1602 Queen St. E. | ?m | 6s | True North | SMV

Lenser

Senior Member
Member Bio
Joined
Dec 7, 2011
Messages
2,782
Reaction score
2,597
Location
Leslieville
That's either gonna look great or look terrible. Materials, materials, materials.

Still, glad to see some proper infill on this stretch of Queen. It's in desperate need of some juicy densification.
 

interchange42

Administrator
Staff member
Member Bio
Joined
Apr 23, 2007
Messages
23,705
Reaction score
20,794
Location
by the Humber
The buildings rendered on either side of the building above are not at all like what is actually around 1602 Queen East. (Check the other images further up the tread to see what's actually there.) It makes me wonder if Old Stonehenge has misidentified the rendering on their website.

42
 

AlbertC

Superstar
Member Bio
Joined
Apr 24, 2007
Messages
12,607
Reaction score
22,713
Location
Davenport
I suspect there was some aspirational reaching towards what they'd want the neighbouring properties to ideally look like. Kind of like an inverse of the condo in a lush green meadow effect. It's set to an urban landscape but enhanced to look more contextually attractive.
 

concrete_and_light

Active Member
Member Bio
Joined
Oct 27, 2018
Messages
334
Reaction score
654
Done with nice materials I would not object to this type of building being built throughout the city. It's not the most wonderful building ever but as a baseline background standard, this is pretty good - especially the fine-grained streetscape.

The densely varied experience at human scale that goes on forever on many of our big east/west streets is one Toronto's best urban features IMO and major intensification of these great streets (which should and inevitably will happen) could damage that characteristic. Like even if it ends up being an ugly building it doesn't even matter on the balance it's still a win because most of Toronto's most interesting places are built in fairly bad looking but accessibly adaptable small spaces.
 

Top