News   Aug 23, 2024
 1.3K     0 
News   Aug 23, 2024
 2.2K     4 
News   Aug 23, 2024
 570     0 

NYC Port Authority Bus Terminal Tower Development

wyliepoon

Senior Member
Member Bio
Joined
Apr 22, 2007
Messages
2,011
Reaction score
3
New York Times

Link to article

Designs Unveiled for Tower Above Port Authority Bus Terminal


By DAVID W. DUNLAP
Published: July 25, 2008



Three suggested designs for an office tower that would rise above the Port Authority Bus Terminal on Eighth Avenue.


Easily the most striking is a 42-story constructivist assemblage by the London firm Rogers Stirk Harbour & Partners, which is also designing Tower 3 at the World Trade Center site. It takes the form of four discrete boxes stacked atop one another and bound together by open diagonal trusswork that echoes the bold X-shaped steel braces girdling the main terminal below.

In complete contrast, for its suavity and lucidity, is a proposal by the Manhattan firm Kohn Pedersen Fox Architects. The central element of this plan is a sheer, glass-clad, 48-story tower whose surface has an almost icy gleam. In this plan, the X braces would recede in importance behind a screen.

Somewhere between these two is the proposal by Pelli Clarke Pelli Architects of New Haven, a 47-story tower in a monolithic form, accentuated with curtain walls on the north and south sides in a kind of monumental wave pattern.

The 1.3-million-square-foot office tower is to be developed by a joint venture of Vornado Realty Trust and affiliates of the Lawrence Ruben Company, which would lease the air rights over the terminal from the Port Authority for 99 years.

The developers and the authority hope to choose a design within 30 to 60 days, said Michael B. Francois, the authority’s chief of real estate and development.

Should all go as planned, he said, construction may begin late next year or early in 2010. The tower would probably take about four years to build, longer than the usual high-rise because of the complexities of building over an operating bus terminal.

Whether there would be tenant demand for such a building is much harder to say.

At its monthly meeting on Thursday, the authority board granted two six-month extensions of the period during which it is negotiating exclusively with the Vornado-Ruben development team, which is known formally as 20 X Square Associates.

The rental terms are already set. There would be a fixed rent for the 99-year period totaling $344.5 million (or $265 a square foot). The authority would also receive a percentage of the net operating income. That amount could vary, but Mr. Francois said the authority currently estimated it at $125 a square foot, for a total of $162.5 million.

That would be more than $500 million in all.

“What is critical here is the need for this agency to monetize the assets it has,†said Anthony R. Coscia, chairman of the authority, just before the extensions were granted unanimously. He also said the deal would “lead to better commutes for 200,000 daily bus passengers.â€

As part of the overall redevelopment project, the authority would build 18 new bus gates and upgrade existing gates, allowing as many as 70 more buses an hour to be accommodated during peak commuting periods, and would build new escalators to serve the gates.

port.large.jpg


Left, Pelli Clarke Pelli Architects; Rogers Stirk Harbour & Partners; Kohn Pedersen Fox Architects
 
it certainly does speak of the time in which it was built. but we all know that the space is very valuable. there's no way that the aesthetic of the existing terminal would be kept if a new tower was built. Rogers Stirk Harbour & Partners seems to me like the only proposal to keep that sort of theme going throughout the tower with that steel brace.
 
All the proposals seems a bit disappointing. Rogers' hasn't been articulated enough - but it could potentially be the most interesting one of it all.

smucky:

I thought the cross bracing can be carried through in a different way on the tower portion - acting as the support structure for some sort of double skin facade.

AoD
 
Yikes, I think I prefer it the way it is...

350px-Port-authority-terminal.jpg


It really speaks to a time, unlike the above tacky things.

Although even it's been compromised: i.e. the trussing-up of the originally naked X-bracing on behalf of signage that never came (other than that corner thing). (IOW the Rogers scheme is a de facto "restoration".)

Interesting, too, how only the KPF rendering really acknowledges the all-too-overlooked presence next door of Raymond Hood's great McGraw-Hill building...
 
This is making me think that our bus terminal could use something like this. I didn't realize how far it extended until recently - it goes a full two blocks West of Bay Street. And if I'm not mistaken, there are a couple of surface parking lots adjacent to it. They could combine the existing land it takes up with these lots for a large development. It's within a 5-6 minute walk of Dundas and St. Patrick subway stations, and is accessible from Dundas without going outside, which is nice in the winter. The Bay/Dundas area is pretty underdeveloped considering it's pretty much the geographic centre of downtown.
 
All the proposals seems a bit disappointing. Rogers' hasn't been articulated enough - but it could potentially be the most interesting one of it all.

I agree! I saw it but couldn't quite put my disappointment into words. I agree that the Rogers & Co. proposal has the potential be the best one, particularly since NY doesn't really have a large, de-con Rogers building like Lloyds in London or Pompidou in Paris.

Good point adma, I have always had a soft spot for that beautiful piece of Streamline-moderne architecture.
 

Back
Top