M3 at M City | 260m | 77s | Rogers Real Estate | IBI Group

civdis

Active Member
Member Bio
Joined
Sep 19, 2008
Messages
157
Reaction score
18
Not sure if this has been reported here (apologize if it has, but don't have time to review all of the posts) but i have it from an insider at the city that the third tower will be 77 floors. He advised that there is no height limit in Missy and that they have reduced the number of towers and tacked the height onto the 3rd tower. It is subject to shadow and wind studies.
 

alexanderglista

Senior Member
Member Bio
Joined
Jan 23, 2014
Messages
1,769
Reaction score
2,622
Location
Oakville
Not sure if this has been reported here (apologize if it has, but don't have time to review all of the posts) but i have it from an insider at the city that the third tower will be 77 floors. He advised that there is no height limit in Missy and that they have reduced the number of towers and tacked the height onto the 3rd tower. It is subject to shadow and wind studies.
That would make it the tallest residential tower outside of downtown Toronto. Wow. Bring it on.
 

innsertnamehere

Superstar
Member Bio
Joined
Mar 8, 2010
Messages
14,217
Reaction score
8,767
That would also make it by far the tallest suburban building in North America.. (there is one taller in suburban Houston, but is technically in the central municipalities boundaries).
 

ericmacm

Active Member
Member Bio
Joined
Dec 31, 2015
Messages
269
Reaction score
364
Location
Windsor
Wow, a 77 floor tower in Mississauga. I just hope it looks unique and not like a bigger brother of M-City phase 1 and 2.

It is also kind of a weird spot to build a much taller tower given that it's on the outskirts of "downtown", but the skyline will be getting heavy on that side anyway. Hopefully it looks good.
 

toaster29

Active Member
Member Bio
Joined
Mar 4, 2015
Messages
263
Reaction score
89
Not sure if this has been reported here (apologize if it has, but don't have time to review all of the posts) but i have it from an insider at the city that the third tower will be 77 floors. He advised that there is no height limit in Missy and that they have reduced the number of towers and tacked the height onto the 3rd tower. It is subject to shadow and wind studies.
Not the case near Pearson.
 

Jasonzed

Senior Member
Member Bio
Joined
Jul 12, 2010
Messages
6,703
Reaction score
8,689
Location
Mississauga
Wow, a 77 floor tower in Mississauga. I just hope it looks unique and not like a bigger brother of M-City phase 1 and 2.

It is also kind of a weird spot to build a much taller tower given that it's on the outskirts of "downtown", but the skyline will be getting heavy on that side anyway. Hopefully it looks good.
Per Jonathan Flame, the planner responsible for this case file, the 3rd tower will be different from the first two buildings. The render won't be available until later this year when Rogers submits their application.
 

maestro

Senior Member
Member Bio
Joined
Apr 23, 2007
Messages
7,155
Reaction score
1,951
I can't say I like the idea of fewer towers. It just puts more emphasis on the block scaled podiums. 77 floors is impressive. Jersey City aspirations in Vancouverism built form.
 

ericmacm

Active Member
Member Bio
Joined
Dec 31, 2015
Messages
269
Reaction score
364
Location
Windsor
Not the case near Pearson.
There is also a height limit outside of the Mississauga city centre, limited to 25s, if I recall correctly. Although this is currently being challenged by a development in Erin Mills that wants to go up to 36s.
 

FMCS

Active Member
Member Bio
Joined
Oct 1, 2014
Messages
288
Reaction score
87
Location
Hockley, On
And no it does not affect Pearson airport at all, both eastbound approaches are quite a bit north of the city Centre!
 

Top