Project Essentials / dataBase – detailed project information, floor plans, renderings
Projects & Construction Thread  I  Real Estate Thread
DUKE Condos 
2803 Dundas St. W. & Indian Grove, Toronto
Developer: TAS


DUKE Condos | 26m | 7s | TAS | Quadrangle

interchange42

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Apr 23, 2007
Messages
21,870
Reaction score
15,817
Location
by the Humber
There's also white brick going up on North Drive's "The High Park", also by Quadrangle. News at 11. Just saying.

42
 

ADRM

Senior Member
Joined
Oct 2, 2015
Messages
4,102
Reaction score
8,060

ProjectEnd

Senior Member
Joined
May 28, 2007
Messages
8,328
Reaction score
7,877
Until it becomes easier to propose and approve mid-rise in terms of a loosening by Planning of their demand that projects follow the Mid-Rise Guidelines to the letter (which is not how they were originally intended to be used and / or implemented), you're not going to see the explosion of mid-rise across the city that many would like. And with land values only increasing as current owners want to get their 'piece of the pie', I'd expect that new mid rise proposals will become fewer, not more.

For example, the three quotes below are taken from the 146-150 Laird Drive decision and illustrate precisely why it's so difficult and, unpalatable to propose mid-rise buildings in Toronto. Highly recommended reading for anyone questioning the importance of the OMB in the planning regime we currently have to deal with:

http://www.omb.gov.on.ca/e-decisions/pl150360-Oct-25-2016.pdf

1.JPG


2.JPG


3.JPG
 

Attachments

ADRM

Senior Member
Joined
Oct 2, 2015
Messages
4,102
Reaction score
8,060
Until it becomes easier to propose and approve mid-rise in terms of a loosening by Planning of their demand that projects follow the Mid-Rise Guidelines to the letter (which is not how they were originally intended to be used and / or implemented), you're not going to see the explosion of mid-rise across the city that many would like. And with land values only increasing as current owners want to get their 'piece of the pie', I'd expect that new mid rise proposals will become fewer, not more.

For example, the three quotes below are taken from the 146-150 Laird Drive decision and illustrate precisely why it's so difficult and, unpalatable to propose mid-rise buildings in Toronto. Highly recommended reading for anyone questioning the importance of the OMB in the planning regime we currently have to deal with:

http://www.omb.gov.on.ca/e-decisions/pl150360-Oct-25-2016.pdf

View attachment 94377

View attachment 94378

View attachment 94379
Bang on.

1) Long live the OMB (with some necessary reform that facilitates density as an end).
2) The other offshoot of our mid-rise guidelines is, somewhat counterintuitively, a chilling effect on better design -- if you follow the guidelines to a tee, you wind up almost by necessity with variations on a precise theme, leaving designers and developers with precious little room to break the mold.
 

ProjectEnd

Senior Member
Joined
May 28, 2007
Messages
8,328
Reaction score
7,877
Think, for example, of the two leading contenders in this years' poll: 383 Sorauren and Canary District. Neither follow the guidelines.

What's more, the original Mid Rise Guidelines consultant document was modified by planners who added things like the city-wide blanket 80% ROW setback and rear angular plane. These things are form-based and do not take into account the internal layout of a building which changes drastically from the excessively deep floors at the bottom to the non-functionally small ones at the top.

Interestingly for the thread we're in, a TAS employee was recently banned by Keesmaat on Twitter for politely suggesting that planners shouldn't be designing buildings...
 

modernizt

Senior Member
Joined
Feb 8, 2014
Messages
1,474
Reaction score
995
Even just the smallest pulling back of the glazing between retail units to delineate different storefronts would be welcome, but otherwise this one is looking pretty good. Totally flew under my radar.
 

ProjectEnd

Senior Member
Joined
May 28, 2007
Messages
8,328
Reaction score
7,877
Even just the smallest pulling back of the glazing between retail units to delineate different storefronts would be welcome, but otherwise this one is looking pretty good. Totally flew under my radar.
Not multiple storefronts. Only one retail unit here.
 

Tim1234

Active Member
Joined
Apr 11, 2016
Messages
101
Reaction score
42
This building looks good. Well done to everyone involved. Not easy to make good design decisions, execute properly, and make any money in the midrise development game.
 

Top