Toronto

663 King West | 63m | 19s | TC | Diamond Schmitt

interchange42

Administrator
Staff member
Member Bio
Joined
Apr 23, 2007
Messages
22,099
Reaction score
16,438
Location
by the Humber
663 and 665 King West are listed but not designated heritage buildings. It looks like a full replacement of 663 King West is planned. Anyone would be clearly nuts to suggest doing anything with the 665 King Street and corner elevations other than preserve them… but I could see some people not appreciating the bulk of the building's face on Bathurst. I appreciate it however, and I imagine many others do too. Both the heavily shaded and totally blank sections on those drawings will be the greatest focus of concern tonight, no doubt.

42
 

ProjectEnd

Senior Member
Member Bio
Joined
May 28, 2007
Messages
8,559
Reaction score
8,677
I believe the plan is full removal and replacement of the existing building with something that is 'notionally respectful' of what's there now.
 

maestro

Senior Member
Member Bio
Joined
Apr 23, 2007
Messages
6,876
Reaction score
1,718
My guess the shaded part is what is being retained which is very unfortunate. Just another one of those, let's squeeze as much density on the site as possible while not going overboard with the height.
 

interchange42

Administrator
Staff member
Member Bio
Joined
Apr 23, 2007
Messages
22,099
Reaction score
16,438
Location
by the Humber
I believe the plan is full removal and replacement of the existing building with something that is 'notionally respectful' of what's there now.
'Notionally'? As in "There's a building there now. We gonna tear dat down, and outta respect, we gonna put up anudder building. Very respectful like."

42
 

peter.d

New Member
Member Bio
Joined
Nov 16, 2009
Messages
19
Reaction score
28
The drawing appears to include 647 King St. W. as well (the current home of EFS nightclub), is that correct?
 

drum118

Superstar
Member Bio
Joined
Apr 24, 2007
Messages
13,949
Reaction score
6,308
Location
Mississauga, where cars rule city growth
Why don't we bow doze block by block of everything in the city core and start from scratch building everything new and hell with history. We will get rid of all those nice pre 1930 looking building as well the crap that has replace them and use a standard cookie cutter design to build something new.

Replace all the overhead as you rebuild the block by block great looking builds like this one. The one to the east can go easy that part of this design.

Who every going tonight meeting, speak up about the great mistake that about to happen here. I expect the city to jump start to make sure this building is protected as well oppose the development.
 

neuhaus

Senior Member
Member Bio
Joined
May 18, 2010
Messages
1,376
Reaction score
380
Location
Toronto
Yikes!
The two grotesque buildings that replaced that great brick warehouse building on the NW corner (pictured above) in the early 80's are perfect examples of what not to do.
I'm sure those buildings were marginally acceptable at that time but are now permanent eyesores. I could see where the clocks on 700 King W (aka Westside Lofts) came from, but it's more of a slap in the face to the past.
Don't let this happen, as I'm sure this design will look dated and unfortunate 30 years from now, just like diagonally across the street.

The original building should be restored to its original glory with residential or commercial lofts and anything on top should refrain from the clichéd glass and spandrel box with staggered balcony patterning you see everywhere. This prominent corner should be held to a very high level of design standards -- we've seen too many bad mistakes being built everywhere in the city.
 
Last edited:

Top