News   Oct 10, 2024
 543     0 
News   Oct 10, 2024
 462     0 
News   Oct 10, 2024
 434     1 

Symposium: Designing Transit Cities (Nov 19-20)

In GraphicMatt's version, you ensure that monopolies charge reasonable prices by making sure that their owner (the government) has no incentive to charge higher prices. I don't think that works.

Government owners would have just as many incentives to manipulate prices as a private owner. On the one hand they are clearly likely to undercharge, which they currently do, to appease public opinions. On the other hand if they start using tolls as a revenue source to fund other projects they have an incentive to overcharge. I think the former is more likely than the later, but the point is governments don't have any particular incentive to charge "reasonable prices." If they did have any such incentive we would already have tolls, but we don't because the political concerns trump the search for "reasonable prices."

And what is a "reasonable price" price anyways? As much as Torontonians moan about it, the 407 is well within global averages for tolls, especially considering its superior toll collection system, design and relatively recent construction. Some toll roads in Australia charge 4x the 407's rates. If you look at 407 ETR's SEDAR fillings, it's hardly like the company is totally gouging consumers. In 2k7 it had net income of 60m out of 4.5b of assets.
 
What's interesting is that Canada Pension Plan Investment Board and Teachers' are getting more into the infrastructure business... right now they are trying to take over a multi-billion dollar Australian toll road company. So maybe we'll have private toll roads that are actually owned by (most) taxpayers indirectly
 
At least it's teachers and not Starbucks, which as we all know is a front for Dr. Evil's evil empire.
 

Back
Top