Not surprised with the increase in height given the cluster of 40-50 storey towers at Jarvis & Dundas, not to mention a proposed but yet-to-be approved 68 storey just south of that intersection. Design is meh - looks similar to Grid, although the splashes of brown may add some interest.Well......
This one is back, with a new application...............but she ain't 35s no more........in Toronto-esque style.........the proponent would now like 60s!
Underlying proponent is unchanged.
Architect has changed to IBI
View attachment 442663
View attachment 442664
View attachment 442665
The above are the only renders with this submission, at a size where I can capture the whole image. Below are enlarged, but partial images to reflect greater detail:
View attachment 442666
View attachment 442667
View attachment 442668
Ground Floor Plan:
View attachment 442669
View attachment 442670
North Elevation: (good illustration of the impact of the overhang)
View attachment 442671
View attachment 442672
Brief comments for now:
1) Height is being argued for based on nearest comparables that include Grid Condos at 52s and consideration of MTSA based on being 660M north-west of an Ontario Line Station.
2) Falls within the Sick Kids Flight Path, but is below the regulated maximum height.
3) Owner is unchanged from previous application; no involvement from Tricon is indicated, and no clear commitments to purpose-built rental as was previously suggested when Tricon became involved.
4) Owner is arguing no obligation concerning replacement of the rooming house units, but is willing to consider that a 'Community Benefit'.
I'll save the rest for after more sleep and some coffee!