gotransitboyhere
Active Member
Why would they keep the cab and most of its features
It probably would’ve been too difficult to remove the entire cab and strip all the controls and cab features away, I also believe they retained them incase there was some flaw that required the CEMs to be taken out of service, and allow them to temporarily be put back into leading service.Why would they keep the cab and most of its features
Honestly, why???I wish bad on the CEM cab cars because I want to see 215-250 cab cars leading.
Probably because he's a random rail fan who doesn't like them for some reason. I have people who love the T1's and hate the TR's or think we should keep the SRT cars running commenting stuff like that on my YouTube channel all of the time.Honestly, why???
Why would they keep the cab and most of its features
Honestly I think GO should go with battery powered locomotives instead. they look more train like than these rapid light rail looking things.
How would you define ''look more train like''? And why battery locomotives specifically?Honestly I think GO should go with battery powered locomotives instead. they look more train like than these rapid light rail looking things.
battery locomotives don't necessarily need overhead lines or the 3rd rail to work, and in case of a blackout these locomotives will still run unlike (pure electric locomotives). also they don't in danger the wildlife like birds for example if they were to land on a power line they would die.How would you define ''look more train like''? And why battery locomotives specifically?
Considering most of Europe and the east coast of the United States runs fine, I don’t think GO will need to tap into a relatively new type of locomotive technology.battery locomotives do necessarily need overhead lines or the 3rd rail to work, and in case of blackout these locomotives will still run unlike (pure electric locomotives). also they don't in danger the wildlife like birds for example if they were to land on a power line they would die.