News   Nov 15, 2019
 173     0 
News   Nov 15, 2019
 454     0 
News   Nov 15, 2019
 664     1 

Metrolinx: Finch West LRT

syn

Senior Member
Member Bio
Joined
Apr 26, 2007
Messages
4,270
Reaction score
1,736
I don't know about you guys, but I'm salivating just thinking about the inevitable redevelopment and urbanization of Albion Mall that this lrt will bring. It's such a huge lot and it's wasted on parking lots and grass atm.
This project will be a major boon to riders and the area.
 

yoshirocks702

New Member
Member Bio
Joined
Sep 17, 2016
Messages
97
Reaction score
134

mikeydale007

New Member
Member Bio
Joined
Aug 19, 2018
Messages
32
Reaction score
57
Theres also that huge 20+ acre plot NE beside Albion.
I've explored/trespassed on that land. It's pretty cool. The best part is the long abandoned road that leads to it from the Islington/Finch intersection. I recommend any urban explorers check it out before it's redeveloped. Read about it here: https://hikingthegta.com/2016/10/27/country-hospital-for-sick-children/
The property has a cool history.
 

W. K. Lis

Superstar
Member Bio
Joined
Dec 24, 2007
Messages
15,409
Reaction score
4,335
Location
Toronto, ON, CAN, Terra, Sol, Milky Way
I've explored/trespassed on that land. It's pretty cool. The best part is the long abandoned road that leads to it from the Islington/Finch intersection. I recommend any urban explorers check it out before it's redeveloped. Read about it here: https://hikingthegta.com/2016/10/27/country-hospital-for-sick-children/
The property has a cool history.
It's too bad that the current practise of amalgamating, centralizing, and closing of small neighbourhood hospitals, that a new hospital or other health care centre couldn't be built there. We end up having to use the car (or public transit), instead of walking to a health care centre in a neighbourhood, and adding minutes or more likely hours for a medical checkup at a hospital.
 

Reecemartin

Senior Member
Member Bio
Joined
Feb 14, 2016
Messages
1,500
Reaction score
1,033
I'm curious to see how this largely at grade LRT performs, might be a validator for those mentioning concepts of truly LRT-ifying King, St.Clair, Spadina and Harbourfront. That being said I still do find it off that we don't have next vehicle indicators at all the stops especially on Spadina.

If the project is successful I think it will be a great model to spur on future LRT's on wide streets with decent density such as Steeles and Highway 7. It also does well in connecting with the subway underground.
 

Reecemartin

Senior Member
Member Bio
Joined
Feb 14, 2016
Messages
1,500
Reaction score
1,033
Is there a reason for the green arrows on the track? The eglinton concepts dont have this.
View attachment 208139

I really think some of these glass centre walls would be a great fit for one of thenew Metrolinx Wayfinding points like at Pearson.
 

Edward Skira

http://skyrisecities.com
Staff member
Member Bio
Joined
Apr 22, 2007
Messages
13,163
Reaction score
10,271
Location
Toronto
Trees along Finch west of Keele have either been surrounded with protective fencing or cut down so early work has started.

And then there's this:

IMG_8925.JPG
IMG_8924.JPG
IMG_8922.JPG
IMG_8921.JPG
IMG_8920.JPG
 

BurlOak

Senior Member
Member Bio
Joined
Dec 7, 2011
Messages
5,792
Reaction score
1,481
The option was either this rapid bridge replacement (RBR), or a whole new bridge.
The RBR reuses the existing abutments and piers. The new bridge is built off to the side, and then with a weekend closure of the 400, the old bridge is removed and the new one brought into place. (Similar to what was first done in Ottawa: https://www.canadianconsultingengineer.com/features/rapid-replacement-of-highway-417-island-park-drive-overpass/.
A new bridge would have been built in stages and had all new components. The span would have been a bit longer to accommodate additional lanes for the LRT and still maintain car lanes. Prefab components could have been used to speed construction, but it would likely have taken 2 years. Lanes would have been shifted on 400, but basically all kept open.
I think the first option had the lower initial cost and the 2nd had a lower life cycle cost. The City said there was no benefit to having additional lanes under 400. Likely in 50 years when this bridge need replacement we will regret the decision to not build a fully new bridge. For the next 50 years, we will regret the decision as going under the Finch Bridge will become a larger bottleneck than it is now.
 

cplchanb

Senior Member
Member Bio
Joined
Apr 15, 2010
Messages
1,767
Reaction score
756
The option was either this rapid bridge replacement (RBR), or a whole new bridge.
The RBR reuses the existing abutments and piers. The new bridge is built off to the side, and then with a weekend closure of the 400, the old bridge is removed and the new one brought into place. (Similar to what was first done in Ottawa: https://www.canadianconsultingengineer.com/features/rapid-replacement-of-highway-417-island-park-drive-overpass/.
A new bridge would have been built in stages and had all new components. The span would have been a bit longer to accommodate additional lanes for the LRT and still maintain car lanes. Prefab components could have been used to speed construction, but it would likely have taken 2 years. Lanes would have been shifted on 400, but basically all kept open.
I think the first option had the lower initial cost and the 2nd had a lower life cycle cost. The City said there was no benefit to having additional lanes under 400. Likely in 50 years when this bridge need replacement we will regret the decision to not build a fully new bridge. For the next 50 years, we will regret the decision as going under the Finch Bridge will become a larger bottleneck than it is now.
well...you know public works....they rarely consider anything past their elected mandate...
 

tstormers

Active Member
Member Bio
Joined
Dec 5, 2014
Messages
285
Reaction score
1,026
The option was either this rapid bridge replacement (RBR), or a whole new bridge.
The RBR reuses the existing abutments and piers. The new bridge is built off to the side, and then with a weekend closure of the 400, the old bridge is removed and the new one brought into place. (Similar to what was first done in Ottawa: https://www.canadianconsultingengineer.com/features/rapid-replacement-of-highway-417-island-park-drive-overpass/.
A new bridge would have been built in stages and had all new components. The span would have been a bit longer to accommodate additional lanes for the LRT and still maintain car lanes. Prefab components could have been used to speed construction, but it would likely have taken 2 years. Lanes would have been shifted on 400, but basically all kept open.
I think the first option had the lower initial cost and the 2nd had a lower life cycle cost. The City said there was no benefit to having additional lanes under 400. Likely in 50 years when this bridge need replacement we will regret the decision to not build a fully new bridge. For the next 50 years, we will regret the decision as going under the Finch Bridge will become a larger bottleneck than it is now.
According to Metrolinx they are going with the RBR, closing the 400 north lanes One weekend and the South Lanes another weekend to replace the two sections.
 

yoshirocks702

New Member
Member Bio
Joined
Sep 17, 2016
Messages
97
Reaction score
134
According to the rendering there will be 3 lanes of traffic each way plus the lrt lanes plus an on ramp and a side walk so I'm guessing there is enough room under the existing bridge so they don't have to make it wider. Which would make sense why they are doing the RBR

400 finch west lrt.JPG
 

Top