News   Jul 12, 2024
 1.5K     0 
News   Jul 12, 2024
 1.2K     1 
News   Jul 12, 2024
 438     0 

The Star: Toronto a suburb? It's begun

khris

Senior Member
Member Bio
Joined
Aug 28, 2007
Messages
8,714
Reaction score
755
Location
Toronto, ON
Toronto a suburb? It's begun
The city's a nice place to live but it's being eclipsed by economic powerhouses in the 905, report warns
Vanessa Lu
city hall bureau chief


ec7c7727440f96c1b42fdbc853c6.jpeg

RENÉ JOHNSTON/TORONTO STAR
Early morning cyclists in Woodbine Park pass the Toronto skyline April 7, 2008.


Toronto is at risk of becoming a bedroom community for the booming 905 regions, warns a new report by the Toronto Board of Trade.

Cities that were once outer suburbs are now growing employment areas as more businesses have pulled up stakes in the downtown core for cheaper real estate.

Meanwhile, the city itself faces increasing disparity between the wealthy, who buy downtown condos where factories once stood, and the poor who inhabit the increasingly deprived inner suburbs.

So Toronto remains an attractive place to live, but struggles to keep up with its neighbours on key economic indicators such as employment, productivity and income growth.

"It's a tale of two cities," president and CEO Carol Wilding said at yesterday's release. "We see the reverse, or mirror images, from the city proper versus the 905."

Wilding agreed with a release for the report that said Toronto has become a "magnet for living, while the surrounding municipalities form the more powerful economic engine."

"If you stand back, the data shows that at this point," said Wilding. "Given the employment growth that isn't there in the city centre – yet it is a hugely attractive place – suggests the doughnut effect. ... People flock to and live in the city ... but are actually travelling outwards in the region for employment opportunities."

The split between the two regions is reflected in a prosperity scorecard that compares the Toronto region with 20 others around the world on 25 important indicators.

While the Toronto region scored very well overall – tying for fourth place with Boston, New York and London, but behind Calgary, Dallas and Hong Kong – the findings show a growing gap between the city itself and surrounding communities. (The study is based on the Toronto Census Metropolitan Area, a tract that includes most of the GTA except Burlington and Oshawa.)

If the 416 and 905 area codes were ranked separately, the suburban regions would have taken second place on the world list – after Calgary – and Toronto would have fallen into the bottom half.

But Wilding credited Toronto city hall for taking steps to counteract the trend and boost economic growth, including a policy of gradually shifting more of the property tax burden from commercial and industrial property onto homeowners.

"I think from a policy perspective, we've put in place many of the changes the data would have suggested we do ... two years ago. We didn't wait," Mayor David Miller said yesterday, reacting to the report. However, he said, "Toronto starts from a very good place" as Canada's financial capital and the third biggest centre of information communications technology in North America.

"Council adopted a strategy two years ago because we didn't believe we could take success for granted," he added. "And I think the underlying data says we took the right step and we're on the right path."

He noted both the tax rate cuts and the creation of two new agencies, Build Toronto and Invest Toronto, to lure business and investment to the city.

Given that traffic is now jammed both ways on the Gardiner Expressway and the Don Valley Parkway in the morning rush hour, it hardly comes as a surprise that employment growth has been strong outside Toronto proper. But the data shows the gap is "far larger than people would have expected it to be," Wilding said.

Employment in the suburban regions grew by an average of 2.8 per cent a year between 2002 and 2007, compared with 1.1 per cent in the city of Toronto. In fact, most of the employment growth over the past two decades has occurred outside Toronto.

"That's a significant divide. Until we start to narrow that, then we aren't serving the interests of the region as a whole," Wilding said.

Average real GDP growth during the same period was just 1.2 per cent in Toronto – compared with 4.2 per cent in neighbouring cities.

After-tax income growth over the same period was 3.5 per cent in Toronto, compared with 5.9 per cent outside.

Deputy Mayor Joe Pantalone said the report's data is already a couple of years old and doesn't reflect recent actions the city has taken to stem the flow of jobs.

The report cites a 10.2 per cent growth in non-residential building permits in the surrounding regions, versus only 8.9 per cent in the city. But Pantalone pointed out that today, 4 million square feet of office buildings are under construction in Toronto, compared with only 1.5 million square feet in the 905.

"That's a historical reversal. It shows those policies are working," he said. "We have established new trend lines to correct that. And it seems to be working."

As Miller pointed out, the report isn't all bad news for the city.

It notes that Toronto is "a study in contrasts, struggling to keep pace on the economic fundamentals but scoring well on all the attributes of an attractive city."

Using research from the Conference Board of Canada, the report points out the city is doing well on indicators such as commuter travel choices, a young labour force, university education and percentage of jobs in the cultural industry. New infrastructure investments by the province, notably in transit, will also help make Toronto more competitive. Some 44 per cent of Toronto residents walk, bike or take transit to work, while only 13 per cent of residents outside Toronto do.

One of Toronto's biggest advantages is its diversity, with immigrants making up close to half of the city's residents. That puts it at Number 1 among the 21 global cities, above Los Angeles at 41 per cent and New York at 36 per cent.

But Board of Trade chair Paul Massara warned that the talent that exists among newcomers must not be squandered – and their integration has to be ensured.

"It's absolutely essential that we get this productive part of the economy working and enhance that," Massara said, noting governments have been working to improve settlement services.

With files from Paul Moloney


1 in 4
people in Toronto are low income. Just 1 in 8 are low income in the 905.

1.1%
employment growth average between 2002 and 2007 in Toronto, vs. 2.8% in 905.

0.3%
population growth (five-year average) in Toronto, vs. 3.5% in the 905

Source
 
With manufacturing in the 905 taking hits, I wonder if the growth will continue? Mind you, all those vacant factories are available for downtown businesses seeking lower rent.
 
People usually have this backwards ......

Warehouse and industrial space is vacancy level is considerbly lower in the 416 i.e. YES the % vacant is LOWER in the 416. Look up any industrial quarter report.

Moreover, the 416 has the lowest rents out of the 905. The difference is, growing stock - the 416 has reminded stagnate for 5-15 years or so and we have a fixed amount of industrial space. The only construction which does take place, is the conversion of old space to new which might pull up rates but does not attract more clients.

This is the case because warehousing industries and the like need to locate near clientele.

What we need to focus on is removing the business tax rate gap for 1. Secondly, it's everything outside of downtown (maybe Y&E, NYCC as well) that is taking a huge beating i.e. Toronto's suburbs themselves are what are in trouble ... in many many ways.
 
Moreover, the 416 has the lowest rents out of the 905.

The lowest net rents. The gross rents are about equal. This shows how futile Toronto's tax climate has become. Lower net rents translate to depressed assessment values. So while Toronto has a much higher tax rate, effectively, it does not receive greater revenue. A number of councillors and staff at city hall have failed to recognize this. Here is an example.
 
The article fails to mention other cities across the world face similar issues although with varying extents of severity.

The solution is simple but it requires strong local leadership. We've seen some of this with proposals to lower business tax rates relative to residential rates closing the difference between the 416 and 905. Unfortunately it's probably a case of; not enough and too slowly.

I think the problem it self doesn't lie with the 416 as a whole. 2 worlds are developing inside the 416 ... the outer half facing increasing unemployment rates while the center manages fine. This is the trend we really have to worry about
 
Let's cut through some of the bull from Miller and Pantalone.

It Toronto nearly a decade to move on the tax issue. Two years ago all the city did was recognize a problem that was more than ten years old. Prior to 'not waiting', it had successfully lobbied the province to allow it raise non-residential rates faster than mandated by provincial law. It is only after the city had lost thousands of jobs and had a shrinking commercial assessment base did it act. Even then, its first course of action fell far short of public suggestions.

Toronto also should stop milking its two office towers under construction as a sign of its new found prosperity. Unless drastic action is taken these will be the last of the type we see in a generation. Councillor Pantalone might want to consider that between 2000 and 2006, slightly over 14 million s.f. of office space has been developed across the GTA with the overwhelming majority (90%) taking place in suburbs. Mississauga itself, while being less than half the size of Toronto, had five times the amount as Toronto. To make matters worse, a large portion of Toronto's amount is being built by the city (the Courus building). This is because the private sector would not do it.
 
Glen:

Let's cut through some of the bull from Miller and Pantalone.

Well, considering they're the Socialists who bit the bullet and did the politically unpalatable...

Even then, its first course of action fell far short of public suggestions.

And I am sure there are other public suggestions of a contrary nature. That's why they are suggestions - everyone have their own vested interests.

Councillor Pantalone might want to consider that between 2000 and 2006, slightly over 14 million s.f. of office space has been developed across the GTA with the overwhelming majority (90%) taking place in suburbs.

Perhaps you should consider what the type of office space is constructed, vis-a-vis their location in the respective municipalities. Little to none of it is in the established urban core of said 905 regions - the greatest majority of these are greenfield developments. What does it speak about the pattern of office space developments?

To make matters worse, a large portion of Toronto's amount is being built by the city (the Courus building). This is because the private sector would not do it.

Huh? Just how much does Corus account for, vis-a-vis Bay Adelaide 1, Telus, RBC Dexia and 18 York (plus smaller projects such as 180 Queen)? Are all these government make-work projects?

AoD
 
Last edited:
Glen:



Perhaps you should consider what the type of office space is constructed, vis-a-vis their location in the respective municipalities. Little to none of it is in the established urban core of said regions.



Huh? Just how much does Corus account for, vis-a-vis Bay Adelaide 1, Telus, RBC Dexia and 18 York (plus smaller projects such as 180 Queen)?

AoD

While I agree Glen has a point ... yes we have 4million sqf under construction now what about the last 10 years. Clearly there's an issue?

But at the same rate one must stop and think ... of course there is going to be more growth in the undeveloped 905 and were not going to match that! Its a question of eliminating the non-market inequalities that exist between the regions.

To make my point more clear ... say taxes were the same (everything...) you'd still hear quite a few stories of businesses moving out, while you'd hear stories, more stories of new construction in Toronto. The point is some of this will happen and is inevitable but some of it is in our control.
 
taal:

Of course there is an issue - but it's a more complex one as evidenced by the pattern of urban development - what class of office space, what are the types of tenants, etc. What would be interesting to look at is places like Mississauga (which is getting closer to full buildout) and compare it to say Vaughan.

Personally, I think the focus should be on how to capitalize on the inner suburban belt - which quite frankly is underutilized but has potential given the relative accessiblity of the sites to the central core. The higher cost of operating and locating in Toronto must be justifiable somehow.

AoD
 
Last edited:
This probably won't last too long, the economic situation has brought down ol prices, but they WILL rise, as supply is not growing, but demand is. People and businesses will move back to Toronto as it mecomes too costly to live and operate in wasteland suburbia. In addition, more and more are becoming worried about the human effects of living in a car dependant area.

Plus, there is new office construction out there because they simply have more SPACE! This doesen't undermine Toronto's long term strengths though.
 
This probably won't last too long, the economic situation has brought down ol prices, but they WILL rise, as supply is not growing, but demand is. People and businesses will move back to Toronto as it mecomes too costly to live and operate in wasteland suburbia. In addition, more and more are becoming worried about the human effects of living in a car dependant area.

Plus, there is new office construction out there because they simply have more SPACE! This doesen't undermine Toronto's long term strengths though.

Absolutely. It's unfortunate (for studies like this; not in general terms) that downtown Toronto can't offer cheap commercial real estate with vast parking lots near highway off-ramps like the 905 can. But any benefit the 905 economy is currently enjoying from that cheap commercial real estate will inevitably be short-lived as these suburbans cities start running out of viable space to build.

I would like to see more of a detailed breakdown of these figures, though. I think the 'Toronto as a suburb' phenomenon might be more real when you look at, say, Etobicoke versus Mississauga or North York versus Vaughan/Richmond Hill.
 
It should be remembered that Bay Street was built in the suburbs of the Town of York. Though the years, industry went into the suburbs of West Toronto or New Toronto or Leaside, because of the cheaper land available at the time compared to the older parts of the city.
As the industries expanded or needed more space, they found they were constricted where they were. So they went looking where they could expand, in the suburbs.
 
Glen:

Well, considering they're the Socialists who bit the bullet and did the politically unpalatable...

The point is that they were pushed. Recall that another mayoralty candidate proposed a much more aggressive course of action.

And I am sure there are other public suggestions of a contrary nature. That's why they are suggestions - everyone have their own vested interests.

I am referring to the averaging of suggestions, as referred to in the background of ETBC.

Perhaps you should consider what the type of office space is constructed, vis-a-vis their location in the respective municipalities. Little to none of it is in the established urban core of said 905 regions - the greatest majority of these are greenfield developments. What does it speak about the pattern of office space developments?

That is a straw-man. Toronto's brownfields are equivalent to the 905's green fields. Where are they offices? As we have discussed before, the tax climate is not conducive in Toronto. So brownfield development turns into residential development.


Huh? Just how much does Corus account for, vis-a-vis Bay Adelaide 1, Telus, RBC Dexia and 18 York (plus smaller projects such as 180 Queen)? Are all these government make-work projects?

IIRC some of those got tax breaks.
 
Rubbish

The suggestion that the City of Toronto as a whole is in decline relative to its peer-group of suburban cities is rubbish.

Its not a matter of being politically 'left' or 'right' or liking or disliking David Miller.

Its a matter of the facts.

****

As noted by other posters above and by councillor Pantalone, there are almost 3 times as many square feet of commercial office space under construction in Toronto, as in the 905.

Contrary to Glen's assertion, none of RBC Dexia, Bay-Adelaide or the Telus/Union Tower received any special tax breaks either.

That said, the prospect of much lower business tax in the future may well have been a factor in construction decisions.

To date, a policy has been approved which by 2020 reduces the commercial tax rate in Toronto to 2.5 times the residential rate.

This has meant negligible tax increases in Toronto the last 2 years (for business) while 905 tax rates for business are increasing at a minimum of 3x the Toronto rate.

Additionally, it needs to be remembered that a significant portion of the Toronto business property tax bill is the Provincial Education Tax (over which the City has no control); the province, however, is busy cutting the rate in the 416 down to the same as the 905, with full implementation by 2014. However, the full reduction is in effect on new construction, immediately.

While this is not currently true for the City of Toronto portion of the property tax bill; the City HAS REQUESTED permission from the province of Ontario to deliver the full business property tax reduction on all new developments, permission is expected shortly.

There are at LEAST, 3 more significant office developments that are LIKELY to break ground in Toronto in the next 12 months. Together they represent another 1,000,000 sf ft +

***

We're those advantages (or reduced disadvantages) not enough; the City is also waiving development charges on most non-retail commercial development.

This could mean a construction cost advantage of $1M on 100,000sqft property.

***

On top of that is the City's new strategic tax break which Glen alluded to for new development that is considered highly desirable.

This special "tax grant" can be as much as 40% of a new development's total property tax bill over the next 10 years. This grant would clearly mean a drastic Tax Advantage for the City of Toronto over the 905 in total property costs for desired new developments.

The first 2 beneficiaries were the new Canadian Tire headquarters going up at Sheppard near Leslie, and the Woodbine Live development at the racetrack which includes retail, residential AND significant new office space.

***

Now having pointed out that Toronto as a whole is doing fine, and taking the requisite steps to make sure it stays that way.....

Let me note that the '905' is facing enormous new troubles.

There is of course, the vast manufacturing decline, which not only means increased unemployment, and low-income people, and therefore higher draws on social services, but also depleted commercial tax assessments, which will end up meaning higher tax rates for businesses in the 905, as we are already seeing. Due to residential tax rates being substantially higher in the 905, the only real avenue for the area is a higher business tax rate. This is especially true for built-out municipalities where development charge revenue was significant and will be declining precipitously in the next few years.

Add to that, that the job losses are not just in manufacturing but in the head office operations of places like Nortel, and you will see notably higher unemployment in many 905 communities in the next year.

****

All this and that is without taking into account any increase in gas prices or any budgetary pressure on 905 Cities for better services or to deal with costs of aging infrastructure.

The City is going to be fine.

****

There is a legitimate point that Toronto's inner suburbs have been in modest decline in the last decade or 2.

That was to be expected.

However, beyond any benefits from lower business tax rates, and lower residential tax rates to boot (vs. 905), look for some very significant investments in the inner-burbs in the next decade.

A short-list

1) Massive renewal of public housing sites, including Lawrence Heights, and the Jane-Finch area.

2) Spadina Subway Extension

3) Six-points intersection in Etobicoke and a facelift of the south-Etobicoke industrial area.

4) Major investments in transit and associate streetscape improvements that will renew Eglinton, Sheppard and Kingston Road.

5) The overhaul of the 427, due to involve several aesthetic improvements to the abutting areas.

6) Toronto gateway investments, look for new parks and landscaping features on Kingston Road/Highway 2 as you enter the City starting this year.

7) The suburban 'catch-up' of service quality in libraries and rec. centres.
- library hours will expand this year and next
- a dozen suburban branches are being rebuilt/expanded over the next 4 years
- new rec centres in York, Jane-Finch and the Warden Woods areas.

********

Bottom line. The City will be just fine. :D
 

Back
Top