News   Nov 15, 2019
 2.6K     9 
News   Nov 15, 2019
 1K     0 
News   Nov 15, 2019
 1.4K     2 

Ion Light Rail (Kitchener-Waterloo) & King/Victoria Transit Terminal

Streety McCarface

Senior Member
Member Bio
Joined
Dec 6, 2017
Messages
1,621
Reaction score
1,318
almost 20km? The line is like 16km by my measurement.
I'm going by the region's quoted length (19 km), the distance they used for all the design papers back when the system was being proposed. I checked the distances as well, and the route itself is about 16 km, but when you include the split sections, it increases to 19 km.

Screen Shot 2019-07-11 at 9.47.48 AM.png
 

Streety McCarface

Senior Member
Member Bio
Joined
Dec 6, 2017
Messages
1,621
Reaction score
1,318

ridership update:

During the paid period, average daily ridership is 14K PPD, with an additional 8-10K PPD across the entire system. As expected, ridership dropped by less than 50%.
 

micheal_can

Senior Member
Member Bio
Joined
Dec 24, 2016
Messages
1,445
Reaction score
742

Streety McCarface

Senior Member
Member Bio
Joined
Dec 6, 2017
Messages
1,621
Reaction score
1,318
What is the as-built PPD?
PPD can range from anything, as passengers can get on and off between stops, but assuming that the PPD would be passengers travelling from Conestoga to Fairview,
With the current rolling stock, the maximum would be, assuming the following maximum loads for the Flexity:
130 passengers (Beyond this, a vehicle is considered overcrowded) — 39,000 PPD
170 passengers (Crush Loading) — 51,000 PPD
190 passengers (No room left) — 57,000 PPD

If you're referring to Passengers Per Hour Per Direction (which I think you are), those values would be:
130 passengers/flexity — 975 PPHPD
170 passengers/flexity — 1,275 PPHPD
190 passengers/flexity — 1,425 PPHPD

If we increase frequencies to every 5 minutes and double the length of the trains, those numbers increase to:
130 passengers/flexity — 3,120 PPHPD
170 passengers/flexity — 4,080 PPHPD
190 passengers/flexity — 4,560 PPHPD
250 passengers/flexity — 6,000 PPHPD
 

AndreWW

New Member
Member Bio
Joined
Apr 8, 2019
Messages
10
Reaction score
5
Location
Waterloo/Wellington
I spotted some pedestrian "encouragement" at Northfield station today. The wall on the platform seemed to mostly be respected, but the cones were (clearly) completely ineffective. I'm curious to see what the permanent solution will be here and at the other stations with poor pedestrian accessibility.
196455
20190726_172938.jpg
 
Last edited:

micheal_can

Senior Member
Member Bio
Joined
Dec 24, 2016
Messages
1,445
Reaction score
742
I spotted some pedestrian "encouragement" at Northfield station today. The wall on the platform seemed to mostly be respected, but the cones were (clearly) completely ineffective. I'm curious to see what the permanent solution will be here and at the other stations with poor pedestrian accessibility.
View attachment 196455 View attachment 196456
A fence?
 

crs1026

Senior Member
Member Bio
Joined
Oct 16, 2014
Messages
5,576
Reaction score
6,122
^When I took my first ride, I was surprised at how little deterrence there was to crossing the road to platforms. Here’s an example - I had no idea that just walking across was discouraged, until I had done so and saw the ‘Emergency Exit’ sign.
If you compare to say the TTC St Clair stop platforms , they are a lot harder to get into than iOn.

- Paul

5964A2B2-FF6F-4FCC-9AA1-3F473196A8DF.jpeg
F371CFFF-B7DD-4234-A08D-5FE75E00FD46.jpeg
 

kEiThZ

Senior Member
Member Bio
Joined
Jul 31, 2008
Messages
8,955
Reaction score
2,116
I wouldn't really call every 10 minutes "poor".
I would. And did. I don't get how a rapid transit trunk line is allowed to have frequency that poor. Imagine you just miss the train, and then just miss your bus connection on the other end. 20 mins added to your trip. Routes like these should be at least 3-5 mins at peak, and 5-7 mins off-peak.
 

Top