News   Apr 20, 2026
 184     0 
News   Apr 20, 2026
 290     0 
News   Apr 17, 2026
 945     0 

Star: Jitters in the Streetscape Biz

A

Ashtangi

Guest
Toronto Star - January 28, 2007

www.thestar.com/News/article/175672

TheStar.com - News - Jitters in the streetscape biz
As deadline nears for bids on city's ambitious bin-and-bench vision, two key players bail, Jennifer Wells reports
January 28, 2007
Jennifer Wells

"My bosses like it when I make decisions that make money for the company," says a guy named Nick Arakgi. "They're funny that way."

Arakgi is vice-president and general manager for CBS Outdoor Canada, which means that his bosses currently hold the contract for the city's multitude of transit shelters, which means that Arakgi, at this very minute, is deciding whether to bid on Toronto's "street furniture" contract.

Does he not know that the deadline for proposals to remake the city's streetscape is Wednesday? As in this Wednesday?

Yes ,he does.

"I don't blame you for being surprised," says Arakgi.

But consider this: the city is looking to replace not only its transit shelters, but also those hideous garbage bins, as well as to add benches and newsracks and other street furniture elements. The objective: to beautify, as they say at City Hall, the "public realm." Total number of pieces: 25,640, making the Toronto contract one of the largest in the world. As Arakgi says, "This is no small undertaking."

When it issued its request for proposal in September, the city placed restrictions on the amount of advertising the furniture pieces may bear. Benches, for example, are to be ad free. Advertisements may not be clustered across pieces in close proximity. Of total advertising revenue, $6 million annually was to go to the city. That has since been waived. Under the current proposal, the city will get 27 per cent of gross revenue.

It is on this revenue model that companies such as CBS Outdoor are crunching and re-crunching numbers to test the economic viability of what will be a 20-year contract to install and – this is key – maintain all those furniture elements.

On Friday, one of the biggest players in the street furniture game sent a non-submission document to the city, its formal notification that it will not be making a bid. "It's a depressing situation," says Toulla Constantinou, chief executive of the North American arm of Cemusa. "We can't make any money. We won't make any money. We can't provide great design, install and maintain and generate enough revenue to pay for the investment."

Of all the potential players, Cemusa, which is in the throes of rolling out street furniture in New York City designed by the renowned Nicholas Grimshaw architectural group, had attained the highest profile around town. Of note: the party thrown at Thuet on King St. to announce an alliance with architect Jack Diamond, who was to design the full furniture line.

Diamond was quite looking forward to creating an iconic street furniture design – Toronto's own street furniture marque, if you will. "The sidewalks in Toronto are really our most important public spaces," he says. "The greatest visual cacophony is on the streets."

Our streets are relatively narrow, Diamond points out, and we do not have great avenues of trees. All the more reason to get this furniture business right. "If we develop a language of our street furniture," he says, "then people will understand the grammar." Diamond envisioned something elegant, cohesive, even delicate, a new signature that would say "Toronto" to residents and visitors alike.

Alas, it is not to be. "We're willing to take risks," says Cemusa's Constantinou. "That's what this business is all about. But if you know from day one your base case doesn't make sense, then how can you accept the risk?"

Also on Friday, François Nion, executive vice-president for JCDecaux North America, confirmed that it too has decided not to bid. "This is our core business," says Nion. "We invented (the street furniture) model. We developed it worldwide." Decaux has street furniture contracts in 45 cities. Paris. Shanghai. Chicago. Toronto is now off the list.

"The capital investment is tremendous," continues Nion, who puts the cost to the successful bidder at "well over" $100 million. "It just doesn't make any sense from a financial point of view ... The risks are way too high."

Consider, says Nion, the maintenance challenge. "On any given day, how often are you going to get a call about vandalism, graffiti. Someone drives a car into a shelter." The revenue drawn from advertising on select structures has to cover the maintenance of the entire suite of furniture, including dealing with such irritations as weeds, stickers, snow, ice, garbage and "scratchiti." The embedded labour costs are enormous. "You'll need an army," says Nion, "an entire division."

This week, Cemusa intends to commence lobbying City Hall to bust up the contract. The company proposes that the transit shelters form the core of the contract, with guaranteed minimum revenue, and that the city then use that revenue to purchase the additional pieces – the litter bins and such. "We have no complaints about the vision," says Constantinou. "I think where the city of Toronto staff has failed is that they failed to do their own quantitative analysis as to the cost and benefits of running the business for 20 years."

With two of the most prominent players out of the picture, the question arises: will the street furniture competition be robust enough to satisfy the city's objective, as it states in its Request For Proposals (RFP), to "dramatically improve and celebrate the quality of our public spaces through exceptional design"?

There is no need to drown our sorrows, at least not just yet.

Paul Seaman is the top man on the street furniture file for Clear Channel Outdoor Canada in Toronto. "I can't tell you how many spreadsheets I've worked on this every day since September," says Seaman. "It's all I've been living for the past six months."

Is he in? "Absolutely," is Seaman's refreshing response.

Seaman has heard the gathering industry talk. That the business case cannot be made. That only via increased opportunities for advertising revenue can the contract meet the design, quality and maintenance requirements the city demands.

Seaman doesn't buy it. "There's no question that one has to have a very sharp pencil on this project," he says. The sheer scope of the demands does "weigh heavily," not to mention the expectation of truly distinctive design. "We really had to start from scratch," he says. "It's like someone saying to you, `Build a car.'"

At Astral Media Inc. in Montreal, Alain Bergeron, vice-president of brand management, says he too will submit a bid by the Wednesday deadline.

Asked about the concerns that the proposed arrangement will not be viable in the long term, Bergeron declined to comment.

But he did add that Kramer Design Associates has been busily designing Astral's street furniture vision. "We have developed a complete line of products," says Jeremy Kramer. Not only those elements requested by the RFP, "but additional things we think Toronto should have." It was Kramer's group that designed the Astral Info-To-Go pillars that have been piloted around town. Perhaps more recognizably, it was Kramer Design that came up with those sleek glass-and-steel transit shelters that currently grace the streetscape, designed for a predecessor company to CBS Outdoor. The company has latterly built an international portfolio – projects in Las Vegas and Saudi Arabia to name two – while remaining rooted in Toronto.

That at least presents the prospect of a happy outcome to what Paul Seaman calls "the most ambitious street furniture undertaking in the world."

On that one point, there appears to be no argument.
 
Its a shame the big 2 are out of the picture now. They are the biggest in the world for a reason i was really looking forward to what they would have come up with. I hope the ideas that we end up seeing are decent ones or at least i hope that if the city doesn't like what it sees, it can go back and ease some of the revenue rules.
 
I don't understand why the city is asking for profit sharing in an endeavor it outsourced because _____? If the city furniture business can pay for itself in Toronto easily then why outsource? Surely the city could have installed all the street furniture itself and then contracted out the advertising space similar to what happens on TTC vehicles. Having street furniture providers dropping out and making the street furniture a choice between possibly the cheapest furniture providers rather than a choice between designs doesn't seem right to me.
 
I am happy that at least Astral/Kramer is in on the bid - I like the look of the work that Kramer has done so far. If they were to win, the bid might not include ripping out all the existing bus shelters, which to my mind a very wasteful idea.

enviro42
 
Agree about the current bus shelters. There's absolutely nothing wrong with the current design.
 
Spacing Wire has reported that Astral Media, Clear Channel and CBS has responded to the RFQ. Just to give you an idea...

Astral Media - responsible for the INFOTOGO information pillars; partnering with Kramer Design..

Clear Channel - the LED screen at Dundas Square and the media tower at Atrium on the Bay; partnering with Zeidler architects.

CBS - former Viacom, nuff said.

Personally, the list is pretty uninspiring, considering a good number of the proponents helped to erode the public realm to start off with.

AoD
 
From the Star:

The city's super-secret trash bins
Style by jury: The design gurus who will help shape Toronto’s sidewalks
Feb 01, 2007 04:30 AM
John Spears
Staff Reporter

The five experts selected as the design jury to make recommendations on the city’s street furniture project:

* Debbie Adams: Principal and creative director at Adams + Associates Design Consultants, and professor at Ontario College of Art and Design. Her work includes environmental design, brand identity and package design.

* Patrick Bollenberghe: The principal with MBTW Group is a landscape architect, urban designer and resort and community planner.

* Helen Kerr: President of Kerr & Company Inc., an industrial design firm. Her firm has created products ranging from contract furniture and housewares to more technical mass production objects.

* David Moos: Curator of contemporary art at the Art Gallery of Ontario.

* Michel Trocme: Architect and partner at Urban Strategies in Toronto. His work has focused on master planning, urban revitalization and waterfront planning.

The bids are in for a project to transform the look of Toronto's streets by redesigning every transit shelter, garbage bin and newspaper box on the sidewalk.

But you're not allowed to see them.

Three companies have bid for the massive job of placing more than 25,000 items of "street furniture" on Toronto sidewalks for the next 20 years.

They are: Astral Media, who supplied the information pillars at places including Nathan Phillips Square; a partnership headed by Clear Channel Outdoor; and CBS Outdoor Canada, formerly Viacom, which designed the existing bus shelters.

So what does all this stuff look like – the bins, bike racks, benches, bus shelters, even sidewalk washrooms?

That's not for the public to know yet.

Instead, a team of five design experts will review the submissions for the next two months and bring forward recommendations in March or April to council's executive committee.

A technical committee of city employees will also evaluate the bids to ensure they conform to rules outlined in the city's request for proposals.

For now, the city is following the policy adopted yesterday, when the bids closed and the contenders were formally announced in a city hall boardroom normally closed to the public. The bids were accompanied by large boxes – presumably models of the proposed designs – with the lids firmly closed.

Mayor David Miller said in an interview the public will have to wait for the experts.

"I think, while the evaluation process is going on ... staff have to do their evaluation under the rules of the (proposals)," he said in an interview. "But there will be opportunities for public comment once that's done."

The city hasn't outlined any plans for broader public consultation, or said when citizens will get a chance to see the designs.

Andrew Koropeski, a city official helping to lead the project, said the city wants to ensure nobody brings undue pressure on those doing the evaluation.

The winning bidder must supply a daunting list of items and maintain them for the life of the contract. They include 5,000 transit shelters, 12,500 garbage/recycling bins, 2,500 newspaper vending boxes, 1,000 bike racks and 20 public washrooms.

Industry experts estimate the items' cost at about $160 million. In return, the winning bidder will get to sell advertising on the transit shelters and garbage bins for 20 years, minus a revenue cut for the city.

The ad sales have brought objections from the Toronto Public Space Committee, which has campaigned against the way the project has been designed.

Selling ads on the street is "exactly the opposite" of the clean, beautiful city Torontonians have been led to expect, said public space campaigner Jonathan Goldsbie. He said the street furniture proposals should be put on display at locations around the city to get the widest possible public comment.

Just as interesting as the list of bidders is the list of those who are not. Firms that have provided street furniture to some of the world's biggest cities – including Paris and New York – did not submit proposals.

They include JCDecaux of France, which claims to be the world's top street furniture firm, Spanish-owned Cemusa Inc., which says it operates in 110 cities worldwide and Pattison Outdoor Advertising.

In an interview, Pattison president Randy Otto said the city's bid rules impose "onerous" obligations on the winner not only to provide the objects and keep them clean, but to keep the area around them tidy as well.

Miller said some bidders may have dropped out because the rules make the contract "a tough economic proposition," but the city still got bids from three reputable companies.

"The bidders that bid all I believe have some business in Toronto now," he noted. "The bidders that dropped out don't, and I think that shows that local knowledge helped.

" And I think that, although we took a tough approach, that that approach was right."

AoD
 
Why doesn't the design jury design it themselves?

Helen Kerr, for instance, is a fine industrial designer - surely with enough know-how to shepherd street furniture designs through the production process.

Cut out the middlemen , who generate advertising revenue off of the street furniture they are contracted to produce and remit a small portion thereof to the taxpayers, and give the city full control.
 
I think the current Viacom shelters are great although I'd like to see some warmth added to their design.

Grey and silver are nice, but a little green is a proven concept, specially in Toronto's white winters.

I look forward to the design, but I can't say I'm not worried about the two world leaders dropping out.
 
I was just looking through some of the websites of the competitors and I thinking there my be some hope. Going through astral media they actually do some nice work. On par with some work that JCDecaux and Cemusa.

I do love the new New York city furniture but I'd love to see something proposed that puts everything in the world to shame. Something innovative and special but one can only dream.
 
Two big city requested competitions are going on right now. This is one, the Nathan Philips request for proposals is another. I must admit that this in itself is a big accomplishment for our city.

However, it seems odd that these international competitions end up with only local firms submiting final proposals. :hat
 

Back
Top