Automation Gallery
Superstar
I wonder what the Old Distillery buildings replaced in their construction - presumably something even older. That's a shame.
I suppose not much in 1859
I wonder what the Old Distillery buildings replaced in their construction - presumably something even older. That's a shame.
... and the folks who toiled away at the Distillery would probably be just as equally surprised to see what was done there!
^Now let's all play a game, and see how many inaccuracies there are in the statement above.... anybody??
Are you sure your remarks are on the right site? I think you meant to write them on porn site but mistakenly posted it here.
Though there's a reasonable metaphor there, i.e. a lot of this wish for "amazing" "monuments of the 21st century" reminds me of pubescent boys for whom feminine desirability is defined by the glossy plastic Barbie dolls on porn sites, to the point where they don't know how to handle real women unless said women groom themselves to look like said glossy porn-site girls.
I mean--sure, we could use a few monuments, just like we can use a few purty babes. But a lot of this obsession w/modern-day "amazing" seems, to me, to betray an inability to come to terms w/the pre-existing environment at large, never mind at this particular location.
Though there's a reasonable metaphor there, i.e. a lot of this wish for "amazing" "monuments of the 21st century" reminds me of pubescent boys for whom feminine desirability is defined by the glossy plastic Barbie dolls on porn sites, to the point where they don't know how to handle real women unless said women groom themselves to look like said glossy porn-site girls.
I mean--sure, we could use a few monuments, just like we can use a few purty babes. But a lot of this obsession w/modern-day "amazing" seems, to me, to betray an inability to come to terms w/the pre-existing environment at large, never mind at this particular location.
And there's a reason why the "porn" metaphor often comes up re skyscraper and new-architecture fanboy sites.
Not that this will have any teeth (sadly), "This report will recommend that City Council refuse the proposed demolition of four designated heritage properties at 266, 276, 284 and 322 King Street West as part of
Zoning By-law amendment application12-276890 STE 20 OZ. The proposed demolition of four designated buildings does not satisfy the requirements of the Planning Act,