Toronto Pinnacle One Yonge | 344.58m | 105s | Pinnacle | Hariri Pontarini

DavidCapizzano

Senior Member
Member Bio
Joined
Jan 12, 2017
Messages
1,553
Reaction score
6,971
Location
Toronto
I can't help but wonder if seeing the recently completed CIBC Square 1 made them rethink the crystal/chamfered direction out of concern that it might be too similar to what is happening there. Maybe they wanted to make the three phases more cohesive so they decided to pursue a direction more influenced by phase 1... Obviously speculation but I am curious to know what the thought process was like behind the scenes here. Emphur is correct in that this is essentially a re-skin - albeit a dramatic and unexpected one!

It is odd though, considering they've commissioned high quality marketing renders for the previous design and even had a huge sales model built! It looks like the materials here will be basically the same as what is happening on phase 1 plus the inclusion of white metal vs silver... Phase 1 has turned out nicely so I have no doubt this will look good as well. I do worry about how they'll execute some of those lower balcony details, but I guess we'll find out soon enough.
 

wmedia

Senior Member
Member Bio
Joined
Apr 11, 2010
Messages
1,118
Reaction score
4,203
Location
Toronto
After my initial shock, I'm actually liking the organic "spinal" look to the podium transition in the new version. Anyway, here's where we're at today. P3 formwork on south side, and P4 poured on north side.

20211207_101152.jpg
 

Sky High Arch

New Member
Member Bio
Joined
Feb 21, 2021
Messages
79
Reaction score
51
What I believe they tried to do was to open up the view from within the units to look out. The gold fins where obstructions of the the view and on some floors I would assume it really wasn't in the best location.
 

UtakataNoAnnex

Senior Member
Member Bio
Joined
Mar 5, 2020
Messages
5,098
Reaction score
7,408
In some ways it looks more futuristic and cleaner. The real worry is if they cheap out on the glass or concrete whitening.
I was worried about that too. But I think it's more an exercise to make the 3 buildings more consistent with each other design ways. So quality of materails may not be sacrifice in doing so. It will just look different from what we getting used to before the recent changes where announced.
 

limer

New Member
Member Bio
Joined
Jul 9, 2021
Messages
73
Reaction score
887
The updated design looks more like the older one than it appears - the renderings are in different lighting making the new one look 'cheaper'. The real proof would be in the actual material.
The balconies are definitely bolder and whitened (and wider in Sky Tower) making the buildings more Toronto-esque.

I still think these will look great on the skyline. We can lament all day over new renders, but this will ultimately come down to materials, and the execution of Phase 1 gives me hope.

EDIT: seems as though I used an even older render of Sky Tower. @emphur is correct, the balconies are essentially unchanged besides the whitening.
skytower2.png
skytower.png
 
Last edited:

egotrippin

Senior Member
Member Bio
Joined
Jul 7, 2007
Messages
2,586
Reaction score
1,525
I'd call the redesign more of a lateral move, not necessarily worse or better. They're nice enough buildings but I still think they're pretty conservative for such a prominent, landmark location. I mean if not for their height, would these really stand out?
 

Top