Project Essentials / dataBase – detailed project information, floor plans, renderings
Projects & Construction Thread
Platform Condos (was The Greenwood) 
1177 Danforth Ave, Toronto
Developer: Sierra Building Group, Fortress Real Developments

Platform Condos (was The Greenwood) | 31m | 9s | Sierra | Kirkor Architects

Discussion in 'Buildings' started by AlbertC, May 5, 2015.

  1. AlbertC

    AlbertC Senior Member

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2007
    Messages:
    3,816
    Likes Received:
    999
    Location:
    Davenport
    #1

  2. RButler

    RButler New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2014
    Messages:
    40
    Likes Received:
    2
    Nice to see some action on the Danforth with this site and the Diam Developments project closer to Main Street.
     
    #2
  3. LUVIT!

    LUVIT! Active Member

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2008
    Messages:
    566
    Likes Received:
    299
    This will improve this corner greatly! I have been wondering for long time why the Danforth has been so slow to densify. Especially between Pape/Jones and Broadview.
     
    #3
  4. T-Bor

    T-Bor Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2010
    Messages:
    152
    Likes Received:
    3
    Location:
    Toronto/South Korea
    Great news overall. Seems a bit steep though at an average price of $550/foot.
     
    #4
  5. RButler

    RButler New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2014
    Messages:
    40
    Likes Received:
    2
    I think that is what Carmelina was selling for near the end, debatable which location is better. Sierra is more experienced than the Tre Whoever guys that did Carmelina if that matters.
     
    #5
  6. mjl08

    mjl08 Senior Member

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2008
    Messages:
    2,706
    Likes Received:
    771
    Location:
    Toronto
    Great news for the intersection. That Beer Store attracts a lot of undesirables.
     
    #6
  7. Forgotten

    Forgotten Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2013
    Messages:
    513
    Likes Received:
    112
    One man or woman's "undesirables" is another's brother or sister, son or daugther.
     
    #7
  8. mjl08

    mjl08 Senior Member

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2008
    Messages:
    2,706
    Likes Received:
    771
    Location:
    Toronto
    I agree that "undesirables" could be misconstrued as insensitive. Regardless, it is a cold, unfriendly intersection that is a magnet for prostitution and drug peddling and where two shootings have occurred in the last six years.
     
    #8
  9. Skeezix

    Skeezix Senior Member

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2007
    Messages:
    4,342
    Likes Received:
    2,659
    Location:
    East of this, west of that
    There was recently an article on this in Novae Res Urbis. Basically, hard to assemble the small parcels, and many of the parcels aren't particularly deep.
     
    #9
  10. renvel

    renvel Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2009
    Messages:
    192
    Likes Received:
    2
    Danforth

    It depends how big & deep pocketed the developer is...
    Everything is happening in due time.
    I do not think , that the Danforth turn will be in very distant future. May be , it is starting to happen already now...
     
    #10
  11. Gratty

    Gratty New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2009
    Messages:
    34
    Likes Received:
    2
    Location:
    North York Centre
    I think it's more than the inability to assemble small parcels. Look at the new LCBO and Shoppers Drug Mart buildings that went in on the north side between Chester and Broadview. Both are large 2 storey structures where 2-3 more floors of residential units could have easily been added above them. It's much cheaper to bring more residents to existing subway infrastructure vs. building new subways and yet we end up with this - I blame the local councillor and her fellow city councillors for lacking the political will to expedite development along the bloor/danforth 'Avenues'
     
    #11
  12. Skeezix

    Skeezix Senior Member

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2007
    Messages:
    4,342
    Likes Received:
    2,659
    Location:
    East of this, west of that
    Okay, but you're talking about something different, which is heights more in line with traditional Danforth development, rather than the midrise projects discussed in Novae Res Urbis or the project that is the subject of this thread. I agree that those two sites should have been at least three storeys. Part of the problem there is that the landlords each secured tenants who are notorious in their preference for single-storey boxes where the opportunity exists. I'm also not sure that the economics of an extra floor or two are worth it - can be expensive to build, potentially impacts ceiling heights on the ground level, and hard(er) to lease to ground floor tenants. Also, the entrance to Playter Estates is likely not the best spot on the Danforth to try additional height on for size - better to establish precedent elsewhere on the Danforth. IIRC, there was a major battle in the 1980s for the old used car lot at Danforth and Jackson, where an apartment building proposal was defeated (and the site eventually became Carrot Common).

    I agree that the City talks a lot of nice talk about midrise development, but fails to back up its words with concrete action.
     
    #12
  13. Tulse

    Tulse Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2010
    Messages:
    2,349
    Likes Received:
    401
    Speaking of that same area, the City has purchased the lot on the corner of Danforth and Playter for...a parking lot. Again, so much for midrise development.
     
    #13
  14. maestro

    maestro Senior Member

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2007
    Messages:
    6,390
    Likes Received:
    1,368

    If it was easy to plop some extra floors residential on top it would be done more often. Two very different markets. Few companies specialize in both. The building's structure would be more expensive, more complex and, with a compromised commercial floor area compared to this cheap, disposable, big box stores.
     
    #14
  15. interchange42

    interchange42 Administrator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2007
    Messages:
    20,927
    Likes Received:
    13,383
    Location:
    by the Humber
    …which is why we need bylaws that stipulate minimum density on main streets. A single-storey LCBO or Shoppers Drug Mart over a full site could always be a two-storey retail unit with a "compromised commercial floor area" with more development above it. If retailers like the LCBO don't want to deal with developments that complex, screw 'em. They don't have to buy and build, they can always lease space in other developments. Otherwise, if they do buy, they can partner with a developer that can manage a multi-use project.

    As a crown corporation, the LCBO should develop in line with other directives of the provincial government, including the Places To Grow act which stipulates intensification. The LCBO should be a model corporate citizen when it comes to urbanism, not a pariah.

    42
     
    #15
    TheKingEast and greenleaf like this.

Share This Page