News   Jan 09, 2025
 357     0 
News   Jan 09, 2025
 285     0 
News   Jan 09, 2025
 539     0 

Globe: Fixing Toronto: Urban Design Ideas

AlvinofDiaspar

Moderator
Member Bio
Joined
Apr 22, 2007
Messages
33,584
Reaction score
29,721
Location
Toronto
Series from the Globe and Mail, Toronto Section:

FIXING TORONTO: URBAN DESIGN IDEAS
Street smarts
Toronto is getting used to splashy buildings, but our streetscape could use a little imagination too. In this six-part series, we ask some of the city's most creative designers to improve our burg - on the cheap

PATRICIA CHISHOLM

Special to The Globe and Mail

It's often essential to leave your home in order to see it clearly.

After an extended sojourn in another, much-better-dressed city, I began to bemoan the visual wretchedness of the place where I was born and raised. Yes, the angles about to sprout from the Royal Ontario Museum and Will Alsop's provocative box on stilts for the Ontario College of Art & Design were all very well, but what of the rest of the city? Why not just flatten all that concrete-challenged public space in between and start over?

But after conversations with designers and other disenchanted residents, it became clear that there are plenty of ways we can improve Toronto's urban fabric quickly and cheaply. The purpose of the six-part series that begins today is to show, through the eyes of some of Toronto's most committed and imaginative designers and architects, what could be - that is, if we had the will and courage to reimagine Toronto as a place where visual harmony and a sense of surprise are commonplace; a place where the shabby and the unimaginative are not allowed to spread unchecked.

The beauty of this approach, which strikes me as quintessentially Canadian, is that it's based on using what we have.

Is there a rump end of a street adjacent to the entertainment district, used for turning streetcars and impossible to plant trees on because of all the services running under its pavement? Landscape architects Janet Rosenberg +

Associates would turn it into a pedestrian playground (see above), where tree-like umbrellas allow dappled light to filter over sidewalks adorned with bands of green.

Is University Avenue, our only grand thoroughfare, a disappointing canyon of grey boxes in the core of the city, bisected by six lanes of traffic?

Reduce the lanes, turn the centre island into a pedestrian park and let shops and cafés root along the building façades as they do on any self-respecting grand boulevard. That's the suggestion of Denegri Bessai Studio, which comprises two Canadian architects who started their careers in Barcelona during that city's famous 15-year architectural makeover.

Architect Tom Bessai, 39, whose ideas helped to inspire this series, explains that many of the techniques used so successfully there - such as contemporary lighting, elegant green spaces and inventive paving - can have a remarkable "makeover" effect.

As the submissions roll out over the next month, there will be rewarding viewing and discussion for anyone interested in the visually appealing city that Toronto could be, one where it's easy to direct out-of-towners to numerous public spaces full of delight, rather than the head-scratching chore it is now. The designers who graciously donated their time to this project range from the world-famous, to Canadian icons, to emerging architects not yet 40.

Some, such as Will Alsop of SMC Alsop, Bruce Kuwabara of KPMB, and Ms. Rosenberg, deserve special thanks for illuminating the potential in this city - and also, perhaps, for demanding the elegant, architecturally grown-up city its residents are entitled to.

Mr. Kuwabara sees vast changes in Toronto in only seven years at places such as the University of Toronto and OCAD, changes that are as remarkable for a long-time student of the city's planning and design as they are for those from away. "I see architectural projects that are at a level that I never imagined would be here," he says.

Today, Mr. Kuwabara is optimistic about the city, which he says "has the warts and pimples of a teenage city but ... a lot of potential."

Mr. Alsop, who is based in London but has opened a small office in Toronto since designing the Sharp Centre for Design at OCAD, sees the same kind of shift in the city. For Mr. Alsop, questions of design don't revolve around one building or space. "It's all one project," he says. "And that project - it sounds absurd - is to make life better."

An essential ingredient for that sort of betterment, Mr.

Alsop says, is a willingness to face up to the current state of affairs. "Once you've admitted it," he says, "then you can do something."
_______________________________________________

FIXING TORONTO: PLANT ARCHITECT: 'GREENER P'
Can we turn parking lots into paradise?

PATRICIA CHISHOLM

Special to The Globe and Mail

A parking lot is one of those necessities of life most of us would prefer to forget when we're not in need of one.

But when the partners at PLANT Architect Inc. noticed buildings coming down at a corner near their downtown Toronto office, only to be replaced by a square of pavement for cars, they had an idea: Why not make a parking lot something green?

They envisioned a mini-park with trees for shade, native plants to help absorb and conserve rainwater, permeable low-heat paving and subtle, solar-powered lights - plus lots of space for cars, especially small ones.

Chris Pommer, who is a partner in the award-winning firm, along with his wife, Lisa Rapoport, and Mary Tremain, says PLANT's idea could potentially transform scores of featureless rectangles of street-level parking that are part of the City of Toronto's "Green P" system.

If even 5 per cent of annual parking revenues were diverted for such a project, $1-million to $2-million would be available for the overhaul, Mr. Pommer estimates.

In addition to shade trees, the proposal includes some novel items, such as "green walls."

These structures, rather like trellises, would support a variety of plants chosen for light and soil conditions.

Besides making the lot more attractive, they would provide privacy for neighbours while allowing sufficient transparency for security.

Two other features would allow the lots to be removed from the city's power and storm-water grids. Water tanks would capture rainwater and send it to water planters, while lampposts with down-facing heads (reducing light emitted upward) would be solar-powered.

New styles of porous asphalt paving, mixed with tougher materials, such as recycled glass, would reduce the waves of heat that typically bounce off these lots.

Mr. Pommer also suggests that some lots - those that parallel the subway line north of Bloor, for instance - could be closed on Sundays and made available for other uses, such as skateboarding, or turned into markets.

"Can you imagine," he asks, "150 parking lots around the city that get changed into things that don't look like parking lots? What an impact that would have."
_______________________________________________

LITTLE FIXES: JANET ROSENBERG + ASSOCIATES: 'URBAN TROPHISM'
Bringing green to the concrete under our feet

PATRICIA CHISHOLM

Special to The Globe and Mail

Good design is often driven by limits, and this idea from Janet Rosenberg + Associates is driven by a harsh reality: In much of downtown Toronto, a newly planted tree is unlikely to live five years. (See image, page M1.) Usually, there's not enough room underground for their root systems, says Ms. Rosenberg, an award-winning landscape architect. And the situation on Charlotte Street near King and Spadina is particularly tough, since a mass of unmovable pipes and cables lies just under its surface.

The solution? An artificial "forest" of green, undulating umbrellas, dotted with chloroplast-like "cells" that collect solar energy to be used at night, as well as rainwater to be retained and slowly released. The fluttering shapes act like the leaves and branches of a tree, casting dappled light on the pedestrians below. The delicate supporting rods vibrate slightly, while the overhead canopies withstand snow and heavy rain. Holes in the umbrellas let shafts of sunlight through, while lights embedded in the sidewalk add to the effect at night.

The natural theme continues underfoot, with weaving bands of green carried across the sidewalk and the road; the bands themselves (of a high-tech material containing solar cells) might also be used to collect energy.

The idea, Ms. Rosenberg explains, is to create a sense of intimacy in an intensely urban setting. "The principles are simple," she says. "It's about having your sidewalks and streets being expressive. ... It's all about pedestrian scale."

A passionate advocate both for visual transformations and more livable urban environments, Ms. Rosenberg says she is seeing a welcome new attitude toward urban design. "We've become much more visual people," she says. "I would also say that the whole way of looking at our lifestyle, from the design point of view, is knit together with environmental concerns."

Landscape architects in particular are used to the idea that many small changes can improve things. And when it comes to landscape, Ms. Rosenberg says, Toronto has not kept up with other major urban centres. To her, the current rash of cultural megaprojects is not nearly enough to transform the place. "None of those are about public spaces. But it's the public spaces that are really critical when it comes to how people feel about a city."

AoD
 
Today, Mr. Kuwabara is optimistic about the city, which he says "has the warts and pimples of a teenage city but ... a lot of potential."

That's exactly what I've long thought about Toronto. It's not quite there yet, but it sure is interesting and fun watching it enter adulthood. And the potential is enormous.
 
Is University Avenue, our only grand thoroughfare, a disappointing canyon of grey boxes in the core of the city, bisected by six lanes of traffic?

I find Spadina Avenue to be another "grand thoroughfare" in Toronto, with the LRT "median" running down the middle. Knox College at Spadina Circle makes a great focal point when looking north. The Fashion District, with its loft buildings creates an urban feeling that is different from anything on University. Chinatown, though not grand in terms of buildings, has some of the best pedestrian activity in the city. Once the Cityplace section of Spadina is lined with towers, it would create another sense of grandeur.
 
wylie:

The interesting thing is - as tall as the towers at Cityplace are, there is really nothing to visually anchor the south end of Spadina (and University). Foster's scheme for the waterfront (coupled with tearing down the Gardiner) would have changed it to some extent.

AoD
 
From the Globe, cross-posted at the Ryerson: Master Plan thread.

From the Globe:

FIXING TORONTO: PART 2 OF 6: KPMB ARCHITECTS
Building a better stage for sidewalk ballet

PATRICIA CHISHOLM

Special to The Globe and Mail

It's a serious design challenge: Somehow, transform Ryerson University's collection of indifferent buildings and dated landscaping, create an oasis of academic calm and then integrate its edges into the hyper-urban gaudiness of the Yonge and Dundas area.

That's what Kuwabara Payne McKenna Blumberg Architects and several collaborators are doing in creating a new master plan for the campus. Most of the scheme is still under wraps, but this view of a rehabilitated Gould Street is being shown here publicly for the first time.

Seemingly small shifts are going to have a big impact in this plan (a collaboration with Daoust Lestage Inc., in association with Greenberg Consultants Inc. and IBI Group).

Removal of a low retaining wall will allow sidewalks covered in high-quality paving to sweep up to the new façade's edge. Kerr Hall, the fortress-like academic building at left, will be replaced by a new structure whose façade will strive for transparency, linking inside and outside. The entry will be at street level, not raised as it is now. Rows of trees, planted deep, and well-irrigated to maximize their longevity, will cool and adorn.

While Kerr Hall was well regarded when it was built in the 1970s, every generation views its public spaces in different ways, says KPMB partner Bruce Kuwabara. The idea is to "reconfigure the public realm and the relationship of buildings to grade in the ... precinct," he says. "The streets are critical to Ryerson's liveliness. The streets are its campus."

Referring to the European practice of transforming spaces by reorganizing elements that are already there, Mr. Kuwabara argues that transforming sidewalks can make a huge difference in terms of street life. As Jane Jacobs understood, the sidewalk is "the domain where so many occurrences happen."

And investing in public spaces can only help to create a more livable campus - which will also enhance real-estate values. "In this little picture, as innocent as it may seem, is the whole picture."

LAST WEEK IN PART 1:

A green vision from PLANT Architect for the city's Green P lots; an artificial urban forest from Janet Rosenberg + Associates.

NEXT WEEK IN PART 3:

Bessai Denegri Studio turns University Avenue into a real boulevard.

Can a few clever design moves transform Toronto's streetscape? Over the next four weeks, follow the series and check out more images at http://www.globeandmail.com

AoD
 
Third installment in the series, from the Globe:

FIXING TORONTO: DENEGRI BESSAI STUDIO: UNIVERSITY AVENUE
Bringing some class to University

PATRICIA CHISHOLM

Special to The Globe and Mail

May 12, 2007

There is a grainy, decades-old film of urbanist Jane Jacobs standing at the south end of Queen's Park, looking down Toronto's only grand thoroughfare and saying, with her characteristic firmness, "I hate University Avenue."

Many have agreed with her over the years, but what to do? Architect Tom Bessai - an assistant professor at the University of Toronto's faculty of architecture, landscape and design, and partner, with his wife, Maria Denegri, in Denegri Bessai Studio - has a solution.

His scheme for the avenue's rejuvenation takes advantage of all of its unique features: its grand width, its role as a connector between the public buildings at its north end and the downtown, its ceremonial purpose. But it also takes square aim at its lack of humanity, its greyness and its outdated glorification of the car. "The tools for renewal rest right there in the boulevard itself," Mr. Bessai says. "It is the most significant axial road in the city and it's a mess."

His new design for the area would, most importantly, reduce its eight lanes to four (two each way). The freed-up space would be used to greatly widen the centre median, now virtually inaccessible as a public space. This could result in areas as wide as 27 metres across in some sections for reimagined spaces that would become - with inventive new paving, contemporary light standards that vary in height and placement, new benches and kiosks - like a "series of linked outdoor rooms," Mr. Bessai says.

The goal, he says, is to use elements scaled to pedestrian life; animating the street at that level will counterbalance the façades of concrete and steel that line the road from College to Adelaide streets, a distance of 1.2 kilometres. The new light standards, for instance, would be designed to create different moods - "allowing for the intimacy of conversation," for instance, in front of the Four Seasons Centre at Queen Street.

As the area becomes more inviting for pedestrians, vibrant retail elements would move into the space, creating a new destination for shopping, eating, strolling. None of the existing memorials would be changed; in fact, they are likely to become much more accessible, Mr. Bessai says. "This is about using University Avenue every day - not just for a parade."

AoD
 
Sounds pretty much what the current design is trying to be... only wider by 10 metres or so. I can't see that making much of a difference, and certainly wouldn't have made Jane Jacobs like the street.

For that matter, the traffic is still there and people and goods still have places they need to get to.
 
The Globe's Fixing Toronto series continues to spawn overdesigned solutions to non-existent problems.

Today, a "Toronto-raised intern architect" named Donald Chong identifies and then "fixes" the "problem" of Riverdale Park. He suggests a series of stepped viewing platforms, snaking down the slope on the east side of the valley from top to bottom, built with wood from cut-down trees salvaged from construction sites. The project, he estimates, would take 12 years to complete.

However, this would prevent people from tobogganing down the slope in the winter, as many do. And Riverdale's voracious termites would make quick work of all that wood/soil contact.

If it ain't broke, don't "fix" it say I.
 
The Globe's Fixing Toronto series continues to spawn overdesigned solutions to non-existent problems.

Today, a "Toronto-raised intern architect" named Donald Chong identifies and then "fixes" the "problem" of Riverdale Park. He suggests a series of stepped viewing platforms, snaking down the slope on the east side of the valley from top to bottom, built with wood from cut-down trees salvaged from construction sites. The project, he estimates, would take 12 years to complete.

However, this would prevent people from tobogganing down the slope in the winter, as many do. And Riverdale's voracious termites would make quick work of all that wood/soil contact.

If it ain't broke, don't "fix" it say I.
I second that. There's nothing wrong with Riverdale Park - leave it alone. Viewing platforms, what for? What are we supposed to view, passing traffic on the DVP?
 

Back
Top