George Brown College: The Arbour | 52.42m | 10s | George Brown | Moriyama & Teshima

Which of the four finalist design teams' concept do you prefer?

  • Moriyama & Teshima Architects + Acton Ostry Architects

  • Patkau Architects + MJMA

  • Provencher Roy + Turner Fleischer

  • Shigeru Ban + Brook McIlroy


Results are only viewable after voting.

someMidTowner

¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Staff member
Member Bio
Joined
Sep 2, 2011
Messages
9,147
Reaction score
13,656
Location
(Former) Ward 16
Resubmitted with new docs!
If anyone with a bit of spare time wants to start looking for whatever goodies are included in that link.
 

AlvinofDiaspar

Moderator
Member Bio
Joined
Apr 22, 2007
Messages
29,234
Reaction score
18,956
Location
Toronto
Nothing particularly new, from the Architectural Plans:

1582900411232.png


1582900426435.png


1582900549357.png


1582900571796.png


1582900584105.png


1582900607561.png

(GBC/MTArch)

AoD
 

ADRM

Senior Member
Member Bio
Joined
Oct 2, 2015
Messages
5,243
Reaction score
13,880
Resubmitted with new docs!
If anyone with a bit of spare time wants to start looking for whatever goodies are included in that link.

Unexciting amendments to the daycare space; the addition of an entrance on Queens Quay; minor adjustments to the bridge; and a small increase in overall GFA seem to be more or less the extent of the changes.
 

smably

Senior Member
Member Bio
Joined
Jun 26, 2009
Messages
1,375
Reaction score
3,264
The May 3rd, 2019 Site Plan Control application has been revised in a number of areas to address the comments received and matters raised through the approvals process. In particular, as key amendments to this resubmission, we have revised the daycare outdoor play area to address comments from City Planning and Urban Design, added an entrance along Queens Quay to address comments from City Planning and Waterfront Toronto, and revised the bridge connecting The Arbour to Daphne Cockwell from two-storeys to one-storey between Level 5 of The Arbour and the existing Level 6 of Daphne Cockwell. Further, there have been minor refinements to the proposed gross floor area and floor space index, among others.
 

Full Metal Junkie

Active Member
Member Bio
Joined
Apr 27, 2018
Messages
550
Reaction score
1,793
Location
Humber Bay Shores
Not sure if this is a given for any development on the waterfront, but it was a pleasant surprise for me:

Unit paving to be replaced by granite paving on concrete base as per queens quay public realm details.
Unit pavers and assembly to match and continue from adjacent Menkes 'Waterfront Innovation Centre' development.

1582915280322.png


Looks like there will be an almost continuous stretch of the Pan-Am maple leaf pavers all the way from the Music Gardens through to the George Brown campus (with the only gap in pavers between Westin and Redpath). I wonder if this will continue with the other developments east of the Arbour.
 

smably

Senior Member
Member Bio
Joined
Jun 26, 2009
Messages
1,375
Reaction score
3,264
Not sure if this is a given for any development on the waterfront, but it was a pleasant surprise for me:

Unit paving to be replaced by granite paving on concrete base as per queens quay public realm details.
Unit pavers and assembly to match and continue from adjacent Menkes 'Waterfront Innovation Centre' development.

View attachment 233549

Looks like there will be an almost continuous stretch of the Pan-Am maple leaf pavers all the way from the Music Gardens through to the George Brown campus (with the only gap in pavers between Westin and Redpath). I wonder if this will continue with the other developments east of the Arbour.
Note that this is on the sheet labeled "Landscape Plan / Ultimate Condition". If you look at the landscape plan two pages earlier, the interim condition (to be constructed with this development and to remain in place until QQE reconstruction) is largely similar to the status quo -- no maple leaf pavers, bike path directly adjacent to the roadway.
 

Marcanadian

Moderator
Member Bio
Joined
Jul 30, 2007
Messages
3,922
Reaction score
9,654
This Site Plan Control application resubmission has been revised in several areas to address the comments received and matters raised through the approvals process from Children’s Services, Urban Forestry, Development Engineering, and regarding the air quality and noise reports/notes (Redpath, Golder, MECP). Revisions to drawings and reports are generally minor in nature. There have been minor refinements to items such as the soil volume, available roof space, and number of trees planted, as well as additional details provided regarding the bench, outdoor playground fence, and PV panels on the roof. Revisions were made to address Children Services comments, such as adding an exterior door to the daycare. Annotation was added upon request from ECS, and minor revisions were made to the landscape cost estimate and various reports (FSR, SWM report, HydroG report and Summary as well as the groundwater review form). In terms of project statistics, there have been minor refinements to the proposed gross floor area and floor space index, as well as to setbacks.

g4gew.JPG
hvwzs.JPG
32fa.JPG
32fwas.JPG
312sdc.JPG


 

UtakataNoAnnex

Senior Member
Member Bio
Joined
Mar 5, 2020
Messages
1,382
Reaction score
1,388
I still like my term of Woodalism...as this building is design by the folks who gave our Science Centre, Brutalism.
 

Top