News   Aug 23, 2024
 1.2K     0 
News   Aug 23, 2024
 2K     4 
News   Aug 23, 2024
 558     0 

GO ends 40-year CN deal

E

Ed007Toronto

Guest
www.thestar.com/News/article/179609

Feb 08, 2007 12:30 PM
Curtis Rush
Staff Reporter
With its rail performance under fire, GO Transit is making moves to sever its 40-year relationship with the company that runs most of its commuter trains.
CN Rail spokesperson Mark Hallman said today that GO Transit will put to tender the contract for rail crews when the current agreement expires this year. CN will not bid on a new deal, he said. CN currently provides crews for six of the seven GO lines, with CP providing crews for the Milton line.

GO wants an agreement that will allow it to penalize a company for late performance and the current deal contains no such clauses, according to Hallman.

GO says CN is the leading cause of problems with on-time performance, blaming CN for about one-third of the late trains in November and December.

CN has been providing crews since GO was established in 1967.

"It's their prerogative to make that call," Hallman said of GO’s decision to tender the contract. "This is a particular path that GO wanted to pursue and it's within their purview to do it."

He wouldn't say why CN would not be bidding on a new contract.

GO Transit turned down repeated requests for an interview with CEO Gary McNeil. Neither he nor GO chair Peter Smith returned messages.

Veolia Transportation, based in London, England, and Quebec's Bombardier have both said they are interested in running trains for GO. Veolia currently operates York Region's Viva buses.

CN will still run the track system on which most GO trains operate.

CN's Hallman said there would unlikely be any jobs lost because the CN employees would be reassigned to CN's freight operations.

Meanwhile, he says CN has dedicated two employees to troubleshoot several sections of the Lakeshore line, which was hit with many delays in January.

For November and December, GO trains were on-time in November 89 per cent of the time and 88 per cent of the time in December. Those figures are up slightly from October, when trains were on time only 82 per cent of the time, the worst-performing month in two years.

GO Transit's objective is to be in the low to mid-90s for percentage on-time performance.

GO Transit blamed CN for 35 per cent of the delays in November. It also blamed Bombardier, which maintains GO's locomotives, for another 13 per cent of the problems. GO itself took the blame for 22 per cent of the delays in November.

In December, GO Transit blamed CN for 33 per cent of the delays, Bombardier for 19 per cent, while taking responsibility for 21 per cent of the problems due to work programs. Problems that were created when CN reduced engineering crews on the Lakeshore line were cited as causing delays during Dec. 30 and Dec. 31.

Up to 16 per cent of the delays in December were attributed to vandalism, weather, crossing incidents and trespassing.

For GO, the Richmond Hill and Bradford lines continue to be the worst performing. The Richmond Hill line was the worst performer in November, being on-time only 75 per cent of the time. Bradford line was the worst performer in December, with its trains reporting only a 76 per cent on-time rate.

In both months, the Lakeshore east was the top performer, with 93 per cent on-time performance in November and 92 per cent in December.
 
Fantastic Move!!!!!!!!!

As an almost daily rider of the Milton/Lakeshore Line, I'm always on time using Milton, however it has been a hit and miss with Lakeshore over the few months.

Louroz
 
Obviously CN was at fault when it came to crew shortages and labour disruptions (this being the most acute on the Lakeshore Line), but a lot of it may still be CN's fault (signal issues, track issues, freights) but there will be little GO can do about that, unless they expropriate all the railways they use and reverse the running rights scenerio, where GO transit can tell the freight trains to hold for its trains, rather than the other way around. And GO needs better communications, management, operations and public relations. Not to mention new locos and better service.

GO Transit won't be off the hook with this move. It will still need major management and operational changes, which I will not hold my breath for.
 
Don't hold your breath indeed; there is almost no chance of expropriating rail lines, which would be hugely expensive. The issue of who provides crews is relatively minor. Other issues will still remain, including their ongoing problems of frozen switches, and the fact that CN and CP, who own most of the lines, consider freight to be their primary business.
 
Quote: Obviously CN was at fault when it came to crew shortages and labour disruptions (this being the most acute on the Lakeshore Line), but a lot of it may still be CN's fault (signal issues, track issues, freights) but there will be little GO can do about that, unless they expropriate all the railways they use and reverse the running rights scenerio, where GO transit can tell the freight trains to hold for its trains, rather than the other way around.

A good idea, but CN's customers are ridiculously fussy and want their loads delivered exactly on time. I can understand why CN is reluctant to have their freights wait for GO trains.
 
The province should expropriate the railways in the GTA and treat them like 400 series highways (essentially expand Toronto Terminal Railways - aka Union Stn). Get a respected private sector railway operator to maintain the track and tell GO *AND* CN/CP/VIA where and when to run.

Being an owner and an operator is being poacher and gamekeeper.
 

Back
Top