News   Feb 05, 2026
 251     0 
News   Feb 05, 2026
 965     1 
News   Feb 05, 2026
 558     0 

Tax Increment Financing

AlvinofDiaspar

Moderator
Member Bio
Joined
Apr 22, 2007
Messages
34,640
Reaction score
32,809
Location
Toronto
From the Globe, by John Barber:

Radical proposal under all those goofy ideas: Tax incentives for developers creating jobs
John Barber
The Globe and Mail
Nov 28, 2007 A16

Yesterday Toronto deputy mayor Joe Pantalone invoked the highest principles of social justice in his impassioned plea on behalf of the most vulnerable Torontonians - "the people with carts" - protesting the Royal Ontario Museum's request to remove a pesky vendor from the postcard view of its new Crystal.

Perhaps he was inspired by last week's grand ideological outcry against a plan to introduce new street foods on city-owned carts, which elevated a modest proposal into a dangerous Communist plot. Vendo-mania has overtaken city hall!

If that isn't sufficiently entertaining, you can enjoy fairy stories about Councillor Rob Ford being "reprimanded" for "not spending enough taxpayer's money," as one news outlet reported yesterday. Or surf to the unpalatable Etobicoker's website to find out how much deputy mayor Sandra Bussin spent on "hard liquor" during dinner breaks from council last month.

Or join in the vigorous debate now rocking city hall as to whether or not councillors should be shot, as one columnist demanded, which inspired an indignant Mayor David Miller to invoke the sacred name of "my Uncle Jim, who fought for the right to debate and discuss public policy."

And if none of that's enough to grab you, we can rescue another goofy idea from the reject pile - like a municipal tax on bottled water - and pretend it's about to happen. When it becomes impossible to disguise the fact that the mayor and senior city staff rejected the proposal months ago, killing all chance of it being implemented, we can find another outrage for your amusement.

As an alternative, you might consider the emergence of major new policy that promises to transform Toronto - in particular a new report from top officials recommending lavish cash incentives for new commercial development anywhere in the city. It's dull stuff, but something has to fill the back pages.

Some might even call it radical. After years standing on the sidelines while competing cities lavished developers with grants and bonuses, Toronto is about to enter the game in a big way. Under the new plan promoted by deputy city managers Sue Corke and Joseph Pennachetti, developers could soon be receiving millions of dollars in grants to locate new jobs within city limits.

The fundamental fact driving the new policy, so easy to overlook amid the ideological warfare, is that Toronto has lost 54,000 jobs over the past 17 years, a period during which the 905 region gained more than 700,000 new jobs.

Modest efforts to reduce business taxes have overthrown Toronto's reputation as Canada's most heavily taxed city - the new champion being Vancouver - but they have done little to encourage new investment. Recognizing that, the new report recommends incentives so generous no investor could fail to notice.

The heart of the proposed scheme is something called a "tax increment equivalent grant" (TIEG) that developers will receive to build new workplaces that increase a property's assessment by an amount equivalent to the grant. The grants will be "funded entirely from new incremental tax revenues that, but for the provision of financial incentives, the city may not otherwise have realized," according to the report.

In effect, the scheme would create a 10-year tax holiday for any significant development that produces good jobs - with the savings offered up front, in cash. Having pussyfooted around it for years, the city is preparing an uncharacteristically bold response to a nagging problem.

The only danger is that the inmates of city hall might become bored with their current diversions and turn their attention to serious economics. Although unlikely to occur, that could wreck everything.
_________________________________________________________________

And here is the city report:

http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2007/ed/bgrd/backgroundfile-8924.pdf

AoD
 
Very, very happy to see the City exploring some more innovative (by Canadian standards anyway) financial options to attract business. TIF is widely used in the US for capital projects--not just to lure businesses--most famously when Boston sold bonds to pay for Post Office Square against anticipated future assessment hikes. Also, incidentally, sort of how Pearson pulled off a $4Bn renovation without a cent of public money.

While I certainly agree with the thesis that Toronto and other Canadian cities are desperately under-resourced for their tasks there's a wide range of alternative financing options to get things done that we usually don't even touch.
 
These subsidies are probably a good way to go. Toronto has had abysmal job creation and retention performance, and we have to do something about it.

Another tax reform I'd like to see, and this one's ambitious, is a British-style system of taxing planning gain. If the City invests or rezones, there's no reason why private developers should get all of the benefit. A tax on planning gain would recover some of the increase in value to a property derived from rezoning and possibly from certain infrastructure improvements. If a farmer sells his land to a developer for $500,000 and then that developer gets the municipality to rezone the land for tract housing, the value of that land could soar ten times or more, solely based on a change in municipal policy. It's hardly reasonable that the developer collects the entire windfall. In Toronto's hot condo market, it could raise a fortune, and it's a pretty fair tax.
 
Toronto joins the race for jobs with a tax break for developers creating employment


JOHN BARBER

December 12, 2007

Fiscal conservatives aren't the only ones who can play the tax-cutting game. Few noticed when the Toronto mayor with a portrait of Tommy Douglas on his wall snuck into the action in his first term, but now he's playing for real.

The fast-track new plan he urged through council yesterday could virtually eliminate municipal taxes for 10 years on a broad variety of developments that produce new jobs.

For decades Toronto remained content to stand on its own merits while competing cities lured investment with increasingly lavish tax breaks and cash incentives. Permissive provincial legislation - and continuing job losses - have combined to reverse that long-standing policy in an instant.

"This is a policy tool designed to allow the city to compete on the international stage," Mayor David Miller claimed at the beginning of a brief debate.

Traditional left-wing concerns about joining "a race to the bottom" of the urban economic barrel made little impression on council, which endorsed the new plan in a 40-0 vote - a unanimous show of support that demonstrated an unprecedented consensus on a substantive issue.

In the mayor's words, the tax breaks became compelling social initiatives. "In a city that has become increasingly marked by two 'haves' - people who have and people who don't - we have a duty to increase prosperity," Mr. Miller said. "That's what my mandate's about."

"Fighting poverty is a shared responsibility," he added. "We have an opportunity to do that by creating jobs."

The basic instrument of the new program will be "tax increment equivalent grants" to developers of qualifying new workplaces, which will allow them to avoid paying taxes on the increased value of the new developments for a period of 10 years.

Unlike outright tax-rate reductions, the break is temporary, not permanent. In addition, the city will keep the base revenue generated by the affected properties before the subsidized improvements.

"All this approach does is use some of the increase in tax revenues that you would get from new commercial development in appropriate areas of the economy to give, in effect, a little subsidy," the mayor said. "And it ends after 10 years."

Much remains to be determined in the few months council set aside to implement the new scheme - including what percentage of incremental taxes will be refunded and what other incentives might be added into the mix.

It is conceivable, even likely, that developers of contaminated land in economically deprived "priority neighbourhoods" will pay no extra taxes at all for at least 10 years.

The question of which types of investment will qualify for grants also remains outstanding. The plan targets six sectors, including aerospace, tourism, film and information technology, while excluding such proven job-creators as the real estate and financial-service sectors. That could change, but any arrangement will almost certainly produce incessant squabbles and pleas about which projects are grantable.

A new citywide incentive program will have the undeniable virtue of cleaning up the hodge-podge of local efforts that attempt to do the same thing for individual neighbourhoods. It's a big gesture that makes an easy selling point, which is what Toronto economic development officials say they need to attract any attention to the city. But will even that be enough?

In a world where cities have become increasingly desperate to attract investment - to the point of paying serious bribes to existing businesses that threaten to leave - Toronto's bold new move may turn out to be nothing more than another baby step.

jbarber@globeandmail.com
 
About time. And for some additional context, TIF has been a fixture in many American cities for years, including some of the most progressive transit cities. Jurisdictions like California, Portland and Dallas employ TIF as part of their incentives to encourage transit-friendly development.

Toronto, in fact, Ontario needs to do the same. Offer tax-incremental-financing for developers as an incentive to build near transit.
 

Back
Top