Toronto

160 Front West | 240m | 46s | Cadillac Fairview | AS + GG

Filip

Senior Member
Member Bio
Joined
Apr 24, 2007
Messages
3,538
Reaction score
869
Location
Београд
Today I saw the parking lot at Simcoe/Front was fenced off with workers drilling holes and surveyors marking lines across the asphalt with all their equipment.

Anything happening here?
 

MetroMan

Senior Member
Member Bio
Joined
Apr 22, 2007
Messages
7,531
Reaction score
3,055
Location
Toronto
If they build something tall here, we'll have a new cluster of skyscrapers: Simcoe Place, RBC, Ritz, this building and the one that's in the planning stages for across the street.
 

cdr108

Senior Member
Member Bio
Joined
Apr 22, 2008
Messages
4,663
Reaction score
18
I don't understand why this city has a fascination with erecting super tall buildings in front of the waterfront that effectively builds a wall around the area considering the city is trying to make the QQ more pedestrian friendly and attract people.
 

Hypnotoad

Senior Member
Member Bio
Joined
Jun 26, 2007
Messages
1,205
Reaction score
2
Location
Downtown Toronto
What a great place for a supertall, if you demolished the two low rise buildings to the east of it as well.
That's a horrible idea... those buildings along Front St are some of the nicest on the street. Not everything has to be excessively tall, especially on a premiere street like Front.

The parking lot should be filled with a modest sized office or hotel tower, maybe the size of Telus tower.
 

marcus_a_j

Senior Member
Member Bio
Joined
Apr 23, 2007
Messages
2,828
Reaction score
487
I noticed the fencing on the weekend also. I thought maybe they were just repaving the parking lot figuring it will be several years before anything is feasible. I always thought this was the location of the rumoured Manulife building. It's probably one of the few locations that would be ideal for a true supertall, unless the City pulls out the shadowing card again.

What a great place for a supertall, if you demolished the two low rise buildings to the east of it as well.
Like CSW said, terrible idea. Those buildings still have quite a bit of charm, and if you were ever near there you'll see that all the bars and restaurants are nearly always busy, and just packed on game days.

I don't understand why this city has a fascination with erecting super tall buildings in front of the waterfront that effectively builds a wall around the area considering the city is trying to make the QQ more pedestrian friendly and attract people.
This is on the north side of Front Street, quite a ways away from the waterfront.
 

SP!RE

°°°°°°
Member Bio
Joined
Apr 23, 2007
Messages
4,006
Reaction score
7
Location
Southcore
Tear down the buildings to the east of the lot?! HELLZ NO. Absolutely not.

5 points off for khristopher.
 

maestro

Senior Member
Member Bio
Joined
Apr 23, 2007
Messages
6,803
Reaction score
1,687
^too romanesque for my tastes


I'm sick of this Manulife shit.

It's owned by Cadillac Fairview and represents the site of the third office tower in the Simcoe Place masterplan. Trust me, this tower won't be built anytime soon.

The Ritz Carlton, however, still has suites to sell.
 

khristopher

Senior Member
Member Bio
Joined
Aug 28, 2007
Messages
8,422
Reaction score
159
Location
Toronto, ON
That's a horrible idea... those buildings along Front St are some of the nicest on the street. Not everything has to be excessively tall, especially on a premiere street like Front.

The parking lot should be filled with a modest sized office or hotel tower, maybe the size of Telus tower.
Wait, does one of those buildings have a Jack Astors in it?
 

Automation Gallery

Superstar
Member Bio
Joined
May 5, 2007
Messages
11,699
Reaction score
2,005
Location
South Parkdale
Tear down the buildings to the east of the lot?! HELLZ NO. Absolutely not.

5 points off for khristopher.
Come on stop beating up on Kris, this location and the demolition of those derelict buildings have been mentioned many times in past threads`as a possible future supertall location``````````````````And again the same doom and gloomers have to remind us all constantly that nothing will be happening with this and other lots for quite a while..... Yes we all do live in the same world and very aware of the economy, but any new development proposals in the early stages wont be ready for occupancy for 5-7 years anyways.
 

Edward

Senior Member
Member Bio
Joined
Apr 23, 2007
Messages
1,832
Reaction score
4
Location
West Canada
Come on stop beating up on Kris, this location and the demolition of those derelict buildings have been mentioned many times in past threads`as a possible future supertall location
You must be talking of a different location. The building to the east with the Joe Badali's restaurant is hardly derelict.
 

adma

Superstar
Member Bio
Joined
Apr 23, 2007
Messages
16,309
Reaction score
973
None of them are exactly "derelict"--if you seek to wipe them out, might as well seek to wipe out everything on the "Mirvish" side of King save Royal Alex and PofW...
 

Translude15

Frank the Tank
Member Bio
Joined
Aug 12, 2008
Messages
583
Reaction score
155
I don't understand why this city has a fascination with erecting super tall buildings in front of the waterfront that effectively builds a wall around the area considering the city is trying to make the QQ more pedestrian friendly and attract people.
How does errecting a supertall deter the area from being "pedestrian friendly" and "attracting people"? I just don't see the logic in that statement. :confused:
 

Top