Project Essentials / dataBase – detailed project information, floor plans, renderings
Projects & Construction Thread
Clover on Yonge, The 
599 Yonge St, Toronto
Developer: Cresford Developments

Clover on Yonge, The | 148m | 44s | Cresford | architectsAlliance

Discussion in 'Buildings' started by Automation Gallery, Aug 25, 2012.

  1. Automation Gallery

    Automation Gallery Superstar

    Joined:
    May 5, 2007
    Messages:
    10,781
    Likes Received:
    869
    Location:
    South Parkdale
    A couple more mediocre structures to bite the dust on Yonge street.
    This is a huge block, and probably a fraction of what will be proposed

    593 YONGE ST
    OPA / Rezoning 12 235622 STE 27 OZ Ward 27
    - Tor & E.York Aug 24, 2012 --- --- --- ---
    Proposal to construct a 49 sty condo with 514 residential units, commercial at grade, maintain portion of Heritage building, and below grade parking. 587-599 YONGE ST, 2 & 4 DUNDONALD ST, 7 & 9 GLOUCESTER ST


    http://goo.gl/maps/VFJPV / http://goo.gl/maps/WcLyn
     
    #1

  2. dt_toronto_geek

    dt_toronto_geek Superstar

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2007
    Messages:
    10,910
    Likes Received:
    51
    Location:
    Downtown Toronto
    Mediocre? My heart can't take much more of this Yonge Street madness. The TTC must be having a fit with yet another project being built alongside the subway.
     
    #2
  3. Automation Gallery

    Automation Gallery Superstar

    Joined:
    May 5, 2007
    Messages:
    10,781
    Likes Received:
    869
    Location:
    South Parkdale
    I doubt it stops here
     
    #3
  4. greenleaf

    greenleaf Senior Member

    Joined:
    May 16, 2007
    Messages:
    2,355
    Likes Received:
    494
    Location:
    Downtown
    Damn, that's the entire side of that block to the parkette. Bar Volo is 587 Yonge.
     
    #4
  5. WiddleBittyKitty

    WiddleBittyKitty Felis catus

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2008
    Messages:
    564
    Likes Received:
    101
    I get the anxiety over another huge Yonge St project, but why would the TTC care? Everyone gets paid to evaluate another project and make sure that construction is safely built along the line. And if that does ruffle someone's feathers at the TTC, good, tough for them.

    I would miss Bar Volo. Nothing else here though.
     
    #5
  6. SP!RE

    SP!RE °°°°°°

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2007
    Messages:
    4,006
    Likes Received:
    6
    Location:
    Southcore
    The problem is that the subway can't handle all these new residents. Densification is a good thing *WHEN THE INFRASTRUCTURE IS BEING UPGRADED TO HANDLE IT*. Toronto City Hall doesn't understand that as they cater to every single new development.

    (*Waits to be called a NIMBY just because he doesn't think that EVERY single last project should be approved*).
     
    #6
  7. themarc

    themarc Senior Member

    Joined:
    May 10, 2011
    Messages:
    1,120
    Likes Received:
    1
    I live at downtown and I can count on 1 hand the number of times I take the subway in a given month. Its faster to walk everywhere.
     
    #7
  8. WiddleBittyKitty

    WiddleBittyKitty Felis catus

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2008
    Messages:
    564
    Likes Received:
    101
    Yeah SP!RE, I wouldn't call you a Nimby over that comment. My understanding is similar to themarc's; people living downtown are more likely to walk to work anyway. You'll also get some people currently riding in on the subway from the suburbs to move into these buildings and actually taking a small number of rides off the subway. All that said, yes, we have to improve our transit infrastructure. Bring on the DRL, please! The CityRail concept being discussed on UT lately sounds interesting too…
     
    #8
  9. 67Cup

    67Cup Active Member

    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2011
    Messages:
    525
    Likes Received:
    351
    Location:
    Humber Bay Shores
    I am not arguing against this point and certainly not denying improved infrastructure is necessary. I just wonder if the process actually works the othe way round, ie, the new development and increased density funds the infrastructure improvements.

    I am not totally making this up off the top of my head. The institution I am involved with in Vancouver has been part of a neighborhood development for ten years and we have been paying significant "Infrastructure Impact Charges."
     
    #9
  10. AlvinofDiaspar

    AlvinofDiaspar Moderator

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2007
    Messages:
    23,824
    Likes Received:
    9,305
    Location:
    Toronto
    No reasonable amount of development and s37 community benefits charges levied against development along the corridor can get you an increase in subway capacity in itself.

    AoD
     
    #10
  11. urbandreamer

    urbandreamer recession proof

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2007
    Messages:
    14,557
    Likes Received:
    394
    Location:
    renderpornstar.com
    I've often thought perhaps the Yonge line could be twinned--with a local line and an express line. Express stopping at say Bloor, Queen, Union, etc. Or Yonge Street could also have an express bus route added in addition to the subway. (Or more logical, given the width of the street, Bay Street could get a real surface bus route that isn't a premium service. As in running every 8 minutes, including up Avenue Road to at least St Clair.)

    That being said, most people in these condos either bike, walk or drive 90% of the time. Yonge Street will see dozens of highrise towers rise over the next few decades. Even in a down market investors are attracted to prime sites like this one.

    Although I doubt we'll see this building completed before 2020.
     
    Last edited: Aug 25, 2012
    #11
  12. 67Cup

    67Cup Active Member

    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2011
    Messages:
    525
    Likes Received:
    351
    Location:
    Humber Bay Shores
    In itself, agreed. But increased tax base helps, since we are not talking about one off payments but rather repeated ones. And, of course, the subway benefits the entire metropolitan area, which should contribute as a whole.

    By the way, the "IIC" did pay, not for a subway, but for sewer, water and utility upgrades.
     
    #12
  13. canarob

    canarob Senior Member

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2007
    Messages:
    1,183
    Likes Received:
    105
    Location:
    Markham
    I don't think development should ever be discouraged right next to a subway line, especially when it's a few blocks from Yonge and Bloor. As mentioned above, the lack of a DRL to take pressure off Yonge is the real issue. If anything, developments along already-crammed streetcar lines are probably causing more congestion than this project. I do agree that the city and metrolinx should prioritize the DRL at all costs though.
     
    #13
  14. Ramako

    Ramako Moderator

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2007
    Messages:
    4,564
    Likes Received:
    564
    Location:
    Toronto, ON
    I take the Yonge line from Finch to Queen every day for work. The amount of people that get on south of Bloor is incredibly miniscule, and is almost always less then the amount of people getting off. Condos in North York and the other suburbs do far more to increase the burden on the Yonge line that any condo going up downtown, because those who live in condos downtown are probably going to walk or bike to work.

    On a cynical note, it's become clear that we live in a politically reactionary city. If we sit around and wait for upgraded transit before increasing density, it will never happen. Sadly, the only way to spur change is to bring on a transit crisis by building to the point where council has no choice but to upgrade transit.
     
    #14
  15. cdr108

    cdr108 Senior Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2008
    Messages:
    4,650
    Likes Received:
    12
    i dont live in dt now but when i did, i rarely used the ttc ..... walked almost everywhere. it's so easy, quick and convenient.
     
    #15

Share This Page