Northern Light
Superstar
What’s your game here? MedRXiv isn’t a “respected journal”, it’s a pre-press server. The study hasn’t even been peer reviewed yet.
No game.
I've repeatedly said the data is subject to peer review.
Unlike you I actually read the scientific studies, ALL of them; and assess their citations, caveats and methodology and then draw conclusions as and when appropriate.
That’s not to say it’s not sound science, but don’t conflate things here.
I have conflated nothing.
I have accurately reported the study; linked the study, and fully disclosed its status and the need for peer review which I specifically called for; and which it would of course be subject to in any event.
That’s not what it says, according to one of the primary authors:
Please then, respect the authors’ wishes and don’t push this in an anti-vax way.
I'm double vaxxed which is clearly not anti-vax, duh!
Normally I keep all private conversations, private here, as people ought to be able to assume a measure of confidence.
But I think its important to note here that when you were looking to get a shot, I messaged you offering a link to an appt with my Family Health Team where I got mine.
I don't see how much more pro-vaxx one can be.
I'm tired of your trolling and your repeated efforts to misrepresent what I say, and the facts writ-large.
As a final note, I have only just above said there is no evidence that the vaccine is harmful.........so I'm in total agreement with the author there.
The discussion is not one of harm, but rather one of the demonstrable utility and evidence in support of same, in support of a mandate. (which is not an argument against vaxxing, but specifically about whether to exclude children, who are not vaccinated, likely due to a decision by their parent (so punishing the child for the parent's choice); when the evidence that it makes a material difference in outcome, in that age demographic is less than compelling.
As to effectiveness, I am reading the data as published; the author's supplemental statements are conjecture, or they would have been documented in the study. His conjecture may well be accurate, but there is no documentary evidence at this point. Perhaps that will be forthcoming.
Last edited: