.jpg
    230.7 KB · Views: 743
  • RC3_3.jpg
    RC3_3.jpg
    181 KB · Views: 731
  • RC3_4.jpg
    RC3_4.jpg
    191.4 KB · Views: 760
  • RC3_5.jpg
    RC3_5.jpg
    234.1 KB · Views: 698
  • RC3_6.jpg
    RC3_6.jpg
    280.6 KB · Views: 708
  • RC3_7.jpg
    RC3_7.jpg
    242.9 KB · Views: 706
  • RC3_8.jpg
    RC3_8.jpg
    201.6 KB · Views: 705
  • RC3_9.jpg
    RC3_9.jpg
    175.2 KB · Views: 734
  • RC3_10.jpg
    RC3_10.jpg
    202.2 KB · Views: 702
Last edited:
Paint it black...

RC3-1.jpg


Liking the dark rich black backside. :) (I assume the peeled white strips will reveal all black).

RC3-2.jpg


RC3-3.jpg


Nerves of steel for this crane operator...

RC3-4.jpg


RC3-5.jpg


RC3-6.jpg


This fellow's hardhat has travelled more than my travel-weary luggage.

RC3-7.jpg


Taken a couple of evenings ago...

RC3-8.jpg
 

Attachments

  • RC3-1.jpg
    RC3-1.jpg
    243.9 KB · Views: 717
  • RC3-2.jpg
    RC3-2.jpg
    379 KB · Views: 713
  • RC3-3.jpg
    RC3-3.jpg
    251.8 KB · Views: 707
  • RC3-4.jpg
    RC3-4.jpg
    227.6 KB · Views: 705
  • RC3-5.jpg
    RC3-5.jpg
    266.2 KB · Views: 665
  • RC3-6.jpg
    RC3-6.jpg
    234.1 KB · Views: 705
  • RC3-7.jpg
    RC3-7.jpg
    271.8 KB · Views: 717
  • RC3-8.jpg
    RC3-8.jpg
    289 KB · Views: 708
Last edited:

Back
Top