Exactly where are you getting the idea that Vaughan is supporting six 40-floor buildings as opposed to three 80-floor buildings on the proposed site?
I think AD meant development in the Entertainment District as a whole, not this specific site. That in turn was in response to the argument that Mirvish-Gehry represents an unprecedented strain on local infrastructure. Since it doesn't matter for infrastructure whether people are living in 3x80 or 6x40, 12x20 or whatever combination of buildings, it's a bit misleading to suggest Mirvish-Gehry will be some kind of undue strain on local infrastructure. If the area was really so close to bursting open, why are we currently adding soo many units as it is?