HousingNowTO
Senior Member
--- END OF DEVELOPER SLIDES ---
Toronto Richview Square | 103.75m | 31s | Trinity Group | B+H
- Thread starter PMT
- Start date
--- END OF DEVELOPER SLIDES ---
Amare
Senior Member
This project is actually just such a mess I dont even know what the plan is trying to accomplish.
The park space is going to be useless along this highway-esque stretch of Eglinton, expanding are surrounding park closeby if possible would've been far more useful. The POPs space is a lazy attempt to tie in the "park" and the two towers together especially with the the stupid looping inner street, and Building C meets Eglinton in an non-inviting way.
This is all just a half-baked lazy plan that doesnt provide useful park space, doesnt provide any kind of decent streetwall along Eglinton, and wastes land with a non-thoughful street loop. But then again this is Trinity Group so they pretty much specialize in half-baked plans which dont make any sense.
Just put the retail in the base of Building B and C, orientate Building B and C in a way where the retail would be useful and front Eglinton and the northern most road, get rid of the POPs space which is useless as proposed (or put it between the re-orientated Building B and C), demolish Building D and put the park space at the rear of the site. Is that so hard?
The park space is going to be useless along this highway-esque stretch of Eglinton, expanding are surrounding park closeby if possible would've been far more useful. The POPs space is a lazy attempt to tie in the "park" and the two towers together especially with the the stupid looping inner street, and Building C meets Eglinton in an non-inviting way.
This is all just a half-baked lazy plan that doesnt provide useful park space, doesnt provide any kind of decent streetwall along Eglinton, and wastes land with a non-thoughful street loop. But then again this is Trinity Group so they pretty much specialize in half-baked plans which dont make any sense.
Just put the retail in the base of Building B and C, orientate Building B and C in a way where the retail would be useful and front Eglinton and the northern most road, get rid of the POPs space which is useless as proposed (or put it between the re-orientated Building B and C), demolish Building D and put the park space at the rear of the site. Is that so hard?
Last edited:
Towered
Senior Member
Why can't they put the park along Wincott instead? Nobody is going to use it next to a loud and annoying arterial traffic sewer. So dumb.