News   Apr 17, 2024
 1.5K     0 
News   Apr 17, 2024
 368     0 
News   Apr 17, 2024
 2.1K     1 

King Street (Streetcar Transit Priority)

Maybe the problem is the solution. It is so counter-intuitive to not allow cars to travel straight through.
Perhaps it would have been better to just ban left turns - which is the real thing that slows streetcars.
 
Maybe the problem is the solution. It is so counter-intuitive to not allow cars to travel straight through.
Perhaps it would have been better to just ban left turns - which is the real thing that slows streetcars.
They have banned left turns at most intersections as part of it. They were banned at many previously.

What used to cause delays on King, was simply that there were too many cars period. Most going straight. While a few cars still break the rules, most stay away completely. Allowing cars to go straight, would increase the number of cars on King significantly.
 
I do not think anyone says there could not (should not) be more enforcement but from my experience transit on King is MUCH more reliable and if streetcars get stuck on King it is much more often because cross-streets are blocked (another enforcement issue!). We should demand better enforcement but if you expect to NEVER see cars on King you will be out of luck. As with fare inspections, you cannot and need not inspect everyone - you just need to have enough enforcement so that people think they MAY be inspected and change their behaviour.


It’s somewhat better. Maybe the issue is success to me and you are just different. Enforcement really isn’t that difficult. Let’s do something right instead of just good enough.
 
King street needs cameras like red light cameras now that its out of pilot.

Go straight through, get your license plate pic taken, $100 fine in the mail.

Im against speed cameras as they are generally just a revenue generator, but this is different, this is illegally driving through an intersection into an area thats banned.

And the funds should go towards that 60 streetcar order :)
King St needs to get rid of cars :p
 
If all those towers along King getting built, how is there any room for cars? Impossible in my opinion. Also people I know living in that area are not owning cars any more - even with earning a solid six digit income!
 
If all those towers along King getting built, how is there any room for cars? Impossible in my opinion. Also people I know living in that area are not owning cars any more - even with earning a solid six digit income!

There is a provision on all condos downtown to create a portion of underground parking for non residents. Day parking in other words.

The MEC on Queen, while not a condo, was required to have 4 stories of underground Green P.
 
King St needs to get rid of cars :p

We have to overcome the automobile gods and their political disciples.

7 Cities That Are Starting To Go Car-Free
Urban planners are finally recognizing that streets should be designed for people, not careening hunks of deadly metal.

After over a hundred years of living with cars, some cities are slowly starting to realize that the automobile doesn’t make a lot of sense in the urban context. It isn’t just the smog or the traffic deaths; in a city, cars aren’t even a convenient way to get around.
Traffic in London today moves slower than an average cyclist (or a horse-drawn carriage). Commuters in L.A. spend 90 hours a year stuck in traffic. A U.K. study found that drivers spend 106 days of their lives looking for parking spots.
Now a growing number of cities are getting rid of cars in certain neighborhoods through fines, better design, new apps, and, in the case of Milan, even paying commuters to leave their car parked at home and take the train instead.
Unsurprisingly, the changes are happening fastest in European capitals that were designed hundreds or thousands of years before cars were ever built. In sprawling U.S. suburbs that were designed for driving, the path to eliminating cars is obviously more challenging. (And a few car-loving cities, like Sydney, Australia, are going in the other direction, and taking away pedestrian space on some downtown streets so there’s more room for cars).
Here are a handful of the leaders moving toward car-free neighborhoods.
Madrid
3040634-inline-1-madrid.jpg

Flickr user Mispahn
Madrid has already banned most traffic from certain city streets, and this month, the car-free zone will expand even further. Stretching over more than a square mile, the area will still allow neighborhood its own residents to drive, but anyone else who enters will be hit with a fine over $100. It’s one step in a larger plan to completely pedestrianize central Madrid in the next five years. Twenty-four of the city’s busiest streets will be redesigned for walking, not driving. Before the street layouts change, cars will also be discouraged in another way: Now the dirtiest, most polluting cars in the city have to pay have to pay more to park.
Paris
3040634-inline-2-paris.jpg

Flickr user Luke Ma
Last year, when smog levels spiked in Paris, the city briefly banned cars with even-numbered plates. Pollution dropped as much as 30% in some areas, and now the city plans to start permanently discouraging cars. In the city center, people who don’t live in local neighborhoods won’t be able to drive in on weekends, and that rule could soon roll out to the whole week.
By 2020, the mayor plans to double the number of bike lanes in the city, ban diesel cars, and limit certain high-traffic streets to electric cars and other ultra-low-emission vehicles. The number of drivers in the city is already starting to drop. In 2001, 40% of Parisians didn’t own a car; now that number is 60%.
Chengdu
3040634-inline-3-chengdu.jpg

Adrian Smith + Gordon Gill Architecture
A new satellite city planned in Southwest China could serve as a model for a modern suburb: Instead of a layout that makes it necessary to drive, the streets are designed so any location can be reached by 15 minutes on foot.
The plans, designed by Chicago-based architects Adrian Smith and Gordon Gill, don’t call for completely banning cars, but only half of the road area will allow motorized vehicles. The city will also connect to the larger, nearby city of Chengdu with public transit. Out of an expected population of 80,000 people, most will be able to walk to work in local neighborhoods. The project was originally planned for completion in 2020, but that may be delayed–it’s currently on hold because of zoning issues.
Hamburg
3040634-inline-4-hamburg.jpg

Flickr user Peter Gutierrez
Though Hamburg isn’t planning to ban cars from its city center (as has been misreported elsewhere), the city is making it easier and easier not to drive. A new “green network,” which will be completed in the next 15 to 20 years, will connect parks across the city, making it possible to bike or walk anywhere. The network will cover 40% of the city’s space. The city is also covering up sections of the infamously crowded A7 autobahn with parks–so neighborhoods that were once hard to cross on foot will soon be more inviting.
Helsinki
3040634-inline-5-helsinki.jpg

City of Helsinki
Helsinki expects a flood of new residents over the next few decades, but the more people come, the fewer cars will be allowed on city streets. In a new plan, the city lays out a design that will transform car-dependent suburbs into dense, walkable communities linked to the city center by fast-moving public transit. The city is also building new mobility-on-demand services to streamline life without a car. A new app in testing now lets citizens instantly call up a shared bike, car, or taxi, or find the nearest bus or train. In a decade, the city hopes to make it completely unnecessary to own a car.
Milan
3040634-inline-6-milan.jpg

Flickr user Chris Yunker
The smoggy city of Milan is testing a new way to keep cars out of the city center: If commuters leave their vehicles at home, they’ll get free public transit vouchers. An Internet-connected box on the dashboard keeps track of a car’s location, so no one can cheat and drive to work. Each day someone’s car stays at home, the city sends a voucher with the same value as a ticket on the bus or train.
Copenhagen
3040634-inline-7-copenhagen.jpg

Flickr user Daniel
Forty years ago, traffic was as bad in Copenhagen as any other large city. Now, over half of the city’s population bikes to work every day–nine times more bike commuters than in Portland, Oregon, the city with the most bike commuters in the U.S.
Copenhagen started introducing pedestrian zones in the 1960s in the city center, and car-free zones slowly spread over the next few decades. The city now has over 200 miles of bike lanes, with new bike superhighways under development to reach surrounding suburbs. The city has one of the lowest rates of car ownership in Europe.
None of these cities are planning–yet–to go completely car-free. And it’s possible that may never happen; it’s likely that future cities will have at least a small fleet of self-driving electric cars on hand that can eliminate some of the current challenges around parking, congestion and pollution. But it’s also clear that urban planners are finally recognizing that streets should be designed for people, not cars.
 
So much for red LED signs showing no left turn or straight through to traffic.

Saw the ones place at Spadina and drivers still drove through the intersection anyway. One driver was confused to the point he looked like he was going to make a u-turn to a point a car drove around him onto Spadina. In the end, continue east on King illegal.

Need to have the signs place on the west side for eastbound traffic and sure drivers will disobey the signs like they do today.
 
So much for red LED signs showing no left turn or straight through to traffic.

Saw the ones place at Spadina and drivers still drove through the intersection anyway. One driver was confused to the point he looked like he was going to make a u-turn to a point a car drove around him onto Spadina. In the end, continue east on King illegal.

Need to have the signs place on the west side for eastbound traffic and sure drivers will disobey the signs like they do today.
The same thing is happening at the Jarvis and Church intersections. I think the LED signs aren't visible enough in direct sunlight, and they're probably too far away from the actual signals to be noticed by drivers (I'm being generous here).
 
So much for red LED signs showing no left turn or straight through to traffic.

Saw the ones place at Spadina and drivers still drove through the intersection anyway. One driver was confused to the point he looked like he was going to make a u-turn to a point a car drove around him onto Spadina. In the end, continue east on King illegal.

Need to have the signs place on the west side for eastbound traffic and sure drivers will disobey the signs like they do today.
Again, if a bunch people are having this issue and more continue to experience it as well, then the problem isn't the driver but the rules/system.
 
^ I don't completely dismiss it out of hand, but LEDs have consistently shown (bad pun) to be far more visible than their incandescent predecessors, by quite an amount. I'm absolutely no fan of LEDs for ambience, (I'm an electronic tech, worked with them for almost half a century), but for catching your attention? They work exquisitely.

What's failing is drivers wanting to see them or not. They don't have a problem seeing LEDs when they want to...Unless there's a consistent and probable consequence to disobeying traffic signals, they will continue to do so, and in increasing numbers.

All you have to do is watch how many of them speed past opening streetcar doors of late. Or even fully opened ones. I see it time and again every ride on a streetcar.
 
The same thing is happening at the Jarvis and Church intersections. I think the LED signs aren't visible enough in direct sunlight, and they're probably too far away from the actual signals to be noticed by drivers (I'm being generous here).

Be generous all you want, all your doing is worshipping the aautomobile religion
 

Back
Top