Project Essentials / dataBase – detailed project information, floor plans, renderings
Projects & Construction Thread
1637 Bathurst 
1637 Bathurst Street, Toronto
Developer: Starlight Investments


1637 Bathurst | 19m | 4s | Starlight | RAW Design

PMT

Senior Member
Joined
Jul 13, 2016
Messages
2,620
Likes
4,253
Location
Turanna
#1
1637 BATHURST ST
Ward 21 - Tor & E.York District

►View All Properties

Prposal for rezoning related to a 4 storey resiential rental apartment building containing 67 units

Proposed Use --- # of Storeys --- # of Units ---

Applications:

Type Number Date Submitted Status
Rezoning 18 115438 STE 21 OZ Feb 9, 2018 Under Review
 

AlbertC

Senior Member
Joined
Apr 24, 2007
Messages
3,981
Likes
1,358
Location
Davenport
#3
Could be a pretty sizeable lot, with all these properties combined:

1637 BATHURST ST
1639 BATHURST ST
1641 BATHURST ST
1643 BATHURST ST
1645 BATHURST ST
 

interchange42

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Apr 23, 2007
Messages
21,386
Likes
14,333
Location
by the Humber
#5
The homes in behind won't want them going too tall either (and will kick up a fuss no matter what, actually) so if the plan does dig into the retaining wall and therefore limit the height on the east side by a storey, it'll go easy for them fight-wise with the neighbours.

42
 

thecharioteer

Senior Member
Joined
Jun 17, 2009
Messages
3,294
Likes
1,051
#10
The proposal does not really address the complicated topography of the location. As can be seen in the 1912 archival pic below, Bathurst north of the ravine was quite hilly:

31268897993_6fb15fb2bd_b.jpg


The retaining wall was built when Bathurst was regraded and resulted in a somewhat bucolic environment for the current 1950's era four-plexes.

bathurstburton.jpg


By lowering the grade, this environment will of course be lost and also result in a huge retaining wall at the rear property line (an issue the model does not address). I think that concerns with this proposal will go beyond simple NIMBY-ism.
 

Attachments

Joined
Mar 8, 2010
Messages
12,085
Likes
5,412
Location
Hipsterville
#11
You could front Bathurst with towns with parking in behind, and have an artificial grade to match existing grade above the parking when facing the existing houses to the east.

This is of course likely quite expensive as it involves a lot more excavation than currently proposed - especially considering the parking is proposed to be provided in a stacker system with little excavation.
 

interchange42

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Apr 23, 2007
Messages
21,386
Likes
14,333
Location
by the Humber
#12
By lowering the grade, this environment will of course be lost and also result in a huge retaining wall at the rear property line (an issue the model does not address). I think that concerns with this proposal will go beyond simple NIMBY-ism.
I don't think that they are planing to lower the grade: the retaining wall on Bathurst will sill be there.

42
 

Top