News   Mar 31, 2023
 227     0 
News   Mar 30, 2023
 2.6K     1 
News   Mar 30, 2023
 382     0 

Premier Doug Ford's Ontario

W. K. Lis

Superstar
Member Bio
Joined
Dec 24, 2007
Messages
23,239
Reaction score
13,721
Location
Toronto, ON, CAN, Terra, Sol, Milky Way

Northern Light

Superstar
Member Bio
Joined
May 20, 2007
Messages
24,334
Reaction score
64,128
Location
Toronto/EY

From the point-of-view of it being overt election pandering; as well as an expensive hit to the treasury and there being far better uses for the money, I can't endorse the above........

Yet......

I'll confess this somewhat appeals to me; the issue in my mind is not the financial break to drivers, but rather the costs associated with administering a de facto tax; with a procedure that doesn't
really produce any other value (not tied to whether a car is road-worthy etc.); and where failure to pay said tax can also be a pretense for lots of police action, historically, at least some of which
has the tinge of racial prejudice.

The clear knocks on this move are the revenue hit, and, in effect, encouraging driving.

But those moves could be made-up for, and then some, by tolling provincial highways. Therein lies the problem, one doesn't suspect that's the plan here from Ford; and even were it so, that won't
be announced between now and election day.

That said, from the point-of-view of administrative streamlining; and reducing questionable use of police resources, I'd be inclined to support this; if only we can get those intelligent revenue off-sets into place.
Regrettably, that will probably be left to a successor regime.

Needless to say, I won't be supporting the current government at the polls, for this or any other reason.......however, my own thoughts on the merits aside, I expect it may well prove politically astute.
 

Jonny5

Senior Member
Member Bio
Joined
Nov 23, 2007
Messages
3,823
Reaction score
1,808

W. K. Lis

Superstar
Member Bio
Joined
Dec 24, 2007
Messages
23,239
Reaction score
13,721
Location
Toronto, ON, CAN, Terra, Sol, Milky Way

lenaitch

Senior Member
Member Bio
Joined
Sep 5, 2017
Messages
4,609
Reaction score
4,733
This trial balloon smacks of vote buying. I highly doubt the cost of the program is anywhere near 1Bn. Unless we have entered some kind of Star Trek post-money world, most regulated activities have fees to play. I suspect there would be a second shoe hovering to make up the money that we won't know about until after the election.
 
Last edited:

zang

Senior Member
Member Bio
Joined
Jun 6, 2013
Messages
2,262
Reaction score
2,916
This trial balloon smacks of vote buying. I highly doubt the cost of the program is anywhere near 1Bn. Unless we have entered some kind of Star Trek post-money world, most regulated have fees to play. I suspect there would be a second shoe hovering to make up the money that we won't know about until after the election.
Massive expansion of online gambling? Opening up liquor sales to third parties? Pay-for-play development fees for the greenbelt?
 

W. K. Lis

Superstar
Member Bio
Joined
Dec 24, 2007
Messages
23,239
Reaction score
13,721
Location
Toronto, ON, CAN, Terra, Sol, Milky Way

toonderly

Active Member
Member Bio
Joined
Mar 22, 2014
Messages
184
Reaction score
91
This trial balloon smacks of vote buying. I highly doubt the cost of the program is anywhere near 1Bn. Unless we have entered some kind of Star Trek post-money world, most regulated have fees to play. I suspect there would be a second shoe hovering to make up the money that we won't know about until after the election.
Does Doug ever employ any tactic other than demand that the federal government make up the shortfall?
 

afransen

Senior Member
Member Bio
Joined
Apr 22, 2007
Messages
6,347
Reaction score
6,280
From the point-of-view of it being overt election pandering; as well as an expensive hit to the treasury and there being far better uses for the money, I can't endorse the above........

Yet......

I'll confess this somewhat appeals to me; the issue in my mind is not the financial break to drivers, but rather the costs associated with administering a de facto tax; with a procedure that doesn't
really produce any other value (not tied to whether a car is road-worthy etc.); and where failure to pay said tax can also be a pretense for lots of police action, historically, at least some of which
has the tinge of racial prejudice.

The clear knocks on this move are the revenue hit, and, in effect, encouraging driving.

But those moves could be made-up for, and then some, by tolling provincial highways. Therein lies the problem, one doesn't suspect that's the plan here from Ford; and even were it so, that won't
be announced between now and election day.

That said, from the point-of-view of administrative streamlining; and reducing questionable use of police resources, I'd be inclined to support this; if only we can get those intelligent revenue off-sets into place.
Regrettably, that will probably be left to a successor regime.

Needless to say, I won't be supporting the current government at the polls, for this or any other reason.......however, my own thoughts on the merits aside, I expect it may well prove politically astute.
Kind of moving in the wrong direction if we expect a road tax to be implemented with the rise of EVs to compensate for declining fuel tax revenues.
 

Top