nrb
Active Member
Read the city document ffs. It was denied for the same reason the first proposal was denied in 2008. Emissions studies show that any building more than 16m in that location is getting gassed by the rubber plant and would be unsafe.
The developer returned with a slightly smaller proposal but did not address that issue. For some reason they expected a different outcome this time?
If they came back with a 4 or 5 story proposal it might be different.. but obviously it's not enough money for the developer.
The developer returned with a slightly smaller proposal but did not address that issue. For some reason they expected a different outcome this time?
If they came back with a 4 or 5 story proposal it might be different.. but obviously it's not enough money for the developer.