rbt
Senior Member
so far its just a bunch of NIMBYs yelling "non underground transit bad"
As they should be with Vaughan, Sheppard, Scarborough, and Eglinton West all getting far more tunnel than we want to pay to maintain.
so far its just a bunch of NIMBYs yelling "non underground transit bad"
so far its just a bunch of NIMBYs yelling "non underground transit bad"
She's continuing to push the myth that the DRL was somehow "shovel ready" even though it was years away from any shovels hitting the dirt.
She's continuing to push the myth that the DRL was somehow "shovel ready" even though it was years away from any shovels hitting the dirt.
As they should be with Vaughan, Sheppard, Scarborough, and Eglinton West all getting far more tunnel than we want to pay to maintain.
hey it takes use forever to build stuff, lets overbuild it because its our only chance".
In Montréal, they are planning their transit expansion using REM ( light metro, see link).
From link. Some of new lines will be surface or above grade, but some underground, where needed. The first sections are scheduled to be opened by 2021, latest 2023 for other sections. The trouble with Toronto is that every few years, we get new and different napkin plans, throwing out the old plans. Toronto should have been ADDING new transit plans to existing plans, not replacing them.
Lol the reason that things take forever to build is because we overbuild it!
I think theres this weird desire a lot of people have to see TR's on the DRL / OL there is really no reason that we need that, and it means saving cost doing all the complex trackwork to tie into the existing network.
Using smaller trains DOES NOT mean that its going to be full on day one. Its not like every possible rider who could get to their destination on the OL will switch over. People seem to forget that lines don't just tend to fill up immediately - travel patterns can take years to change. Theres also really no reason or data that shows that its going to be full in the medium term either. They are clearly aiming for around 30,000 ppdph starting capacity. That is quite significant.
Using smaller trains DOES NOT mean that its going to be full on day one. Its not like every possible rider who could get to their destination on the OL will switch over. People seem to forget that lines don't just tend to fill up immediately - travel patterns can take years to change. Theres also really no reason or data that shows that its going to be full in the medium term either. They are clearly aiming for around 30,000 ppdph starting capacity. That is quite significant.
There doesn't seem to be any data that shows anything at the moment, aside from some dubious comparisons from Metrolinx.
I'm not too concerned about whether or not it's full immediately, but a little further down the road (though I do think it will fill up faster than we expect). The approach taken does not leave much room for improvement in the long term, and potentially reduces future GO capacity expansion as well. And we haven't even addressed community concerns.
Investing in the Ontario Line is akin to buying a two-seater Mazda Miata over an equally priced four-seat Honda Civic when you know you got twin girls on the way. Sure, having a car is better than nothing, but it's still a dumbass, short-sighted decision that you'll inevitability regret.