CIBC SQUARE | 241.39m | 50s | Hines | WilkinsonEyre

  • Thread starter Suicidal Gingerbread Man
  • Start date

mburrrrr

Senior Member
Member Bio
Joined
Feb 9, 2010
Messages
1,231
Reaction score
16,694
Something to stay tuned too?

108B941A-1D2F-4015-B485-DA508DF0B331.jpeg


5F501EAD-E786-48F1-8D33-C666EBB86D19.jpeg


AE655DE4-9145-4471-BBEE-FBCA8BCFA4E8.jpeg


66B8028D-BA44-4610-B211-26BA2BD8CD6D.jpeg
 

Attachments

  • 5A9E6642-CC35-4BF3-893B-626F197FBD26.jpeg
    5A9E6642-CC35-4BF3-893B-626F197FBD26.jpeg
    448.8 KB · Views: 109
  • BC420CAA-EF6C-45DA-976F-6178FD0ACE7D.jpeg
    BC420CAA-EF6C-45DA-976F-6178FD0ACE7D.jpeg
    384.6 KB · Views: 110

Riseth

Active Member
Member Bio
Joined
Aug 11, 2020
Messages
725
Reaction score
5,154
Such a tight sight! Exciting to see them dig but then you realize it's gonna be another year or so until this actually starts rising above ground. At least we have the first tower to admire while we wait.
 

C-mac

Active Member
Member Bio
Joined
May 4, 2021
Messages
902
Reaction score
1,475
Such a tight sight! Exciting to see them dig but then you realize it's gonna be another year or so until this actually starts rising above ground. At least we have the first tower to admire while we wait.

You think it will be that long? I would think it will be well above ground in 6 months. All depends I guess, because 160 Front seemed to take a year to get where it's at now after shovels first went in the ground.
 

UtakataNoAnnex

Senior Member
Member Bio
Joined
Mar 5, 2020
Messages
4,798
Reaction score
6,907
They were not originally proposed as the same shape, but that changed as the design evolved: they will be the same shape.

42
Oh...almost missed this.

So to clarify, are we talking about the area of the construction site or the footprint of the building itself?

Different shape for the former; the same shape for the latter as I understand it. Unless I got that wrong.
 

Top